Don't forget this is why Parlerwatch, and Trumpvirus switched to horse porn. Reddit has become the place to hunt child predetors.
&
Marianne Eloise wants the world to know that she does not “have a regular brain at all”. That’s her declaration, on the very first page of her new memoir, Obsessive, Intrusive, Magical Thinking. The book catalogues her experience of a dizzying variety of psychiatric conditions: OCD, anxiety, autism, ADHD, alcohol abuse, seasonal affective disorder, an eating disorder, night terrors, depression. By her own telling, Eloise has suffered a great deal from these ailments; I believe her, and wish better for her. But she would prefer we not think of them as ailments at all. And that combination of self-pity and self-aggrandisement is emblematic of our contemporary understanding of mental health.
Eloise is a champion of neurodivergence, an omnibus term that’s recently ballooned in popularity, which can include autism, anxiety, borderline personality disorder, or indeed any other psychiatric condition that’s hot right now. The term is designed for making sweeping pronouncements. Forget the fact that, say, autism and schizophrenia are so different that they have at times been described as opposite conditions. Forget the fact that saying you’re neurodivergent has as much medical meaning as saying you have a disorder of the body. The idea is that there’s a group of people whose brain chemistry differs, in some beautiful way, from some Platonic norm. And it’s an idea that’s taken on great symbolic power in contemporary liberal culture.
Link:
https://unherd.com/2022/04/mental-illness-doesnt-make-you-special/
When your problems become your identity there's no incentive to work on yourself. We've seen this with mentally ill demanding the right not to medicate because it hinders their art. An example everyone would be familiar with is Kanye West. This is my theory about some Kanye's problems.
This explains better than I can the differences we learned vs what is now being taught.
Colorblind Civil Rights v. Woke Civil Rights
"At the root of wokeness is the 1954 decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Or, rather the abuse of it. In a highly constitutionally-suspect decision (it contained no footnotes, case references and, as Caldwell notes in his 2020 book The Age of Entitlement, “each of its two parts ran about the length of a newspaper column”), the Supreme Court in Brown unanimously held that laws in certain southern states assigning kids to schools based on race (that is, the “separate, but equal” doctrine adopted in Plessy v. Ferguson) were in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. By banning racial discrimination in school placements full stop, Brown was understood and celebrated at the time as a ruling which finally and fully entrenched colorblindness in American society."
"While southern segregation laws did end there, as the recently deceased UT-Austin law professor Lino Graglia has written, because of the lack of racial integration found elsewhere in society (and not just in the South), Brown came to be seen by some “not as a triumph but as something of a disappointment, and its prohibition of discrimination as an obstacle rather than an aid to racial equality.” He cites progressive law scholars who have claimed that, if left as is, Brown’s colorblindness principle would have “obstructed the goal of equal achievement” and “imped[ed] efforts to dismantle old racial hierarchies.” Just like the woke today, progressives before them wanted something “more” than mere colorblindness in society and our legal system."
This is elaboration on equity vs equality just in case it's too verbose to be clear. Link:
Girl: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/girl
Woman: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woman
This grevience studies garbage needs to go already.
Share your Twatter theories here : I'm very curious. Some of the things I've read on superstonk show that Elon likes to play games.
