-24
MagaPede69 -24 points ago +2 / -26

I mean, he has been very busy playing golf and organizing his wannabe militia on Twitter, so I get it.

-18
MagaPede69 -18 points ago +4 / -22

I mean... no? I'll reply to whomever and whatever I want, friend. If you spout idiocy, I'll be right there comment in hand.

-19
MagaPede69 -19 points ago +3 / -22

I appreciate the hunt for truth and looking under every rock, as it were, but Sidney Powell doesn't have a great track record for speaking the truth.

-12
MagaPede69 -12 points ago +2 / -14

See, it's things like this that ruffle my feathers. I would bet this man wrote a 100,000 word manifesto he wanted the world to read, and much like the Las Vegas shooter, who probably did the same thing, we'll never actually know why he did it.

I guess officials don't want to inspire anyone based on his words, or maybe it was something far more nefarious, like an act of terror against some secret infrastructure we're not supposed to know exists... but man.

-14
MagaPede69 -14 points ago +2 / -16

Predestination. The concept that an all-knowing God knows who will and will not end up in Heaven. It also implies that there is no true free will if God ultimately knows everything that was, is and will be.

One of the many, many reasons why I don't buy into Christian dogma.

-13
MagaPede69 -13 points ago +1 / -14

It depends on what you mean by technology. Because the laser ranging retroreflector experiment uses "technology."

-13
MagaPede69 -13 points ago +1 / -14

There's actually been several mirrors left on the surface of the moon that physicists and other scientists have been able to shoot with high powered lasers.

https://www.space.com/apollo-retroreflector-experiment-still-going-50-years-later.html

What's neat about the experiment is that labs all over the world can participate. There's been dozens of independently published papers on the moon mirror and the result impact on relativity and our understanding of lunar orbit.

-15
MagaPede69 -15 points ago +3 / -18

That actually surprises me a bit. I fully expected a noticeable increase. Not like, anything massive, but noticeable. Maybe 3-5%...

-13
MagaPede69 -13 points ago +3 / -16

Alex Jones is a meme of himself at this point. He lost any credibility he had when he spent 75% of his show pushing his supplements.

-11
MagaPede69 -11 points ago +2 / -13

A lot of good men died at the Battle of Meme Road Bridge.

-12
MagaPede69 -12 points ago +3 / -15

Why don't you prove you're not one of Axo's many, many alt accounts? We'll wait.

-12
MagaPede69 -12 points ago +3 / -15

The first war ever fought from the comfort of the home. Keyboard warriors unite!

-13
MagaPede69 -13 points ago +3 / -16

Based on her upbringing, it's far, far more likely she's a Russian asset and not a Chinese one.

-12
MagaPede69 -12 points ago +3 / -15

So, January 6th is the day that both chambers of Congress will gather in Washington to count the results from the electoral college. This event, is largely seen as symbolic, as Congress itself has only one way to dispute the count and overturn the results from any particular state.

For those unfamiliar, members of congress can dispute the results. But the dispute must be placed in writing and a member of both the House and Senate must sign off on each dispute. Once there is a dispute, both chambers go off for a bit to discuss and vote. In order to certify the dispute, a simple majority vote is taken, and both chambers must reach a majority.

McConnell has already signaled that he does not support such a process, and there's no chance that a Democratically-controlled House would vote in a majority to overturn any state's electoral count.

So, what exactly does the President think will happen on January 6th? Why is he inviting anyone from the public to come to Washington D.C. that day? The procedure is an exercise in formality. Nothing more.

-10
MagaPede69 -10 points ago +5 / -15

Answering questions earnestly without agenda can be difficult when those answers force self-examination of yourself and beliefs. It's much easier to deflect, change the subject and name call without justifying the answer itself.

-15
MagaPede69 -15 points ago +4 / -19

It's the same line of reasoning that believes the election will still be overturned and Trump will somehow maintain power. Logic, reason and the ability to understand process doesn't exist in a cult.

-9
MagaPede69 -9 points ago +6 / -15

I haven't noticed any of my posts getting deleted, but if I do, I'll be sure to let the community know.

-11
MagaPede69 -11 points ago +2 / -13

I don't believe that to be true. I do agree that Trump supporters tend to be 100x more vocal than Biden supporters, but a loud minority a majority does not make.

-11
MagaPede69 -11 points ago +4 / -15

Daww, thanks! Without debate and discussion, we all lose out on expanding our minds.

-14
MagaPede69 -14 points ago +5 / -19

Badly. He lost the votes. He lost in the courts. He lost in the electoral college certification. And he'll lose on January 6th when Congress receives the results.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›