Use your browser and refresh a billion times a day like I do here
We are all going to have to deal with a lot less convenience in the coming years. One could argue ridiculous levels of convenience is what got us here in the first place.
But yes on principal it's a shitty fucking move
I can across this video but I don't know which site I was on Anyway (https://youtu.be/2Dk9J4trZaI)
What politicians have been doing slowly over the years have created a state so expansive , so convoluted, so obstructive and so complex that there's no easy action the masses could take to topple it.
Organizing means giving people simple clear directives that help them force change. Directives that when put into place en mass buck the system.
Show up at this time to protest
Vote x on this day
Stop buying x product
Stop watching x channel
Leave x social media site
The more people you need to effect the change the simpler the directives have to be.
But the State have created an impenetrable fortress with no seeming Achilles heel. What are the clear simple action we can take that wouldnt be thwarted by some other layer of bureaucracy?
Okay we protest CIA /Mockingbird media has a psyop for that
Okay we stop paying taxes Okay the NSA and IRS have already been weaponized for that. Or Fed prints more money it's all funny money anyway.
Okay we turn the media off and stop listening Well they still control the schools , global corporations, hell even weather reporting services can be propaganda tools.
It's endless.
This is a half Baked theory but anyone who seems to get what I'm trying to say please help me flesh it out here.
Tldr: the state has us trapped in an endless maze of complexity making it impossible to topple the system from within as most organizing methods rely to some degree on the state itself.
Edited to add I found this link on the power of the powerless. (https://youtu.be/2Dk9J4trZaI)
Now you see why most republicans aren't figthting it ! Small time theft is easy. Massive not so easy. Or should I say, it's not that cheap. .... For the record I believed in the Uniparty; they just took turns stealing various elections to make it look like we had a choice. And that kept the peasants happy. One round it'd be bush, next time Obama etc. One cycle the dems would have the house next time, the Gop.
But it's starting to seem like more resources are flowing to the dems in order to fund these fraud operations. Probably because they've been perfecting the art of the steal relatively undetected in large cities for decades. JFK won because of an overnight ballot dump out of Chicago. He did not win Ohio. Which tells you it was most likely fraud.
Anyway, you need to buy election officials, election boards, judges , secretaries of state, state Supreme courts plus pay for all the footsoldiers on the ground to pull this off.
Almost forgot! You need to pay for voting machines that can be hacked, you need to pay for fraudulent ballots, bribes to postal workers, harvesters etc.
That shit ain't cheap. Either party could been bought off in such a massive way by external powers that want to control all levers of power. But they're backing the dems. Why?
Let's say I want to invest in stealing elections-- who would I back? The party that dabbled in election fraud over the years or the party that's perfected the art over several decades with the added bonus of a media blackout to cover it up? I mean it's a no brainer.
And before you think that too big of a steal to pull off remember that these people aren't like you and I . They are power hungry psychopaths who will do anything to expand their grip on their subjects.
We are drowning in corruption on all sides. Wish the people would rise up and rebel against the ruling class. This red/blue shit is tiresome.
Anyone trying to mind hack the NPCs is okay is my book. Hope you crack the code. This is a great start, reasoning from First Principles. Let's define what we're talking about first before moving on. Normies hate that shit because ouch thinking is hard.
So as i understand it the mainstream narrative claimed that the jet fuel from the planes caused an explosion in the towers which melted the steel beams of the structure causing it to collapse on itself.
This was the mainstream explanation given.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
This is the alternative response to the main stream narrative.
Sadly my best friends brother died in 9/11 and she cannot accept the truth. She believes the 3rd tower was a controlled demolition because the explosions from the first two towers made purposefully demolishing the third a necessity. She believes it was jihadists. She believs the nonsense about the pentagon. She believes het fuel can melt steel beams. Blue collar new yorkers seem the least likely to see through it because of the trauma of knowing people who died and/or being downtown in person that day. I don't push the issue even though she's red pilled about literally everything else.
Slightly off topic but...get your kids out of government schools if you can do it. They want our kids drooling in front of computerus half comatose for 7 hours straight. Easiest way to kill critical thinking entirely is to start with the youngest minds.
Use your browser and refresh a billion times a day like I do here
We are all going to have to deal with a lot less convenience in the coming years.
But yes on principal it's a shitty fucking move