This is censorship on steroids. I'm not attacking the person. I would like to argue the point, but how can I do that when I have no clue what the argument is. It has nothing to do with my post, at least I don't think so.
How did I break rule #1 and he didn't? when he said "I've always found that the lowest consciousness NPCs". Or maybe you removed his comment as well, meantime?
I don't really care about removing comments which are inappropriate. But, if you have to be consistent, otherwise credibility is lost.
You're right, I should have pruned better, fixed now, on both ends. Your infant remark was what I first removed and commented on. I appreciate both of yours help going forward.
Edit: my apologies for my poor time management issues this last little while.
This is censorship on steroids. I'm not attacking the person. I would like to argue the point, but how can I do that when I have no clue what the argument is. It has nothing to do with my post, at least I don't think so.
Don't mind what was between me and him. Your comment was removed for attacking the user not the argument, maybe reread what I removed?
How did I break rule #1 and he didn't? when he said "I've always found that the lowest consciousness NPCs". Or maybe you removed his comment as well, meantime?
I don't really care about removing comments which are inappropriate. But, if you have to be consistent, otherwise credibility is lost.
You're right, I should have pruned better, fixed now, on both ends. Your infant remark was what I first removed and commented on. I appreciate both of yours help going forward. Edit: my apologies for my poor time management issues this last little while.