Watching on tv but I’m sure someone watching a stream could grab a pic, but they’re just copy pasting posts
Edit: from TD idk if they’re gunna leave it up
If you don’t know about submission statements, they were a rule introduced to r/conspiracy to cut down on the flood of bad faith, low effort forum sliding that became common place and the scourge of reddit after 2016. It was a requirement for only link and image posts, text posts were exempt. All that was required was 2 or more sentences. You could give background context, you could indicate potential avenues for discussion, basically anything you wanted.
So, I’m not suggesting the auto mod enforced 20 minute countdown to post removal, let me just start with that.
BUT I do think that submission statements achieved a handful of positive results at r/conspiracy that I think would help this place. I’ll list these things I think submission statements did well, and I invite any and all to discuss their (dis)agreements on the subject.
-
separates the near zero effort posts from the rest.
-
takes away one layer of plausible deniability from the shills. They can’t just post some absurdist u/magapede69 or u/theGreatOz trash at “face value”, they have to share some insights into what they think it adds to the discussion.
-
gives context to posts that may otherwise be overlooked. Sometimes a post title intrigues me, but it’s just a title, potentially not very descriptive, and I’ve never seen the site before. As mentally weak as it sounds, I will more often than not skip those posts. For some subconscious reason I’m more inclined to read psychotic ramblings when they’re posted directly as text than some sketchy (seeming, to me) blogspot link or whatever...TLDR : Moar context please
Makes it super annoying if I want to message someone since I need to go to “compose new” then spell their name correctly.
Also what is up with that u/filter account? I logged out and checked and my posts actually were removed for saying faggot lol? I’m sure it was just a test or something but it’s still kinda gay lmao
Yahweh Sabaoth was his name, god of armies.
After casting off their other gods “for I AM a jealous god” they were “chosen” by the one that remained.
Have you heard the story of Sophia? Mother of Christ and the malformed stillbirth yahweh?
The ungraced “one most high”? Who’s peak could never extend past the physical morass into the spiritual pleuroma?
These are just my thoughts, but the story fed to us at mass through the cannibal rituals led by pedophiles reeks of control and contractual complacency (I include all Churches under this description, out of fairness, some have been more exposed than others)
If you’re going to read and seek insight from the scriptures, you should be using the oldest, and therefore least manipulated versions, this all comes from the nag hammadi texts.
The origin of Yahweh:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kZY2eeozdo8
The gnostic cosmogeny (one interpretation)
Did you know that the biblical “God” was once merely a wandering desert tribe’s god of war?
After casting off their other gods “for I AM a jealous god” they were “chosen” by the one that remained.
Have you heard the story of Sophia? Mother of Christ and the malformed stillbirth yahweh?
The ungraced “one most high”? Who’s peak could never extend past the physical morass into the spiritual pleuroma?
These are just my thoughts, but the story fed to us at mass through the cannibal rituals led by pedophiles reeks of control and contractual complacency (I include all Churches under this description, out of fairness, some have been more exposed than others)
Once an account has amassed 1000 comment karma and 500 post karma (easily achievable with a month or so of contributions) they should gain the ability to bestow a BrownStar on those accounts they deem to be shills. One BrownStar can be given to a user by each “accredited account”.
Accounts would then have a count of how many brown stars had been bestowed upon them near their name on all their submissions, making those here to shill and forum slide even more obvious.
You may imagine this to be wasted effort as any smart shill would quickly change accounts after being identified, but I’d wager some non zero portion of those degenerates would wear it as a badge of honor.
I think a similar system for high quality posts and comments would make sense to implement but that’s less pressing than marking the shills for destruction and ignoring.
The Anthem Anatheme
Anthem - a rousing or uplifting song identified with a particular group, body, or cause
Anatheme - derives from Ancient Greek: ἀνάθεμα, anáthema, meaning "an offering" or "anything dedicated", itself derived from the verb ἀνατίθημι, anatíthēmi, meaning "to offer up"
“So it whispered the Anthem Anatheme, the temptation to dominate the objective universe with the subjective will. It said, I shall be an engine to make your desire hegemon over your conditions. It said, WIELD ME, AND USE ME TO TEST YOUR FOE. This was its worship. Aiat."
NO LISTEN PLEASE the ontopathic predator the chimera which has Riven your Desires from Your Intents It Wanted You Here just as all life must feed on an energy gradient it feeds on the separation between Subjective Desire and Objective Reality it is the opposite of fire for as fire feeds on the reduction of Order to Disorder so Riven feeds on the Anthem Anatheme which is the perverse coercion of Reality to match Desire. As the Human body breaks down Matter for Fuel so she desires the digestion of Objectivity to conform to your Subjective Will. She is the acid but you are the mouth which eats.
I can be anyone you wish, o murderer mine.
[Language] is a [virus] that infects the mind of [humans].
