Roe V. Wade set several precedents. One of these legal precedents was to uphold the right to individual bodily autonomy in medical decisions based on an interpretation that the constitutional right to privacy extended to medical decisions. (obviously "bodily autonomy" doesn't apply if you consider the fetus to be a separate life. But that was not the court's take)

Back to the main point: They cannot mandate the vaccine if you have a right to privacy and bodily autonomy in medical decisions.

And even without a federal law like Roe, blue states would still keep abortion legal.

So I suspect the federal government is willing to sacrifice Roe V. Wade if it means they can mandate the vaccine.

Thoughts?

Here is my reasoning:

Harris is very unpopular as VP.

Biden is falling apart mentally.

Midterms are coming up, as well as the halfway point of Biden presidency.

Originally many thought the plan was to prop up Biden in his seat long enough that Harris could be President for the rest of Biden's term, then have 2 terms after. But, Harris is very unpopular, even among Democrat voters. So she is unlikely to win 2 elections, or even one for that matter.

Going back to the Supreme Court- Breyer is stepping down and it has been announced that the replacement will be a black woman.

So what if they plan to put Harris on the Supreme Court, so they can replace her with a more popular VP that would finish Biden's term and win again in 2024 and 2028?

Harris spent most of her career in various legal and prosecutorial positions, so she is legally qualified to be a judge, and she is 100% Dem establishment, so she would make rulings as the Dem establishment wishes.

Her current problem is she is awful with public relations, which is a major issue for the Presidency, but a non-issue for a lifetime Supreme Court appointment.

TLDR Dems plan to kill 3 birds with one stone.

1. They get their black woman on the Court to satisfy the voters

2. said woman is 100% establishment and will make rulings as they say

3. moving her to the court allows the VP position to be filled by someone that actually stands a chance of winning an election

What are your thoughts?

https://pathwaystopeace.org/calling-22022022-the-big-shift-party/

This organization is closely affiliated with the UN and works with them in an official capacity in many ways. I'll let them explain in their own words.

It is about spreading the idea that on an agreed date, we pass ‘officially’, by ‘popular decree’, from the old world to the new world. On this date we will have a big party, a bit like a carnival, free, global, open to all : THE BIG SHIFT PARTY !

It’s about going from the Great Secret to the Great Decree. What is secretly expected by human beings must be decreed by them!

Sounds like another step in the Great Reset, but am open to other explanations.

Also want to add that something about the wording bothers me but can't put my finger on it.

We know that after World War 2, tens of thousands of Nazis escaped, taking with them experiemntal aircraft as well as conventional aircraft. We know for certain many went to South America. Speculation says they went to Antarctica and even to other, stranger places, but I will not get into that here since that's not the point of this post.

We also know that due to operation paperclip thousands of Nazi scientists were recruited into the upper echelons of the U.S. government in a variety of roles.

We know that UFOs, especially the earliest ones, bore a strking resemblance to Nazi expermental aircraft. And we know that the American government (filled with Paperclip scinetists) studied these. So the Nazs in America knew of the Nazis that escaped, and likely vice versa.

We also know that the current so-called "deep state" in America is either complicit in or actively bringing about the decline of this country.

We know that many of the issues facing our country can be traced back in one way or another to International Jewry. I have no intention of downplaying this in the least.

But if one buys into the existence of a "deep state" with a large percentage of members being Ex-Nazis or successors to ex-Nazis, it seems very strange that these people would stand by as America is destroyed with mass immigration and degeneracy in culture. Particularly since a lot of this (to put it mildly) is being pushed by the very same International Jews that the Nazis opposed so strenuously.

Therefore this brings me to two possibilities. Both of these possibilities imply that the Nazis in America were still in contact with the Nazis who escaped, but are still possible even if that is not the case.

1. The motives of the Nazis and their successors are suspect (i.e. they are controlled oppositon), For obvious reasons I have doubts about this.

2. The Nazis and their successors seek vengeance for the destruction of Europe and its institutions and culture being co-opted by their enemies, and also are angry at the slandering of themselves from the exxagerated/fake Holocaust narrative. So they are complict in, or encouraging the wrecking of this country, purely out of spite.

There is a third option, which is that the Deep State had little or no Nazis to begin with, and hence none of theie successors have power today. However I also have doubts about this because of my knowledge of Paperclip and the prominent roles its "members" ascended to.

I wrote this out in five minutes so pardon me if this comes across as retarded.

Feedback appreciated

Conspiracy Music Guru is a YouTuber who makes music videos based on various conspiracy theories. He is a self-proclaimed Flat Earth believer but even if you don't believe that (I have lots of questions) he makes videos on a variety of topics like the fake space program, 5g radiation, effects of musical frequencies on the mind, and so on.

