-6
Crescendo -6 points ago +2 / -8

Your obsession with Reddit is so tragic. Who fucking cares, let it go.

-5
Crescendo -5 points ago +2 / -7

Aww. It's okay, little boy. I know you had your mind blown by this entry-level propaganda, I'm sorry to have to come in and rain on your parade.

By the way, you are the one who came in hot with unsubstantiated autistic propaganda. You say that "the Jews" are taking advantage of this Wall Street Bets situation, so that would put the burden of proof on you to show that. Telling someone to watch a documentary is not a proper response.

-6
Crescendo -6 points ago +2 / -8

Zionist faggot? Look how quickly you meltdown when someone challenges the bullshit you’re pushing. Zeitgeist is propaganda 101. A few decent points but a lot of disinformation and deceptive editing. It’s made to seem deep to people of your intelligence level.

-6
Crescendo -6 points ago +2 / -8

I've seen Zeitgeist, it's a very basic propaganda film. If what you got out of watching it is "Jews are bad" then I guess you're the target demographic for something so reductive.

-11
Crescendo -11 points ago +2 / -13

r/showerthoughts

by pkvi
-6
Crescendo -6 points ago +1 / -7

I don't want you to prove a conspiracy theory, I asked for the slightest bit of substance to consider. You had to shift gears into pretentious babble to dodge the question. Making a wild assertion and having "it's obvious" be the thrust of your argument is simply not compelling, sorry.

-18
Crescendo -18 points ago +4 / -22

I was really hoping that after Trump left office, we'd see fewer posts where people pretend that Candace Owens is insightful.

by pkvi
-7
Crescendo -7 points ago +1 / -8

That's not how burden of proof works. I'm not here to debunk your theory, but I'd be curious to see anything you could provide that would back up your assertions. You've made it clear that you don't have that, so the conversation is over.

by pkvi
-13
Crescendo -13 points ago +1 / -14

That was a very roundabout way of saying "no."

by pkvi
-8
Crescendo -8 points ago +2 / -10

Can you show me? Saying "of course it is" is not an argument.

by pkvi
-13
Crescendo -13 points ago +1 / -14

Is that supposed to be some sort of gotcha? Just because the people who run these organizations are liberals doesn't mean that the entirety of their operation functions as a "slush fund for Democrats."

Is the Heritage Foundation a "slush fund for Republicans"?

by pkvi
-12
Crescendo -12 points ago +3 / -15

That isn't true. Don't try to lay some braindead ActBlue shit on me, thanks.

-2
Crescendo -2 points ago +1 / -3

Oh sorry, didn't realize that being interested in conspiracy theories meant I had to believe every crock of shit that someone lays on me.

-2
Crescendo -2 points ago +1 / -3

Is your IQ 12?

-7
Crescendo -7 points ago +1 / -8

A drug addict who was committing a slow suicide? Wait, don't tell me -- he was about to expose the deep state too???

by pkvi
0
Crescendo 0 points ago +3 / -3

Are you self-aware enough to see how this quote is pointed directly at you as well?

view more: ‹ Prev