Premise 1: Both Covid-19 and the Vaccine are dangerous (to the extend that they are dangerous) because of a problem the immune system has properly breaking down the spike proteins, so they linger beyond initial infection/response, doing damage.

Premise 2: Ivermectin is effective because it inhibits the spike protein's ability to do damage.

Conclusion 1: Ivermectin is not just an effective treatment for covid, but also for side effects of the vaccine

Premise 3: Pfizer is developing a new anti-viral drug (source) that works on the same principles as Ivermectin.

Premise 4: Pfizer won't pass up an opportunity to make their own patented drug for something, if its use is going to become critically important.

Conclusion 2: Pfizer knows that the vaccines are going to cause harm, so they are developing a proprietary ivermectin analog to mandate alongside vaccines.

Conclusion 3: This new drug will save the majority of the vaccinated population by protecting them from the spike proteins.

Conclusion 4: Depopulation is a threat, but not an intentional or planned one. It is foreseen and will be prevented. (In the most opportunistic way possible, but prevented nonetheless)

Conclusion 5: The world will not end. Everything will go back to normal, more or less. The vaccine will be credited for saving the world, despite being the thing that almost destroyed it. Pharma will get away scott free with billions of dollars in their back pocket.

Thoughts? This is just one idea about what could happen. It's been rolling around my head ever since I heard about the "Pfizermectin" and learned about why ivermectin supposedly works.