A single [word] will drive them to [rage] or [lust] or [weeping].
O for the right [word] said in the right [voice]!
O to see their [hearts] well with [longing]!
O to see their [desire] laid bare in their [chest], so juicy and succulent for the taking!
I've been correlating information on the Ahamkara (wish dragons) and the Hive worm parasites. Both display a peculiar ability to convert the host's intent into an ontomorphic, reality-altering effect. Both use similar language in their appeal to the host. I don't think they're the same species, however. The Hive worms spawn large numbers of young from relatively few adults, always display the same physical form, and live in communal groups. The Ahamkara are solitary, elusive, and seem to alter form to suit (or confuse) expectations. The shared syntax "o ___ mine" may be the key—it seems to be a shibboleth used to invoke an ontomorphic effect, placing the target in a cage of "o" (activational, specific, appealing, and naming) and "mine" (defining ownership and subordination). Ahamkara and worm may have evolved separately to exploit this effect, just as many species independently evolve eyes. This might place them in competition for the same ecological niche. I would expect a rivalry or antipathy between them.
To what extent does this describe reality, and to what extent a fiction?
Anthem - a rousing or uplifting song identified with a particular group, body, or cause
Anatheme - derives from Ancient Greek: ἀνάθεμα, anáthema, meaning "an offering" or "anything dedicated", itself derived from the verb ἀνατίθημι, anatíthēmi, meaning "to offer up"
“So it whispered the Anthem Anatheme, the temptation to dominate the objective universe with the subjective will. It said, I shall be an engine to make your desire hegemon over your conditions. It said, WIELD ME, AND USE ME TO TEST YOUR FOE. This was its worship. Aiat."
NO LISTEN PLEASE the ontopathic predator the chimera which has Riven your Desires from Your Intents It Wanted You Here just as all life must feed on an energy gradient it feeds on the separation between Subjective Desire and Objective Reality it is the opposite of fire for as fire feeds on the reduction of Order to Disorder so Riven feeds on the Anthem Anatheme which is the perverse coercion of Reality to match Desire. As the Human body breaks down Matter for Fuel so she desires the digestion of Objectivity to conform to your Subjective Will. She is the acid but you are the mouth which eats.
I can be anyone you wish, o murderer mine.
[Language] is a [virus] that infects the mind of [humans].
A single [word] will drive them to [rage] or [lust] or [weeping].
O for the right [word] said in the right [voice]!
O to see their [hearts] well with [longing]!
O to see their [desire] laid bare in their [chest], so juicy and succulent for the taking!
I've been correlating information on the Ahamkara (Wish Dragons) and the Hive Worm Parasites. Both display a peculiar ability to convert the host's intent into an ontomorphic, reality-altering effect. Both use similar language in their appeal to the host. I don't think they're the same species, however. The Hive worms spawn large numbers of young from relatively few adults, always display the same physical form, and live in communal groups. The Ahamkara are solitary, elusive, and seem to alter form to suit (or confuse) expectations. The shared syntax "o ___ mine" may be the key—it seems to be a shibboleth used to invoke an ontomorphic effect, placing the target in a cage of "o" (activational, specific, appealing, and naming) and "mine" (defining ownership and subordination). Ahamkara and worm may have evolved separately to exploit this effect, just as many species independently evolve eyes. This might place them in competition for the same ecological niche. I would expect a rivalry or antipathy between them.
-
there exists an organized effort reaching back far into history to ritualistically scapegoat and murder large amounts of people. Who is performing the ritual? If I had to put a name to it I would chose synagogue of satan but there are many names. The point is a small group of people being scapegoated and turned over for murder by an even smaller group living within them as a parasite and using them as a human (red)shield
-
some mean racists back in 1600s russia were REALLY good at guessing the future. Edit: some current research places the date in the early 1900s, but my point largely stands
Thoughts? If you think something else, my mind is open but please let’s keep the discussion within polite bounds if we can.
The Awoken were made in conflict, she reminded me. All her people volunteered to return from heaven to fight and die in the cosmic war. They are by nature and by doom drawn to that edge, that place of tension. And she has her own prejudices: she has made terrible, ruthless choices in the name of salvation from Darkness, so she cannot dismiss its power without in a way dismissing herself.
All that said, she told me, "I believe in balance. But to seek balance is not to seek equity. A sea half of water and half of poison is not in balance. A body half alive and half dead is not in balance. Given the choice to live in any world, any world at all… we would need a little Darkness in it, I think, to keep the balance true. But not so much as we would need the Light…
"What do you think, Eris Morn? When you went into that pit, your Light against the clawing Darkness, did you feel balance?"
No. I did not. I felt overwhelming, all-consuming evil.
