Powerful people are the only ones that hold other powerful people accountable, and sometimes, powerful people are not all on the same team.
So, that said, when's the last time decent humanity, won the day? Brexit? Trump in 2016? The Heller decision in the U.S.? Luke Skywalker on the Mandolorian? They dropped a remake of The Princess Bride? George Zimmerman found not guilty? NFL and NBA and Oscars ratings are in the toilet?
Drop me some white pills folks. I'm glad the audit is going on in AZ, as a start.
To me, that some GOP members benefited from Dominion voting machines is the only rational explanation for why they don't investigate. Granted, there may be a level of denial as well.
That said, we know the the GA governor has, but who else. I saw somewhere good ol turtle Mitch McConnell has (and I like to know more), but there must be more, because no rational person can see what happened to Trump and be complacent about it.
To everyone who thinks Trump was a Trojan Horse, or deepstate himself.
If you think that Trump was a Trojan Horse, or deepstate himself, you don’t understand the one key thing about politics…to the victor go the spoils. The definition of politics is “who get what.”
Politics is about rewarding your friends, and by extension in a democracy, punishing your enemies, by taking tax dollars from one group and giving it to another. If Trump was installed as some part of a powersharing agreement, you’re forgetting that for four years tax dollars didn’t go to Democrat priorities as much as Republican priorities (and we can see that switch now). Moreover, the tax cuts, where Republicans got rid of the state and local tax (SALT), that was a huge FU to blue states. So huge, it’s primarily the reason that the House went Democrat in 2018.
If Trump were installed, would they really have acted so apeshit crazy, but have been faking it the whole time, and passed on the opportunity to have Hillary keep their gravy train running? That makes zero sense.
Look, I get it, I’m upset he didn’t do enough about the cheating and thus the Dems stole the election in 2020. But sometimes the bad guys win, and the good guys lose. Happens all the time in history.
So which is it, conspiracies.win?
Is space not real and we have never been to space or the earth is flat, etc. etc. (the arguments vary) or have UFOs and aliens been visiting the earth?
For those who haven't seen it, Mike Lindell had his Absolute Proof video on election fraud in 2020.
The money shot, as it were, after all the stuff about fraudulent mail in ballots, etc. etc. came at the 1 hour and 36 minutes. Mary Fanning, a "national intelligence researcher and author" does the explaining that teams were set up in advance of the election by private researchers to track the hacking of the internet connected voting machines.
Who were these people, and is more coming out? Lots of "deboooking" articles out there, ironically that clash with the Time article talking points about rigging the election, but I can't find anything solid.
Link to video: https://michaeljlindell.com/
Sorry, no flashy memes, and this takes some paragraphs to explain. It's kind of a big deal flying under the radar. TL:DR at the bottom.
The initial 2020 CARES Act stimulus bill of $2.2 trillion under Trump had a deadline that all the billions of dollars sent to local and state governments for pandemic related expenses, if not used, had to be returned to the federal government by December 1st 2020. The reason that the payouts to individual citizens was only $1,200 was because the rest of the money went to state and local governments to pay for their response efforts, and they in turn dished it out to nonprofits, etc. etc.
In late November 2020, an extension was given until December 1st, 2021 for the return of the funds. Now, if the initial CARES Act funds are not spent by Dec 1, 2021, as per the law, they are supposed to be returned to the feds as per the law.
I have just learned, as I work in public sector finance, that the feds are now allowing funds to be "de-federalized" in order to prevent them from returning completely! It's basically legal money laundering.
How this works - say you are in city X, and you got $1,000,000 in revenue to pay for pandemic related expenses, but you only had $500,000 of allowable expenses. (The 2020 CARES Act was very specific as to what was an allowable pandemic related expense. Rent support for the unemployed was allowable, community gardens were not. You get the idea.) Prior January 2021, you had to return $500,000 of that $1,000,000. Now the feds are saying you can overbudget allowable expenses and keep the change, as it were, as if you are a patron at a restaurant leaving a big tip.
Since you budgeted for an allowable expense, but didn't use all of it, this change in policy allows you to keep the remaining revenue. That $500,000 now drops into your budget and is treated the same as other tax dollars, and you can keep it as fund balance.
This means that state and local governments, given an additional year, will find all sorts of creative ways to spend their full 2020 CARES Act allotment, and thus not return it to the feds.
This change means there will also be no politically tricky questions about why there was a 2nd, and then 3rd stimulus when states and municipalities are returning large amounts of money from the first stimulus.
TL:DR - The Feds changed the policy on the first stimulus to allows states municipalities to keep the money in contrivance of the law, through creative accounting, to make it appear that there is a need for a 3rd or 4th stimulus.
The "consensus" today is that the 1960 election was stolen from Nixon (at the time Ike's VP) and given to JFK though ballot box stuffing in at least two select key swing states: Illinois though the efforts of the Daley Democrat political machine and in Texas through LBJ's network of southern Democrats. Remember, Texas went for Ike twice; it was a swing state back then.
This consensus comes from mounds of work by investigative journalists, professional historians, political scientists and others. Nobody doubts it today, though not that many people talk about it, because, seriously, how often does the 1960 election come up. Only the ignorant, and there are many, don't know about how Nixon was robbed in 1960.
Nixon did not contest the election, because he thought the country would be ungovernable even if he won. It was still ungovernable when he won later. The left set out to destroy him from day 1 of his term, so he wasn't wrong.
The thing is, this "consensus" took about 40 years to form. There was a pall cast over the issue until it was safe, given the distance of time, to look dispassionately at the data. But form it did, because there was to much evidence for voter fraud there not to be a consensus on the issue.
I'm in my 40s. I think I may see in my lifetime that the historians, political scientists, journalists, and general academics at least two generations from now will, when it requires no bravery, admit that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.
…he was a commie degenerate plagiarizer who wanted reparations.
His real name was not Martin Luther King, it was Michael King Jr.; “Luther” was to add (fake) gravitas.
He plagiarized his dissertation: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/11/us/boston-u-panel-finds-plagiarism-by-dr-king.html
Further research, showed he plagiarized throughout his schooling and his career: https://www.amren.com/news/2018/01/martin-luther-king-jr-plagiarism/
He watched as a woman got raped in front of him, laughed, and offered advice: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32989551.pdf#page=18
This rape, occurred when King and compatriots were discussion their orgy habits: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32989551.pdf#page=18
MLK wanted reparations, that is, a direct transfer of wealth: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/06/martin-luther-king-makes-the-case-for-reparations/372696/
And he was a communist: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10133.pdf
So, while COINTELPRO was unconstitutional, and illegal, Hoover had it right about MLK. He only pretended the Civil Rights movement was about equal protection under the law and the end of Jim Crow, the actual endgame was communism and the appropriation of other people’s money to blacks.
His assassination was ironic, in that it happened at the exact moment of his highest popularity, and before his communism and calls for reparations really took off, which would have turned most Americans off to him. Without his assassination, he’d not have the hagiography he does from mainstream press and academia.
Has anyone noticed, that the crowd adamantly against GMOs isn't not vocal against the COVID vaccines, which don't just alter the DNA of the food you eat? Or am I just missing it?