This is one of his better videos IMO, its about NASA space program being staged.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJZ9sqvH9dY

Personally I find his songs quite entertaining/thought provoking, just curious as to whether anyone else has heard of him or what their thoughts are.

Roe V. Wade set several precedents. One of these legal precedents was to uphold the right to individual bodily autonomy in medical decisions. (obviously "bodily autonomy" doesn't apply if you consider the fetus to be a separate life. But that was not the court's take)

Back to the main point: They cannot mandate the vaccine if you have a right to bodily autonomy in medical decisions.

And even without a federal law like Roe, blue states would still keep abortion legal.

So I suspect the federal government is willing to sacrifice Roe V. Wade if it means they can mandate the vaccine.

Thoughts?

https://www.strawpoll.me/45796723

I assumed in the poll that Kamala would be the Democrat candidate because Biden is senile and she is the next in line for the Presidency. If you think any other Democrat will try to swoop in and take the nomination, I would like to hear who and why.

In the poll are listed the people who I think are most likely to seek the GOP nomination, as well as choices that include not voting at all. Voting in the poll on multiple options is allowed.

So who will run in 2024, and why? All of the candidates listed have their issues, but at present there is no viable third party candidate (to my knowledge).

In addition: will they rig the election again, or will they let a pushover/controlled op GOP politician win?

And many who have researched enough have come to the conclusion that there is no point in participating in elections and that we need the system to collapse to bring about real change. I sort of agree with this view but wanted to hear discussion from other perspectives.

Essentially, they extended the original Emergency Use Authorization, (EUA) and revised it to allow the vaccine to be used more broadly. Anyone who says it is "fully approved" is simply incorrect.

They also updated the "Fact Sheet" for doctors to include warnings for previously-documented harmful side effects like myocarditis and pericarditis.

They also spend an entire page going over "safety data" from a variety of test groups. But none of these trials fit the FDA's own standard for approving a drug, since they have only been taking place in months, and normal FDA trials take several years at the minimum.

This is probably why they didn't formally approve it, and simply extended the EUA.

I will cite the most relevant parts of the article, and link the original at the bottom for anyone that wants to read it.

On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA

In addition, the Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) was revised to provide updates on expiration dating of the authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and to update language regarding warnings and precautions related to myocarditis and pericarditis

Having concluded that the criteria for issuance of this authorization under Section 564(c) of the Act are met, I am authorizing the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19, as described in the Scope of Authorization section of this letter (Section II) and subject to the terms of this authorization. Additionally, as specified in subsection III.BB, I am authorizing use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA when used to provide a two-dose regimen for individuals aged 12 through 15 years, or Page 5 – Pfizer Inc. to provide a third dose to individuals 12 years of age or older who have undergone solid organ transplantation or who are diagnosed with conditions that are considered to have an equivalent level of immunocompromise.

They also claim as one of their justifications for extending the EUA that

C. There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19.

This appears to be misinformation, as India has already used Ivermectin to quell their surge, with very positive results. I won't go into the FDA leadership's ties to pharma companies as that is off topic for this post, but I personally think that is why they are so hell-bent on ignoring alternative treatments even after they were proven to have success in other countries.

The FDA announcement, for anyone that wants to read it for themselves: https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download

So first of all, they claim the justification for these new branch offices is to "help investigate threats against lawmakers". Which, without any elaboration on their part, can be interpreted as narrowly or broadly as they wish.

U.S. Capitol Police said because the majority of threats come from Florida and California, they decided to open two field offices: one in Tampa, and one in San Francisco.

The field officers are a first for the agency and may play a role in identifying future threats.

The spokesperson said the first field offices will be located in the Tampa and San Francisco areas, and that more locations are planned in the future.

So the federal government is using the supposed threat of terrorism, as an excuse to expand its own reach and powers.....gee where have we seen that before?

I've commented several times my view that the intent of the "defund the police" movement is to secure support for "police reform" that would allow for a federal law enforcement agency. But, this new justification is a lot simpler and makes even more sense.

They've already gone overboard with trying to make the Capitol Riot out to be the worst thing since 9/11 and Pearl Harbor. They keep calling it 1/6, they have journalists and politicians crying about the impact and trauma, and the rioters themselves have been treated as domestic terrorists and imprisoned for months without bail or counsel.

So of course they would use the Capitol Riot as a justification to expand the reach of law enforcement, just as they did with the Patriot Act after 9/11, and with the various surveillance laws passed after Pearl Harbor.

Here's some links for anyone that wants to do some reading

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/january-6-capitol-riot-capitol-police-field-offices-florida-california/

https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/u-s-capitol-police-to-open-up-new-branch-office-in-san-francisco/

https://www.fox13news.com/news/hillsborough-gop-calls-on-gov-desantis-to-keep-us-capitol-police-from-opening-tampa-field-office