You missed the key premise - prior to being forced, who did they worship.
I’m referring to things like Zoroastrianism and the multiple Druidic religions of Europe before Rome was conquered and subverted by Jewish missionaries to force the whites to accept the Jewish messiah as their figurehead and by extension the god of Israel as the only god
Innate, as in inbuilt, natural. Not received from some genocidal, sacrificial demon god of a hostile foreign people. If you credit him with your morality then you are simply an undeveloped baby-eating epsteinesque monstrosity whose only constrained through lack of opportunity.
You asked specifically about the Jews - because we were talking about their book, their plan, and their god.
If it’s nonsense, then tell me:
Prior to being forced into the worship of the god of Israel, who did the Arabs and whites worship?
Has Islam taken hold of the complete Arab world and beyond?
Has Christianity taken hold of the complete white world and beyond?
I presume you acknowledge and accept that both Islam and Christianity are Abrahamic faiths with the god of Abraham ie the god of Israel as the figurehead and that they are derived from the Old Testament etc
Yours is the retarded argument. Islam is how the Jews replaced all the Arabs native religions like Zoroastrianism et al and had them worship the god of Israel, just like how they created Christianity as the replacement theology for the whites native religions.
Either way you get everyone abandoning their own god to worship the god of Israel and accept the Jews as gods chosen people.
Oh, and the prophets dying? Who gives a fuck? They all foretold your coming enslavement and subservience to the Jews anyway which Jesus naturally supported. It’s not even prophecy- it’s a blueprint for dominion laid out as prophecy. It is a plan, not a ‘prophecy’
It’s not exactly free billions when Israel owns all the money anyway. It’s Jews giving their own money (which is all the money) to their homeland.
Most countries are vassal states of Israel and every countries money is supplied and controlled by Jews
The reason he speaks in parables is laid out explicitly in the red letters of the gospels - because the disciples asked exactly that question.
The answer is to prevent the masses from gaining understanding.
Also, if you think you can speak with this guy you’re just schizophrenic
You selectively quote.
The full bhoona is this:
Luk 8:10 he said, “To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of God, but for others they are in parables, so that ‘seeing they may not see, and hearing they may not understand.’
Deception.
None of what you wrote makes sense and it is completely easy to hang Jesus with his own words.
For example, Jesus says that he speaks in parables in order to deceive people and prevent them from understanding and salvation doesn’t he
Nope, because personality is what happens when you are fragmented from the whole and identify with your imprisoned spirit or ego. The source is beyond those things and it’s not bound in a temporal body like we think we are. And therefore it’s not amenable to anthropomorphisation.
Why did Jesus say he had other sheep to bring into this fold? You interpret that to mean gentiles but if you want to remain consistent with Jesus message throughout his mission then this is clearly a reference to the ‘lost sheep of the house of Israel’ which Jesus repeatedly stated that he only came for. And when he sent his apostles out to proselytise he instructed them clearly to stay away from the gentiles and go only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. That’s what he is referring to - those are the other sheep that he had to bring into his existing fold of followers (who were also Jewish) Unless you would have it that Jesus is a schizophrenic or liar who said one thing but meant the opposite?
Why he was building a house of prayer for all nations? Because this is the plan of conquest laid out throughout the entire Bible where the god of Israel wants to dominate the nations and destroy their gods and make them subservient to Israel. Check out the chapter in Isaiah dealing with Egypt’s blessing - just because it is called a ‘blessing’ in the Bible doesn’t make it any such thing.
In that chapter the god of Israel subverted Egypt, used the old divide and conquer tactic, sowed division, ruined agriculture, brought Egypt to its knees and then played the hero, making it swear fealty to the Israelite god. It’s subversive conquest plain and simple, and it’s called a ‘blessing’. It’s the same exact thing.
If the Jews sold you a turd by calling it a chocolate bar would it make it so? Would you eat it!
No it doesn’t.
It’s not ‘The Jews’ who killed Jesus but a sect of them. The entire Bible story is Jewish. Romans and other gentiles have cameos. The only people Jesus addressed were his fellow Jews, sit from some notable exceptions which only prove the rule.
