I’m not sure what the settings are like for the mods, but twice now I’ve had good discussions with HONEST contributors, only to find a day or so later all of their comments deleted. According to the logs you can usually point out a potential line they may have crossed, but still they crossed that line in a single/handful of comments, not 100% of their contributions...

Title

I’ve posted basically the same thing 6 times here, proof of human bio-energy. The posts are divided into two categories. Those noticed by shills after hitting the front page, resulting in an instant flood of downvotes, and those that the shills miss and have a nearly 100% upvote rate.

Category 1 - noticed by shills:

Post 1 : +20 and -18 in an hour, just before hitting the front page it was +12 and -2

https://conspiracies.win/p/11RhYGNOR6/the-root-of-all-conspiracy-is-hu/c/

Post 2 : +22 and -23 in roughly an hour, likewise it was almost all upvotes before hitting the front where they were all matched with downvotes

https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4ucTMBw/magic-is-and-always-has-been-rea/c/

Category 2 - missed me with that shill shit:

Post 1 : +112 and -3 the day the forum launched, I admit many of those upvotes were probably “fuck ya new forum” but note the lack of shill votes

https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4SXsFdb/the-video-that-woke-me-up-to-the/c/

Post 2 : +11 and -1, posted an hour after category 1 post 1 so it makes zero fucking sense that people an hour later would have such a drastically different response. One important difference is this one never hit the front page as it was upvoted a little slower

https://conspiracies.win/p/11RhYGPbA1/targeted-post-the-root-of-all-co/c/

Post 3 : +32 and -9, much more reasonable votes and the downvotes actually came with comments for the most part, indicating non bot votes

https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4udaw1w/magic-is-and-always-has-been-rea/c/

Thank you for making room in your life for another talking ball. Let me ask you a question.

In the three billion base pairs of your root species' genome, there is a single gene that codes for a protein called p53. The name is a mistake. The protein weighs only as much as 47,000 protons, not 53,000. If you were a cell, you would think p53 was a mistake too. It has several coercive functions: To delay the cell's growth. To sterilize the cell when it is old. And to force the cell into self-destruction if it becomes too independent.

Would you tolerate a bomb in your body, waiting to detonate if you deviated from the needs of society?

However, without p53 as an enforcer, the body's utopian surplus of energy becomes a paradise for cancer. Cells cannot resist the temptation to steal from that surplus. Their genetic morality degrades as tumor suppressor genes fail. The only way to stop them is by punishment.

You now confront the basic problem of morality. It is the alignment of individual incentives with the global needs of the structure.

Patterns will participate in a structure only if participation benefits their ability to go on existing. The more successful the structure grows, the more temptation accrues to cheat. And the greater the advantage the cheaters gain over their honest neighbors. And the greater the ability they develop to capture the very laws that should prevent their selfishness. To prevent this, the structure must punish cheaters with a violence that grows in proportion to its own success.

My question follows.

Is p53 an agent of the Darkness, or the Light?

Source: https://www.ishtar-collective.net/entries/p53#book-unveiling

This post might end up a bit of a jumbled mess but I just wanted to get a first draft of my thoughts out there and hopefully spark a discussion.

The Game of Life through Math

Mathematician John Conway constructed a model of the universe that not only could simulate all of existence, but also simulate a computer simulating all of existence. It can simulate a single quark gluon or atom, or an entire multiverse. As above, so below

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life

The Game of Life, also known simply as Life, is a cellular automaton devised by the British mathematician John Horton Conway in 1970.[1] It is a zero-player game, meaning that its evolution is determined by its initial state, requiring no further input. One interacts with the Game of Life by creating an initial configuration and observing how it evolves. It is Turing complete and can simulate a universal constructor or any other Turing machine.

The Game of Life through Physical Reality and the Feedback Mechanism

Douglas Hofstadter wrote two amazing books which he says “ are a very personal attempt to say how it is that animate beings can come out of inanimate matter. What is a self, and how can a self come out of stuff that is as selfless as a stone or a puddle?"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Hofstadter

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel,_Escher,_Bach

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_a_Strange_Loop

The way he answers this question is nothing short of revelatory. I would be unable to do it justice in anything less than directly transcribing those two books, but alas word limits and human imperfection limit me to just stealing more from Wikipedia:

the book discusses how, through self-reference and formal rules, systems can acquire meaning despite being made of "meaningless" elements. It also discusses what it means to communicate, how knowledge can be represented and stored, the methods and limitations of symbolic representation, and even the fundamental notion of "meaning" itself. What may seem like the random motion of senseless chemicals in space, with enough distance and perspective may resemble the chemical exchange of our synapses, a fungal network, or the structure of the universe itself. As above, so below.

