Those comments are based, by the way! It's good to see people wise to this.
The science of doubles has definitely progressed within the last few decades. They can create basically anything they want nowadays.
My biggest fascination is the process. Like, some feel like they were rush jobs. A panic-created double to appease public speculation. Others have more work put into them.
So many Hillaries circulated after the side of beef incident. I recall seeing a video of an ex-Clinton WH staffer even questioning the truth of Hillary well before that, noting that her eye color was inconsistent.
I feel like they hadn't anticipated Trumpian justice and that the 2016 Bill and Hillary actually were executed, or at least one set was.
The most interesting part is when they're fresh. Their first public performance.
For example, there's a 1967 interview which seems to be the first majorly rehearsed interview for the brand new Paul McCartney. But this was straight up CIA-style surgery and prosthetics, not the later Soviet cloning/robotoid techniques. So he's got some nervous tells. Sort of pulls at his ear and says "you know" at the end of most of his sentences.
It's fascinating from a societal/technological/ethical/spiritual perspective, but it's absolutely horrifying when you think of it.
We're basically in a world full of vampires and body snatchers.
I think that's really interesting. I knew about the Paul is Dead theory a long time ago but never gave it too much thought. If you look at these 2 photos of Paul side by side, its quite a change in facial structure for only 2 years having passed: https://shenandoahliterary.org/snopes/files/2015/04/beatles.png
Also I watched the 1967 interview where he is acting really strange, and someone counted he says "y'know" 53 times in 6 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C2y0iQXhQU
I could rattle on for hours about the Paul thing. But yeah. That was the video I meant. Dude is not comfortable in his own skin, and clearly is there to deliver "an agenda".
When it comes to the Beatles, there is such a web of occultism that you could talk about any one aspect of it for hours on end.
But overall, it was part of the cultural shift to Satanism and Communism in the guise of "peace and love" delivered to a generation of children to separate them from their mass-traumatized post-war parents' generation.
The sheer psychological fragmentation done to society as a whole is mind-boggling.
Those comments are based, by the way! It's good to see people wise to this.
The science of doubles has definitely progressed within the last few decades. They can create basically anything they want nowadays.
My biggest fascination is the process. Like, some feel like they were rush jobs. A panic-created double to appease public speculation. Others have more work put into them.
So many Hillaries circulated after the side of beef incident. I recall seeing a video of an ex-Clinton WH staffer even questioning the truth of Hillary well before that, noting that her eye color was inconsistent.
I feel like they hadn't anticipated Trumpian justice and that the 2016 Bill and Hillary actually were executed, or at least one set was.
The most interesting part is when they're fresh. Their first public performance.
For example, there's a 1967 interview which seems to be the first majorly rehearsed interview for the brand new Paul McCartney. But this was straight up CIA-style surgery and prosthetics, not the later Soviet cloning/robotoid techniques. So he's got some nervous tells. Sort of pulls at his ear and says "you know" at the end of most of his sentences.
It's fascinating from a societal/technological/ethical/spiritual perspective, but it's absolutely horrifying when you think of it.
We're basically in a world full of vampires and body snatchers.
I think that's really interesting. I knew about the Paul is Dead theory a long time ago but never gave it too much thought. If you look at these 2 photos of Paul side by side, its quite a change in facial structure for only 2 years having passed: https://shenandoahliterary.org/snopes/files/2015/04/beatles.png
Also I watched the 1967 interview where he is acting really strange, and someone counted he says "y'know" 53 times in 6 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C2y0iQXhQU
I could rattle on for hours about the Paul thing. But yeah. That was the video I meant. Dude is not comfortable in his own skin, and clearly is there to deliver "an agenda".
When it comes to the Beatles, there is such a web of occultism that you could talk about any one aspect of it for hours on end.
But overall, it was part of the cultural shift to Satanism and Communism in the guise of "peace and love" delivered to a generation of children to separate them from their mass-traumatized post-war parents' generation.
The sheer psychological fragmentation done to society as a whole is mind-boggling.
Perhaps some other time. But yes, I have.
Haven't looked into Paul's death but from my own knowledge of facial aesthetics it looks like that change can be done by a loss of bodyfat percentage.