-1
Michalusmichalus -1 points ago +1 / -2

I was, and remain intent that you comment to the material.

-1
Michalusmichalus -1 points ago +1 / -2

You can use 4G, LTE, and 4G LTE as an example. All of that was just one up bullshitery. Physics isn't changing. Ma Bell had original studies showing the size of the wavelength used for 5G is bad for the human body. ( that's decades before the carriers bought the band)

IEEE is about standards, not labels to the customers. The US has not implemented 5G at the intensity, or with the safety gap the UK has. This is the issue the FAA had with the FCC.

https://futurenetworks.ieee.org/tech-focus/june-2017/standards-for-5g-and-beyond

0
Michalusmichalus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Let's not forget the Internet of Bodies

https://www.rand.org/about/nextgen/art-plus-data/giorgia-lupi/internet-of-bodies-our-connected-future.html

The part of the article about the wavelength ricocheting inside the human anatomy isn't very healthy either.

-2
Michalusmichalus -2 points ago +1 / -3

You seem to not need any encourgment with your fan fiction. Please continue without me. Just leave me out of it. Unlike the rest of you malicious disinformation commentary.

-2
Michalusmichalus -2 points ago +1 / -3

It's not going to work. Not on me, and not on anyone who comes after to read this.

-2
Michalusmichalus -2 points ago +1 / -3

I have no time for you. Remedial classes can be found with the lunatic left. You may need to work on your pronouns, and dick inverting before they'll take you. But, since you like to play their games you'll be right at home.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +2 / -1

You said that, not me. Stop wasting my time.

Edit : YOU clearly didn't read the article, or you would have something to say about the pulsing functionality of 5G vs your bullshit. Don't complain to others that you don't understand the materials when you don't take time to read them.

-1
Michalusmichalus -1 points ago +2 / -3

First, I read the article, and the article that compliments it because I find this topic interesting. I do not find you, and your gotcha stupid questions worth anyone's time. Not even your own.

If you have a question from the article, ask it. If you think I'm writing you a fucking essay because you can't take the time to read an article... You think wrong. If you think I can be nagged into writing you an essay, wrong again.

You wasted your time with me. Go learn something, or go find another topic if this one doesn't suit you.

-2
Michalusmichalus -2 points ago +2 / -4

If you can't read the materials, there's no discussion to be had.

-1
Michalusmichalus -1 points ago +2 / -3

Your comment was in bad faith, yet I still gave you the benefit of the doubt. There is now no doubt. Your comments are in bad faith. Read the article, or have a nice night.

I NEVER do pop quizzes

-1
Michalusmichalus -1 points ago +2 / -3

That's not a quote from me. You just intentionally participated in disinformation.

-1
Michalusmichalus -1 points ago +2 / -3

If you have a question from the article, please ask. I don't do book reports for people too lazy to read an article.

0
Michalusmichalus 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's in the article.

The frequency bands for 5G networks come in two sets. Frequency range 1 is from 450 MHz to 6 GHz. Frequency range 2 is from 24.25 GHz to 52.6 GHz.

https://www.sdxcentral.com/5g/definitions/what-is-5g/what-is-5g-spectrum/

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

RaaS happens daily. This company failed basic security protocols ( read the article), and then blamed the customer ( read the article). This shit can not be allowed to stand, the rest of the companies will follow.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

It wasn't selfish to get deplatformed to try get the information out. I don't believe it's selfish to be over old news. You can't care more than the person themselves cares. They don't care, they can enjoy that. I'm over it. I'm not reviewing the same material just because the lunatic covered their ears, and eyes.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Giving control of finances is required to be president. I remember the lunatics didn't like that he chose someone rather than letting them chosen someone. I wouldn't trust them with a dollar, I don't blame him.

4
Michalusmichalus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Many of the thread have little to no interaction most days. Then someone reads a comment like that, interaction goes up slightly for a short time. A few days ago all the effort was on r/conspiracy, there was a thread about it. When that happens go to the drama sites. Empty.

Dailydot, and Boredpanda have to go back in the archives to material when ever this happens. It's been happening a whole lot recently.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›