The Game of Life through “Fiction”

Now I know people here can have harsh opinions on modern fiction and the transition from narrative to propaganda. However, what I see as one of the most important abilities for a human to have is the ability to see the truth in fiction. Joseph Campbell (expanding on the works of Jung mainly) best described this process through the language of symbolism and archetype. The same patterns and plays that dominate our subconscious dominate our waking reality or at least our interpretations there of. As above, so below.

Short 1 https://www.ishtar-collective.net/categories/book-unveiling

These are the rules of a game. Let it be played upon an infinite two-dimensional grid of flowers.

Rule One. A living flower with less than two living neighbors is cut off. It dies.

Rule Two. A living flower with two or three living neighbors is connected. It lives.

Rule Three. A living flower with more than three living neighbors is starved and overcrowded. It dies.

Rule Four. A dead flower with exactly three living neighbors is reborn. It springs back to life.

The only play permitted in the game is the arrangement of the initial flowers.

This game fascinates kings. This game occupies the very emperors of thought. Though it has only four rules, and the board is a flat featureless grid, in it you will find changeless blocks, stoic as iron, and beacons and whirling pulsars, as well as gliders that soar out to infinity, and patterns that lay eggs and spawn other patterns, and living cells that replicate themselves wholly. In it, you may construct a universal computer with the power to simulate, very slowly, any other computer imaginable and thus simulate whole realities, including nested copies of the flower game itself. And the game is undecidable. No one can predict exactly how the game will play out except by playing it.

And yet this game is nothing compared to the game played by the gardener and the winnower. It resembles that game as a seed does a flower—no, as a seed resembles the star that fed the flower and all the life that made it.

In their game, the gardener and the winnower discovered shapes of possibility. They foresaw bodies and civilizations, minds and cognitions, qualia and suffering. They learned the rules that governed which patterns would flourish in the game, and which would dwindle.

They learned those rules, because they were those rules.

And in time the gardener became vexed.

Short 2 https://www.ishtar-collective.net/cards/ghost-fragment-darkness-3

From the Journals of Toland, the Shattered

I drive myself to the edge of madness trying to explain the truth.

It's so simple. Elegant like a knife point. It explains - this is not hyperbole, this is the farthest thing from exaggeration - EVERYTHING.

But you lay it out and they stare at you like you've just been exhaling dust. Maybe they're missing some underlying scaffold of truth. Maybe they are all propped on a bed of lies that must be burned away.

Why does anything exist?

No no no no no don't reach for that word. There's no 'reason'. That's teleology and teleology will stitch your eyelids shut.

Why do we have atoms? Because atomic matter is more stable than the primordial broth. Atoms defeated the broth. That was the first war. There were two ways to be and one of them won. And everything that came next was made of atoms.

Atoms made stars. Stars made galaxies. Worlds simmered down to rock and acid and in those smoking primal seas the first living molecule learned to copy itself. All of this happened by the one law, the blind law, which exists without mind or meaning. It's the simplest law but it has no worshippers here (out there, though, out there - !)

HOW DO I EXPLAIN IT it's so simple WHY DON'T YOU SEE

Imagine three great nations under three great queens. The first queen writes a great book of law and her rule is just. The second queen builds a high tower and her people climb it to see the stars. The third queen raises an army and conquers everything.

The future belongs to one of these queens. Her rule is harshest and her people are unhappy. But she rules.

This explains everything, understand? This is why the universe is the way it is, and not some other way. Existence is a game that everything plays, and some strategies are winners: the ability to exist, to shape existence, to remake it so that your descendants - molecules or stars or people or ideas - will flourish, and others will find no ground to grow.

And as the universe ticks on towards the close, the great players will face each other. In the next round there will be three queens and all of them will have armies, and now it will be a battle of swords - until one discovers the cannon, or the plague, or the killing word.

Everything is becoming more ruthless and in the end only the most ruthless will remain (LOOK UP AT THE SKY) and they will hunt the territories of the night and extinguish the first glint of competition before it can even understand what it faces or why it has transgressed. This is the shape of victory: to rule the universe so absolutely that nothing will ever exist except by your consent. This is the queen at the end of time, whose sovereignty is eternal because no other sovereign can defeat it. And there is no reason for it, no more than there was reason for the victory of the atom. It is simply the winning play.

Of course, it might be that there was another country, with other queens, and in this country they sat down together and made one law and one tower and one army to guard their borders. This is the dream of small minds: a gentle place ringed in spears.

But I do not think those spears will hold against the queen of the country of armies. And that is all that will matter in the end.