The Bible does NOT tell you to rebel against the world. Jesus said give to Caesar what is Caesars and what does Paul say on Romans 13:1.
Calling believers in Christ the chosen ones is just a continuation of the Old Testament referring to Jews as the chosen. This is because is it - Jesus only ministered to Jews and he instructed his disciples to stay away from the non Jews. It is only because of Paul that loads of gentiles were hoodwinked into accepting the god of Israel as their own and the Jewish messiah as somehow being their own too.
However, nowhere in the Old Testament and in none of Jesus direct sayings will you be able to find any mention that they are remotely interested in anybody other than the Jews.
Wouldn't you think the highest intelligence would use very punctuated demonstrations of his power and would be able to appear in any form anytime he wished, once people recognize that the form is not the whole being?>
No, I don’t believe the higher power is not anthropomorphic in any way and I don’t believe it is personal at all. I don’t believe it is interactive in the sense that it would reach out to humans if you know what I mean. I believe it to be more like something humans have to raise themselves up to or find within. The connection with it is strictly one way - humans to it, not it to humans.
Did you want to look at specific Scriptures Jesus upheld to see if they actually say all the nations that don't serve Israel would be utterly wasted? Seems like the literalist Christians are just fine with them, as if they might not say what you think. I mean, your idea that he called Gentiles dogs and swine as if racial seems just as invalid as others' idea that he called Jews vipers and foxes as if racial. So you may need to work with the text a bit to see if we read texts the same way.>
Jesus upheld ALL of the scriptures. Where He deviated from them he mostly only done so to make them even more restrictive or weakening than they previously were, such as where he declared that adultery is committed if a man even so much as looks at a woman lustfully, or where he encouraged his audience (Jews by the way) to submit themselves to enemies and even to love them.
If we pretend that Jesus was real for a moment then nothing that he said should remotely lead you to believe that he cares for you if you are a non-Jew. The Great Commission is acknowledged to be a centuries later addition to the gospels. Jesus was clear and explicit that he was only there for the Israelites and instructed his disciples to stay away from the gentiles. In the sermon on the Mount he used gentiles as the example to his Jewish audience of what NOT to be like. Jesus did say that it is not appropriate to take the children’s (Jews) bread and cast it to the dogs (gentiles). Only deigning to the woman when she acknowledged her status as a comparative dog. When Jesus spoke against the Pharisees and Sadducees, this was an intra-Jewish critique, not a critique of Jews at large - because the Jews were his sole interest.
It’s a similar misunderstanding as that which occurs in the book of revelation whereby a lot of people misinterpret the passages about Jews who say they are Jews but are not, and Jews who are Jews in name only, as being about Jews at large. Whereas it is nothing of the sort - it is rebuking only ‘fake’ Jews ie Christian’s
Ugh, Jesus is one of their principal Psychological control mechanisms over the ‘sheepI’. How can you not see that?
How can you not see by Jesus own alleged words that he hates your guts if you are not an Israelite? You are a ‘dog’ and ‘swine’ And he is to rule in the midst of Israel’s enemies (ie from Rome) in order to cause bloodshed etc.
Jesus didn’t come to abolish the law or the prophets but to fulfill and not one jot or title shall pass until all be fulfilled - so that includes the nations that don’t serve Israel being utterly wasted as per Isaiah and plenty more anti-goy plans besides.
You need to eat his flesh and drink his blood - what’s wrong with that?
Remember, you are feted to foreswear your own ancestors in favour of the Israelites because you heard that god is with them.
So accept the messiah they conjured up for you and agree to eat the flesh and drink the blood, heathen!
There’s no such thing as paganism. Pagan is a collective term outsiders, for non-Christian’s, for disparate and unrelated peoples and religions etc. it functions the exact same way as goyim and kefir.
Christianity was spread by the sword. Native temples in Europe were destroyed, Rome forced Christianity just as Islam was forced on the Arabs.