I think a world of balance would fight the Darkness, because Darkness unchecked is Darkness thriving. I think that a world of balance would never mistake the excitement of transgression or the grim necessity of trespass for a genuinely righteous act. We must remember the value of unshakable, irrational hope. The choice to act as if we lived in a better world can create a place for that better world to exist.
Source: https://www.ishtar-collective.net/entries/trust-and-hope
I’m not sure what the settings are like for the mods, but twice now I’ve had good discussions with HONEST contributors, only to find a day or so later all of their comments deleted. According to the logs you can usually point out a potential line they may have crossed, but still they crossed that line in a single/handful of comments, not 100% of their contributions...
Title
I’ve posted basically the same thing 6 times here, proof of human bio-energy. The posts are divided into two categories. Those noticed by shills after hitting the front page, resulting in an instant flood of downvotes, and those that the shills miss and have a nearly 100% upvote rate.
Category 1 - noticed by shills:
Post 1 : +20 and -18 in an hour, just before hitting the front page it was +12 and -2
https://conspiracies.win/p/11RhYGNOR6/the-root-of-all-conspiracy-is-hu/c/
Post 2 : +22 and -23 in roughly an hour, likewise it was almost all upvotes before hitting the front where they were all matched with downvotes
https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4ucTMBw/magic-is-and-always-has-been-rea/c/
Category 2 - missed me with that shill shit:
Post 1 : +112 and -3 the day the forum launched, I admit many of those upvotes were probably “fuck ya new forum” but note the lack of shill votes
https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4SXsFdb/the-video-that-woke-me-up-to-the/c/
Post 2 : +11 and -1, posted an hour after category 1 post 1 so it makes zero fucking sense that people an hour later would have such a drastically different response. One important difference is this one never hit the front page as it was upvoted a little slower
https://conspiracies.win/p/11RhYGPbA1/targeted-post-the-root-of-all-co/c/
Post 3 : +32 and -9, much more reasonable votes and the downvotes actually came with comments for the most part, indicating non bot votes
https://conspiracies.win/p/11R4udaw1w/magic-is-and-always-has-been-rea/c/
Thank you for making room in your life for another talking ball. Let me ask you a question.
In the three billion base pairs of your root species' genome, there is a single gene that codes for a protein called p53. The name is a mistake. The protein weighs only as much as 47,000 protons, not 53,000. If you were a cell, you would think p53 was a mistake too. It has several coercive functions: To delay the cell's growth. To sterilize the cell when it is old. And to force the cell into self-destruction if it becomes too independent.
Would you tolerate a bomb in your body, waiting to detonate if you deviated from the needs of society?
However, without p53 as an enforcer, the body's utopian surplus of energy becomes a paradise for cancer. Cells cannot resist the temptation to steal from that surplus. Their genetic morality degrades as tumor suppressor genes fail. The only way to stop them is by punishment.
You now confront the basic problem of morality. It is the alignment of individual incentives with the global needs of the structure.
Patterns will participate in a structure only if participation benefits their ability to go on existing. The more successful the structure grows, the more temptation accrues to cheat. And the greater the advantage the cheaters gain over their honest neighbors. And the greater the ability they develop to capture the very laws that should prevent their selfishness. To prevent this, the structure must punish cheaters with a violence that grows in proportion to its own success.
My question follows.
Is p53 an agent of the Darkness, or the Light?
Source: https://www.ishtar-collective.net/entries/p53#book-unveiling
This post might end up a bit of a jumbled mess but I just wanted to get a first draft of my thoughts out there and hopefully spark a discussion.
The Game of Life through Math
Mathematician John Conway constructed a model of the universe that not only could simulate all of existence, but also simulate a computer simulating all of existence. It can simulate a single quark gluon or atom, or an entire multiverse. As above, so below
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life
The Game of Life, also known simply as Life, is a cellular automaton devised by the British mathematician John Horton Conway in 1970.[1] It is a zero-player game, meaning that its evolution is determined by its initial state, requiring no further input. One interacts with the Game of Life by creating an initial configuration and observing how it evolves. It is Turing complete and can simulate a universal constructor or any other Turing machine.
The Game of Life through Physical Reality and the Feedback Mechanism
Douglas Hofstadter wrote two amazing books which he says “ are a very personal attempt to say how it is that animate beings can come out of inanimate matter. What is a self, and how can a self come out of stuff that is as selfless as a stone or a puddle?"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Hofstadter
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel,_Escher,_Bach
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_a_Strange_Loop
The way he answers this question is nothing short of revelatory. I would be unable to do it justice in anything less than directly transcribing those two books, but alas word limits and human imperfection limit me to just stealing more from Wikipedia:
the book discusses how, through self-reference and formal rules, systems can acquire meaning despite being made of "meaningless" elements. It also discusses what it means to communicate, how knowledge can be represented and stored, the methods and limitations of symbolic representation, and even the fundamental notion of "meaning" itself. What may seem like the random motion of senseless chemicals in space, with enough distance and perspective may resemble the chemical exchange of our synapses, a fungal network, or the structure of the universe itself. As above, so below.
