1
Formergop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fortunately I'm not requesting anyone think for me. I simply requested that the person who directed me to the video, who obviously has better knowledge of the video, point out the specific section. Nothing more, nothing less.

1
Formergop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go through this thread. Another person, who believes the election was wrong directed me to a 7 hour youtube video that they presented that affidavit and that occurred in December

0
Formergop 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's very easy to look up the official audit report. And the Republicans in in Fulton county certified the results. No error rating. You aren't telling the truth.

-1
Formergop -1 points ago +1 / -2

I'll just finish with this. The voting machines that are used to cast votes, give printed paper receipts. In most States you can check the status of your vote. Pretty much everyone can check their vote for discrepancies. The tabulating machines that were used to scan paper ballots also can be checked. If this were in fact true, there would be an overwhelming amount of evidence. Look, I get it. You guys really have an affinity for Donald Trump. You like him for whatever reasons you all have. To reach their own. And yes, I totally understand that need and desire to find any information that directly aligns with your own beliefs. And admittedly I voted for him in 16. But, honestly, before this election, how many of you would lend credence to these now leading voices that are putting this conspiracy out there? Many of these people that are making this current conspiracy have a long history of conspiracy theories. Are these credible people? Is what they're saying irrefutable? I truly hope you stay close to your loved ones. "I disagree with what you said, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" -Voltaire I'm glad we could have a cordial discussion.

1
Formergop 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://mobile.twitter.com/OneAddyAdds/status/1347300940102172672/photo/2 I have the image on my phone but I guess I can't upload it? Idk. This is my first chat room experience. Sorry. Link provided though to his id

1
Formergop 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're gonna have to be a bit more specific. I'm not dedicating 7 hours of my day to watching a Senate hearing. I got a family, job, and better things to do. Much appreciated.

1
Formergop 1 point ago +1 / -0

The link you provided does in fact show the correct date format. There are others that aren't. No, unequivocally no, the EU does not allow for the recordings to be zoomed in unless there are multiple angles simultaneously recording. Next, as someone else had pointed out, this "affidavit" was presented to the Georgian Senate hearing in December 2020? But the date was January 2021? How? Try as I might, from adjusting brightness and contrast I'm unable to see any official letterhead. Yes, it would be sealed similarly to here in the USA with a notary to make it a legal document that this is a sworn legal statement given without coerce and if his free will in accordance with all local and state laws.

0
Formergop 0 points ago +1 / -1

In regards to #1, I'm sorry but I'm not sure what you mean. #2 I hadn't seen any that without a crease. If you have I'd be happy to have a look. #3 I don't know which state you're referring to, I only know PA, and here I can't think of any "bubble" it's a box. Also, I haven't seen other states with bubbles that had crescent shaped markings and I would certainly look at those as well. I have searched since reading you reply and I haven't come up with anything. Maybe if you could give me the particular state your referencing I could better find it

-2
Formergop -2 points ago +0 / -2

What do you believe I'm lying about? I'll try my best to accommodate you with the evidence. I obviously can't take you to my local polling place and show you the tabulators. You'll have to do that yourself. But I'm pretty sure I can accommodate the rest

-2
Formergop -2 points ago +1 / -3

Oh and giving something to Congress is really easy. You can literally go to your local rep or senator and hand them anything you like. You can even get them to mention you while on the floor. Hell, you can sometimes be mentioned in a bill. But delivering things to Congress is easier than getting a ps5 was

-3
Formergop -3 points ago +1 / -4

I gave facts. The only one here being dismissive is you. Also, the man in the video, he lives in Florida. He's 56. Hard to give a confession in Italy when he was in Florida on the day in question, isn't it? Look you don't have to like the facts but you can't dismiss them because they don't fit your narrative

0
Formergop 0 points ago +1 / -1

Okay, it's not a straw man fallacy. The purpose of the post is to show the there is a group of individuals connected via a pin. The pin on the surface or to the sheep is purported to mean income equality. The conspiracy claims that isn't the actual purpose. But income redistribution. Of which my earlier statement stand in fact directly addressing those issues. Next, Confucius didn't say such thing. No where in the Analects is that found. Last, I'll end with this. Symbols only have what meaning you apply to them. The crucifix to some is affixed to their religion. Now if you take that crucifix and put it on someone's lawn, the meaning totally changes. Still the same exact symbol.

-7
Formergop -7 points ago +1 / -8

There are so many problems with this, starting with the obvious. Italians speak Italian. They write in Italian. Next, for anyone who's never been outside of the US, Europeans use the d/m/y format for their dates. There is no official seal There is no official letterhead There is no printed name beneath the signature. These are required on legal documents in Italy as well The ID shown on other sites, is well expired. Confessional recordings aren't zoomed in. They record the entire room so that defense attorneys can't argue the defendant was being threatened out of view of the camera. The recordings are also done with a stationary camera. Paper ballots can't be hacked. The tabulating machines aren't connected to the internet.

1
Formergop 1 point ago +1 / -0

The analogy doesn't work. If you would've said your phone, I'd agree. But seeing as how I haven't had Facebook in over 10 years, just created a twitter account after the election, and only created this account today, social media isn't required to living a normal life.

-1
Formergop -1 points ago +1 / -2

Addressing the problems with the Italian letter.

  1. The date
  2. The signature. They're missing the printed name
  3. Italians speak Italian, not English. The form wouldn't be written in English.
  4. Italy has government seals just like every other government.
  5. In Italy, when you give a sworn statement it is on a paper that has an official letterhead.
  6. You cannot hack paper ballots and the tabulating machines aren't connected to the internet. I know this from working at my local polling center in 2016.
-4
Formergop -4 points ago +1 / -5

I see you're missing the point. They can't be clandestine and simultaneously be open. Secret organizations are just that, secret. They don't carry decoder rings. They don't wear insignias. And symbols aren't power. Each person perceives them different based on their history, meaning, motives, members, etc.

-3
Formergop -3 points ago +2 / -5

Because that would infuriate Senate, the house, and any remaining people on his side. He would undoubtedly be impeached.

1
Formergop 1 point ago +2 / -1

Just thinking, it's 2020, with very advanced technologies. If in fact they belong to a secret organization, why would they openly and collectively wear anything to show it? Honestly, we don't have undercover cops wearing badges. Spies don't have tattoos of their home country. I mean logically, if you were to belong to a secret organization would you wear anything to show to the world how large your group is?