I remember reading a post on reddit about her, even went to her twitter. I was telling a friend about her and he asked who she was and I unfortunately forget her name. I tried searching the web but search results are full of bullshit

I swear the design of pillows could be better to allow more steady airflow to the brain and more comfort. I think I've seen Eastern beds where they have very small and thin pillows. This really looks like the right thing. My gut tells me that the giant and fat pillows Americans use is making them more dumb because it makes them sleep with their neck tilted down towards their feet, restricting airflow. You really only need an inch or so to support the head, not 3-5 inches. I am not a sleep scientist or whatever they are called. I'm just a normal guy with an opinion.

If this were true, I'd imagine it would be complete aids to find the truth and research via search engines which are riddled with shilled articles, same with mattress info.

I'm sure both sides got their hands dirty.

Do they have some kind of computer algorithm that scan everything we type or speak and checks for key words?

Alex Jones shed a lot of light on the fact that the CIA or whoever will pay people such as veterans with PTSD to go to these peaceful rallies and purposefully make them unpeaceful. I'm curious how escalated they might make this rally and if shots will be fired near the White House. What would be the most fucked up scenario that could happen that the media would love to politicize?

No evidence just wild speculation cause this is something that would happen in America. With marijuana becoming state legalized across the U.S. and covid keeping people inside, I would expect people are going to prison less these days. Not to mention Alex Jones shed light on the government paying people to vandalize things in peaceful protests years ago.

I think we can agree if you are trying to steal an election the last thing you want people to do is congregate and rally. You would rather isolate them in their homes so their only interaction with the outside world is through heavily propagandized social media. This way extreme ideas flourish and the biggest spenders on advertisements are most likely to win the votes. Now if the title of this post is true, would that make the people puppeteering Biden a global terrorist organization by unleashing a global pandemic in order to sway a few local votes?

I want to state that I regularly visit psychiatrists every 2-3 years for "sanity checkups" for my own piece of mind and feeling more confident against people dismissing my opinions by attacking my character saying I am mentally ill/schizo etc. I have been censored many times, but the other day I was censored just by talking about the how I get banned for speaking my opinion on Discord. I didn't even go into the specific opinions and I won't here either.

Say I hold an opinion (the specific opinion really doesn't matter) that goes against the narrative just slightly. I choose to share this opinion with others on social media. The response is probably 70% hate, 25% love, or 5% neutral comments. Many people will pretend to comment a loveful comment but it is usually only to protect their name and the hate is just masked behind false words. When I talk about the metas of holding radicalized opinions, I assume that most people feel uncomfortable when confronted with close-to-objective truths or counter-bias statements.

So I shared this opinion. A few things usually happen. It is possible to be banned immediately on sight, with no discussion. The most obvious examples of this are spewing racial slurs but you could probably get instantly banned for saying things like "Trump 2020" in a Biden echo-chamber, and vice versa. The people who get banned this way will feel alienated, angry, and question their own thinking. It' seems like the last thing the global narrative wants you to do is think independently.

What else could happen after sharing a controversial opinion? You could be argued against! Which is great!...but only if done right. You can't really take any arguments seriously when people say "well I read an article once that states x" without mentioning anything about the article name, authors, or any credibility. Ask yourself can you expect people to research and pull citations out for every argument they make on the internet though? Not really. So discussions on the internet tend to be a battle of opinions, biasis, and with little credible sources backing up their arguments. One of the worst offenders is r/science. You argue with them anyway. Assuming you stand your ground on your opinions and don't budge, the person(s) you are arguing with will likely call the chat moderators for your removal. Okay, so now you were just banned for defending and hashing out what you think against a 3rd party. You will likely feel that you have been treated unfairly and will double down on whatever opinion you hold because you were not allowed to reasonably discuss it.

The third and rare option is you find a person(s) who neutrally argues with your opinion. This person explores the idea of believing what you believe and it's effects on the world and perspective. You both understand you are not at war with each other but battling for truth and a clear perspective on the world. You may share credible sources with each other and discuss the nuances of sources that might not be very credible. At the end of the argument, the participants in the discussion will come out feeling more confident about their stance on that particular opinion and will likely reference what was discussed in future discussions in a sort of chain link of strengthened and weakened opinions.

The fourth option is where you find yourself not welcome to the internet. All the locations for discussion alienate you and reject you the moment you speak 'wrong think'. Under normal circumstances you may seek places in real life to discuss your opinions with other likeminded persons such as a philosophy club, bar, or a random stranger at the mall. Unfortunately, most places are closed due to COVID-19. What does that mean?

Having no where to discuss your ideas on the internet or real life may lead a person to rapid progression towards radicalism and extremisms. That person may double down on the belief that nobody will listen to him and look for ways to be heard, violent, illegal, or whatever. This stage is very unpredictable and dangerous. I am guessing many fall into substance abuse issues and other unhealthy forms of escapism due to not feeling like a full human being. Having a 3rd party opinion on your opinions is crucial to human thought. Without a 3rd party opinion, you will have little sense between societies 'right' and 'wrong' and will be cast out of it or imprisoned and given no chance to continue your bloodline or survive.

I'm glad r/conspiracy has moved here and I feel very welcome even if I am a delusional nut or enlightened being. (Are those one in the same?)

I encourage you to discuss censorship with people you know in real life and show them free-er speech platforms like this one. The last thing you want to see is a loved one making life destroying decisions based off the emotions from not feeling like they have a voice. Having a voice and getting neutral critiques of it is one of the most liberating feelings and remember that we are strong in numbers. Do not let them conquer and divide.