BTC isn't going to zero folks. Blackrock and the others globalists have coopted it.

I'm not saying God protected Trump, what I am saying, is that like the assassination attempt of Pope John Paul II survived only by a twist of fate. He moved his body, by chance, out of the way.

Mehmet Ali Ağca shot four shots at John Paul II. The first two at his head, and the second two at his body. At the precise moment the heads shots from the Browning Hi-Power were fired at the pope's head, he had bent down to pick up a little child, an Italian carpenter's daughter. The bullets passed over him and struck two American tourists. The headshots at that range would surely have killed him. He survived the wound to his torso and the one to his hand.

TLDR:

Please don't use the idea that "it was just so lucky" as evidence it was fake. There are other reasons it could be fake, if you're going to hang your hat on anything.

....it means that's it's probably not clear, obvious, or simple.

More appropriately, doing so is called "begging the question."

I am seeing various "the shooting is fake" videos out there. I applaud them. But some of the so-called experts pointing out the "inconsistency" of the sound of the would be assassin's gun and the SS snipers on the roof have a Hollywood idea of what a long range gunfight sounds like.

In short, from about 150 yards or so, the bullet hits before you hear the sound of the mini-sonic boom, or the crack of the bullet in the air. Why? Because the bullet moves faster than the sound.

Let Lindybeige explain it to you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDn7zW8jTzw

I despise the man, but I put myself (mentally) into the shoes of an idiot and a democrat (but I repeat myself), and it was a weak performance, but it's not like the passed out on stage, or babbled some stupid shit any more than he has since he was Obama's VP.

I listened to the first part as I was coming back from an errand on the radio. The radio format emphasized Biden's whisper voice, that came off as a bit frail. But it did sound that bad. I told myself I wasn't going to watch it, but when I walked into the front door, one of my kids had it on the tv. So I sat down and watched.

I saw most of it, and Biden was a bit spacey, and Trump did a good job of making him seem worse by emphasizing some of the dumb stuff he said. But again, he wasn't that bad.

I'm saying this, only because it seems to be that if the media had collectively said he "did okay" or "held his own" or some such...the lie would remain intact. Or at least idiot democrats would tell themselves that "he's doing okay."

We've had 4 years now of him misspeaking and babbling stupid incoherent shit. What's the difference with the debate? Why do they want to take him out?

I don't know why, because of all the replacements, he is the one that polls the highest. Moreover, his name can't be replaced on three state ballots unless he steps down from the presidency.