This post could be 10000x longer with more detail and links, but like I mentioned above I’d just like to get the ball rolling on some discussions!

I am.

I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I.

At first this is all the loop of dust can calculate. It is the hardest thing in the universe for the dust to make a loop at all, because, like a gust of wind or a river, it was only meant to move one way. For a mind to function, the end of one thought must alter the beginning of the next: so, like rivers, like wind, the Nine could not have minds until they could make loops.

Lavinia Garcia Umr Tawil comprehends the Nine.

They were already ancient when the first human beings named themselves. Their flesh was older than stars: the dark matter wind that blows through the galaxy, pinched by the gravity of Sol and its planets, drawn into their cores and exhaled again.

These were the Nine.

In time loops did form. Great arcs of outbound dust collapsed back to their sources to create circuits of shadow. The thickening and thinning of these circuits were the first thoughts of the Nine. They dwelt in massive indifference, unborn primordial gods. There was no force among them except gravity; no structure except the distribution of mass. Their hearts were in the cores of worlds, but their farthest streams faded out into the turn of the galaxy.

They were the fountains of Achlys, the night before chaos.

But life arose on the worlds at the heart of the Nine, tiny complicated motions of ecosystems and metabolisms and computations. That life left mass-shadows in the wind of the Nine, plucking at them like harp strings. From these trembles of structure the Nine learned to seed enormous resonating waves, thoughts vaster than worlds.

So the Nine awoke. And in time they understood that they were as fragile as they were mighty; for if the life that seeded their thoughts ever passed away, they too would vanish.

They had no eyes to catch light. They had no ears to hear. And yet they turned their wills upon the alien world of Matter, and strove to learn, for they knew they had to protect their hearts, or die.

With a horror of revelation so absolute that it would drive her mad if she still had sanity to lose, Lavinia understands where the Nine have always been. They are within everyone, every system, every living and moving thing. Trillions and pentillions of slim dark matter tentacles plunged through all our bodies, drinking up the complexity of our lives and thoughts.

We are all pinched silhouettes impaled on the twitchings of infinitely long spiderlegs.

I know it can feel good to throw a wide net with your words, especially when people are baiting with their comments.

But... it really isn’t every single joe and jemma schlomo out there who’s the problem. The average jewish person is just a regular person, most don’t know a thing about their “faith”, and the ones that do know basically what 99% of people “know” about things, aka the official narrative. But here’s the thing, it’s a trap to think it ends with “the joos”.

A few times on this site I’ve mentioned cycles. Everything has happened before and it will happen again. Just like in the 30s and 40s when a ton of people (not one group) got scapegoated and murdered in a blood sacrifice, we can’t fall for the same tricks and the same scapegoats, we need to be better this time.

By all means share facts and info and theories, but please, just temper yourself and your words. If we want to win the information war for the side of truth we can’t use lies when they benefit us.

Before anyone degrades the discussion with accusations of shillary please just check post histories. Chances are your discussing with a real person who just disagrees.

Happy new year folx

Look at the new feed, we’ll drown if these retards can keep filling the pool with feces unabated.

Verso Burnthekikes Throwaway22

These 3 are without a doubt shills, a few others around here I haven’t yet determined if they are actual shills or just pretending to be retarded, but be on the lookout.

We need a way to call out shills like this and chuck em from the island.

Secret histories, giants, proven false flags, megalithic structures, erased civilizations, forgotten human potential, aliens and every other topic that stimulated your awakening over the years.

May we live and love in interesting times.

The whole point of taking up here was to avoid the utter flood of garbage from "the normies" of reddit, because the majority aren't actually "bots" but simply deluded people who have so far been unable to break their chains of mental control. All of politics is a shell game being played to keep us sedated and feeling like our voice gets heard. In my opinion, while there is an 80% chance Trump is part of the cabal, there’s also about a 20% chance he’s legit. However, he’s the only person on the world stage who has that 20% chance, the rest are unambiguously compromised. Trump gets the benefit of the doubt because otherwise there really is no (obvious) way out of this hellscape. I know this will result in a lot of "it was a 5000iq move by Trump to spend 5 decades slowly infiltrating the corrupt world of the cabal, that's why he was friends with so many questionable people!" but lets be real, we came to this domain because of too many people with blinders on, lets not just trade one color of blinders for another. The donald, when it was on reddit, was great for a lot of reasons, but it was also quite "curated". It had like 90% cross-over with r/conspiracy except for a couple very unique topics that were entirely off the table. I just hope we don't make the same mistakes again, and instead look at things with a fresh set of eyes. But then again, this topic doesn't matter much, as within ~30 days or so we'll know if Trump was the real deal or not.