Che Guevara was big in art and mode for a long time. Most who wear a Che T-shirt or had an image from him didn't know shit about him.
But this is not the point. The point is, people really like to jump conclusions if it fits their believes.
The blackout in vaticane was a camera filter. We all saw this (there were memes saying "this is worse, you understand how thos is worse right?".
- Saying giving a timeline is a security risk, but saying what will happen, and it will happen in the next few days is not?
Even if all this is true, its still written in a very propagana way! I hope people learn to detect propaganda even (or espacially) if they want it to be true. (Dont forget, propaganda is usually done with 95% truth and only a small amount of lies, or by selectivly reporting about a story -> no lies but not all the truth).
With the vaticane blackout story/lie (cam filter) this reinforces my worry that the next act will be: hunting domestic terrorists, increase censorship, create new anti terror laws (USA is back in business yay),, and dont forget more hate in the name of tolerance.
Now i read the read the rest of this very entertaining story.
There is another theory, very controversal. Its just art. What i realize, people in general are very quick to jump on something if it supports their believe, but very critical if it attacks their believe. And while this is a good strategy to push and streangthen your own believe (which is important for our mind), its a bad strategy if you seek the truth.
To this case "your mao is showing" i hope this becomesa new meme, very funny! But ever consider that its was just a "hey your art could be missunderstood, better change your cam direction if you dont want a shitstorm"?
"Blake shows how the mysterious persona of Guccifer 2.0, who claimed the hack, was played by none other than Alperovitch himself, while the technical infrastructure, including the notorious website dcleaks.com, was provided by US and NATO intermediaries in NATO member Romania."
From: https://swprs.org/russian-hacking-nato-psyop-revealed/
SS: Why did Biden use the words "Dark Winter". I guess somewhere in his mind/memory he remembered this exercise from the year 2001.
"The problem is, we do not have enough vaccine.. It means this could be a very dark winter in America." was one of the fictional media reports in this exercise. Said by Robert Kadlec in 2001. Robert Kedlec belong to the corona taskforce of Mike Pence in 2020.
Axolotl_peyotl did you check an offizial source on this or just copy past a random tweet?
What i love about conspiracy forums is sometimes you get news and infos noone else publishes.
What i hate is often people are very fast to post a tweet or something else that fits their narrative without checking if its true or just random noise.
What i would love is a alternativenews.win site. I would even subscripe and pay for it when they research their topics and fill it with sources
you have this one?
his whifes fb post: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/kwoqfd/death_as_a_side_effect_from_pfizer_vaccine/
Also you may want to use double enter for a new line?
anyway, thanks for your work, please keep it up. It will be helpful.
meh in this video her eyes don't look like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOq1I9IPdIM
yea absolutely possible. but it's a very doomer-thought.