I already told you to drop your Madam Chloe impersonation, you fail.

Quit being such a faggot while you're at it.

Yes. Working furiously. Our Federal Reserve was created in 1913 with the goal of destroying the Nation. The elite have run out of patience with the resiliency of the US workforce.

Notice that insurgencies have prevented US policy from being imposed. An insurgency by the US people would be many orders of magnitude more difficult to subdue.

Totally irrational. False dichotomy.

Here, with 0 changes in public policy or store policy, we went from me rarely seeing another person without a mask to the opposite. It's now hard to find anybody in a mask. Finally! How long this will last I don't predict. Heating season here starts before November.

I really don't expect our government to abolish itself. Please do realize that any such collapse is eagerly awaited by many foreign powers ready to swoop in. Covidiots vs free folk would be the smallest of skirmishes.

You're drawing some false parallels. The white army engaged in its own atrocities, which contributed to their numbers declining rapidly. Anti covidiots haven't actually killed people en masse. Also, this axis of polarization isn't really the main split.

Hopefully we can prevent that from becoming racial. There's certainly lots of money thrown at trying to start a race war. I'm not sure if we've made any progress in quieting that down, or if it's intensifying.

You are presenting as very angry

Only in your imagination, which is perverse.

Quit the madam chloe act.

Ah! The racial component may become true in 20 some years. We do have brutal realities in our future, and shirking our duty to confront them continues to make it worse.

I disagree that the previous 3 administrations are a reasonable comparison to the Tsars. The current mess? Bidet has ALWAYS handed China whatever they want. Harass won't interfere.

There is no shortage of hostile funding. I doubt much (if any) of that comes from either Russia or UK governments. China may be different story?

Your assessment of whites is ridiculous. We are over 60%, and by a lot. In many States we are over 90%. It is urban pockets where this is not the norm, due to "white flight." Those areas are destroyed already.

Why are you ignoring how that started?

GREAT find! Does this mean investigative journalism exists, at least in Portugal?

I remember when we used to have that here :(

Why? They are few. We are many. If we fight we cannot possibly lose.

Stop lying and learn how to read.

I don't remember you being such a faggot.

You can't be so retarded as to think fee fees have anything to do with it.

I've been on .win since the first day it was announced publicly.

The point of the post is a mistake the OP makes commonly. He also generates good content. Learn to tell the difference.

It's a fairly accurate paraphrase of what she might as well be saying. What a horrible person!

We need a proper dust up, put this tyranny to an end. Let Bidet meet some Neanderthals

You're far too old to be such an idiotic jerk. Aren't you supposed to shun icky?

Oh nooo, the prickle balls! Lol. This is made for the Mr Bill show

This also brings snowflake to another level

It's only a bad argument if you misuse it as you are doing. This isn't a discussion trying to overturn prohibition that I'm engaging in.

I'm not imagining any evolutionary purpose. Saying a receptor is compatible with cannabis but is not a cannabis receptor is hair splitting to a ridiculous degree. There's a reason why healing benefits from this plant are especially effective.

Excuse me but asking why is the very basis of logic and reason. Without that we accomplish nothing.

Although your response has nothing to do with my comment.

If you don't know the answers to most of this you're an idiot.

Seriously.

You can do better, and you must.

Definitely truth. The only question is how to use it, who, for what, how much, etc.

We actually have receptor sites designed for cannabis. They work to deliver all sorts of healing. Not at all how petrol based Rx interacts with receptor sites.

In the US these legal changes came about at the same time as prohibition was removed. And the Rockefeller Foundation was creating big pharma. The AMA objected, horrified that it meant all they'd have to use was petroleum based. Before that everything they used was cannabis based. They lost.

The manipulation of the profile is used to deliver very specific results.

It's not the only plant that grows like that.