That's not how burden of proof works. I'm not here to debunk your theory, but I'd be curious to see anything you could provide that would back up your assertions. You've made it clear that you don't have that, so the conversation is over.
I don't want you to prove a conspiracy theory, I asked for the slightest bit of substance to consider. You had to shift gears into pretentious babble to dodge the question. Making a wild assertion and having "it's obvious" be the thrust of your argument is simply not compelling, sorry.
That's not how burden of proof works. I'm not here to debunk your theory, but I'd be curious to see anything you could provide that would back up your assertions. You've made it clear that you don't have that, so the conversation is over.
I don't want you to prove a conspiracy theory, I asked for the slightest bit of substance to consider. You had to shift gears into pretentious babble to dodge the question. Making a wild assertion and having "it's obvious" be the thrust of your argument is simply not compelling, sorry.