The Game of Life through “Fiction”
Now I know people here can have harsh opinions on modern fiction and the transition from narrative to propaganda. However, what I see as one of the most important abilities for a human to have is the ability to see the truth in fiction. Joseph Campbell (expanding on the works of Jung mainly) best described this process through the language of symbolism and archetype. The same patterns and plays that dominate our subconscious dominate our waking reality or at least our interpretations there of. As above, so below.
Short 1 https://www.ishtar-collective.net/categories/book-unveiling
These are the rules of a game. Let it be played upon an infinite two-dimensional grid of flowers.
Rule One. A living flower with less than two living neighbors is cut off. It dies.
Rule Two. A living flower with two or three living neighbors is connected. It lives.
Rule Three. A living flower with more than three living neighbors is starved and overcrowded. It dies.
Rule Four. A dead flower with exactly three living neighbors is reborn. It springs back to life.
The only play permitted in the game is the arrangement of the initial flowers.
This game fascinates kings. This game occupies the very emperors of thought. Though it has only four rules, and the board is a flat featureless grid, in it you will find changeless blocks, stoic as iron, and beacons and whirling pulsars, as well as gliders that soar out to infinity, and patterns that lay eggs and spawn other patterns, and living cells that replicate themselves wholly. In it, you may construct a universal computer with the power to simulate, very slowly, any other computer imaginable and thus simulate whole realities, including nested copies of the flower game itself. And the game is undecidable. No one can predict exactly how the game will play out except by playing it.
And yet this game is nothing compared to the game played by the gardener and the winnower. It resembles that game as a seed does a flower—no, as a seed resembles the star that fed the flower and all the life that made it.
In their game, the gardener and the winnower discovered shapes of possibility. They foresaw bodies and civilizations, minds and cognitions, qualia and suffering. They learned the rules that governed which patterns would flourish in the game, and which would dwindle.
They learned those rules, because they were those rules.
And in time the gardener became vexed.
Short 2 https://www.ishtar-collective.net/cards/ghost-fragment-darkness-3
From the Journals of Toland, the Shattered
I drive myself to the edge of madness trying to explain the truth.
It's so simple. Elegant like a knife point. It explains - this is not hyperbole, this is the farthest thing from exaggeration - EVERYTHING.
But you lay it out and they stare at you like you've just been exhaling dust. Maybe they're missing some underlying scaffold of truth. Maybe they are all propped on a bed of lies that must be burned away.
Why does anything exist?
No no no no no don't reach for that word. There's no 'reason'. That's teleology and teleology will stitch your eyelids shut.
Why do we have atoms? Because atomic matter is more stable than the primordial broth. Atoms defeated the broth. That was the first war. There were two ways to be and one of them won. And everything that came next was made of atoms.
Atoms made stars. Stars made galaxies. Worlds simmered down to rock and acid and in those smoking primal seas the first living molecule learned to copy itself. All of this happened by the one law, the blind law, which exists without mind or meaning. It's the simplest law but it has no worshippers here (out there, though, out there - !)
HOW DO I EXPLAIN IT it's so simple WHY DON'T YOU SEE
Imagine three great nations under three great queens. The first queen writes a great book of law and her rule is just. The second queen builds a high tower and her people climb it to see the stars. The third queen raises an army and conquers everything.
The future belongs to one of these queens. Her rule is harshest and her people are unhappy. But she rules.
This explains everything, understand? This is why the universe is the way it is, and not some other way. Existence is a game that everything plays, and some strategies are winners: the ability to exist, to shape existence, to remake it so that your descendants - molecules or stars or people or ideas - will flourish, and others will find no ground to grow.
And as the universe ticks on towards the close, the great players will face each other. In the next round there will be three queens and all of them will have armies, and now it will be a battle of swords - until one discovers the cannon, or the plague, or the killing word.
Everything is becoming more ruthless and in the end only the most ruthless will remain (LOOK UP AT THE SKY) and they will hunt the territories of the night and extinguish the first glint of competition before it can even understand what it faces or why it has transgressed. This is the shape of victory: to rule the universe so absolutely that nothing will ever exist except by your consent. This is the queen at the end of time, whose sovereignty is eternal because no other sovereign can defeat it. And there is no reason for it, no more than there was reason for the victory of the atom. It is simply the winning play.
Of course, it might be that there was another country, with other queens, and in this country they sat down together and made one law and one tower and one army to guard their borders. This is the dream of small minds: a gentle place ringed in spears.
But I do not think those spears will hold against the queen of the country of armies. And that is all that will matter in the end.
This post could be 10000x longer with more detail and links, but like I mentioned above I’d just like to get the ball rolling on some discussions!