1
Allas8 1 point ago +2 / -1

That is an issue of perspective, as the horizon rises to eye level. Cameras have a focal length, which limits how far they can see across our flat earth.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +2 / -1

As the sun travels away from us, the angel from us to the sun gets smaller and smaller. As the angel from us to the sun gets smaller, frequency from sunlight reaching us also gets smaller. As the frequency gets small enough, the sunlight that reaches us will be ultraviolet, which we can not see with our eyes.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you tried googling a triangle calculator? If you really want to know, I am sure you can figure it out.

3
Allas8 3 points ago +3 / -0

I tried looking into this.

The live video system is still very experimental

https://overlookhorizon.com/flight-19/

Apparently flat earthers have to develop balloon satellites.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

My claim is that the distance from Sydney and Santiago to the North Pole is correct on the Azimuthal equidistant map projection: thus the most accurate map of the world we have.

0
Allas8 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because I do not have to.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

From Sydney to the North Pole it is 8,558 miles. From Santiago to the North Pole it is 8,527 miles. If you get yourself a ruler out, you can see that the distance from both of these two places to the North Pole is just about the same on this map.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, it is a lot more accurate than the Mercator projection, which shows Greenland as the size of Africa. If there is any map of the world we should be teaching children in school, it is the Azimuthal equidistant projection, as it shows the distance to the North Pole accurately, no matter where in the world you are; also Australia is shown on top, which I think they prefer.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, hollow earth is connected to giant earth, where the globe people are not able to explain a lack of curvature per their model: instead of there being 8 inches of curvature per square miles, if the earth was 10 times bigger, there be 0.8 inches of curvature per square miles, a lot harder to detect.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

He might be a hopeless case, but as long as he find some minor detail to complain about, I do not mind. Interaction is generally good, and brings people to FE, and just about nothing creates more activity than FE on here. They tried ignoring FE, but that did not work. Then they tried mocking FE, and that definitely did not work. So here we are.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is what I wrote. In the future I will try and word this better. Molecules transfer heat when they vibrate, or something like that.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Molecules create energy when they vibrate, yes. I guess I could have said that molecules create heat when they vibrate. I would say that heat is a form of energy though. Anyway, thanks for correcting me, I will try and use the right words.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Molecules do not create energy from nothing. They receive energy, then that energy is transferred to heat, in the form of vibration of the molecules. A turbine also creates energy, but it does not create energy from nothing, it creates the energy from the force that pushes the turbine around.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

If someone deposits money into the bank, the bank is going to loan that money out to someone else. That is generally how banks work.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Molecules receive energy, then vibrates, which we measure as temperature.

If you can not be respectful, I will not respond.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

All molecules have energy and are in constant motion, they vibrate. This vibration is the energy of the matter and can be measured as temperature. Most matter expands when heated, and when cooled it contracts. The more energy something has, the higher its temperature and the more its molecules are vibrating.

https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=molecules+energy&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

0
Allas8 0 points ago +1 / -1

The sun is moving, which is the source of sunlight. During a sunset, you can watch the sky go from blue to purple, then to black as no more visible light is reaching us, as the angular diameter from us to the sun is to small, and only ultraviolet light is able to reach us. The smaller the angular diameter is between us and the sun, the lower the frequency of light reaching us will be.

3
Allas8 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, that is correct. Sun moving faster in the winter (December), can be measured by wind speed, jet streams, and trade wind.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because I talk about molecules. Water is millions of millions of H2O molecules combined together. A single H2O molecule creates less heat than a O2 molecules when it vibrates, as the individual O2 molecule is heavier than a H2O molecule.

I can use Helium as an example instead. Helium is lighter then Oxygen, so Helium will rise and find its bouncy level higher up in the air then Oxygen will. Since Helium weigh less then Oxygen does, when a Helium atom vibrates, it creates less energy then an Oxygen atom does, when the Oxygen atom vibrates. So as we rise in altitude, and you find less and less Oxygen atoms in the air, and more Helium atoms, it gets colder, as Helium creates less energy when exposed to sunlight then Oxygen does.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +2 / -1

The wavelength that reaches us can become so small that it no longer is in the visible spectrum of light.

3
Allas8 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because the sun is further away from you at night, then it is at day (assuming you are not at the North Pole).

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

As the sunlight interact with a molecule, it makes it vibrate. Close to the ground is the heavy molecules, like O2, which when they vibrate create energy. At about 10,000 meters, you will find lighter molecules, like H2O, which when interacting with sunlight, they also vibrates, creating energy. The O2 molecule will create more energy when it vibrates than the H2O molecule, as it is heavier. The more energy is created, we perceive as heat.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because the sun moves in a circle. If you stand on the North Pole, which is the most northern point on earth, and the center of the circle the sun makes, you would not experience a night or day cycle during a 24 hour period. But as you move south, there is a distance between you and the center of the path the sun makes, which means that that the distance between you and the sun changes throughout the day.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +3 / -2

Consider Buoyancy and density. Hydrogen is the lightest element. At the highest point in heaven, you are going to find pure Hydrogen. The higher you go, the colder it gets, as the molecule binding gets lighter and lighter, creating less and less energy as they vibrates. As it gets colder, at some point gas is going to turn liquid, like the clouds bringing us rain, and even freeze. High up in the atmosphere you are going to find Magnesium mixed with hydrogen and other light elements. As this Magnesium mixture gets cold enough, it is going to turn solid, and start falling back to the earth. If a big enough chunk of Magnesium freezes high enough up in the atmosphere, it can create this light show, that you call Meteorites.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›