So, AI systems engage in self-directed learning, refining their performance without the need for external supervision. Since humans are not involved in this process, who or what is? archons? daemons, non-human entities from a different dimension?
That's also precisely what Yuval Noah Harari, WEF and UN spokesman, suggests, AI should be seen as "Alien Intelligence" because its decision-making processes are fundamentally different from human thinking, despite being originally designed by humans. During an interview Harari said it all "The idea of a Soul, Free Will -- these are Over!".
a) Believing in "I" + "YOU" neutralizes "ONE". Neuter (neither of two) implies singularity. Life being moved from inception towards death cannot hold onto either side without neutralizing self.
b) Coincidence aka co (together) incidere (to fall). The rise of being implies falling (inception towards death) apart (life) from one another. Choosing to hold onto a side (i or you; do or don't; belief or disbelief) inverts apartheid into coincidence.
Writing: "I don't believe" coincides with "You do disbelieve"...either of which neutralizes the state of being if held onto.
Sys (together) stem (to stand)...it's the users of AI who stand together while engaging (binding) themselves. Few adapt to nature while tricking many to bind themselves to artifice.
refining
AI regurgitates artifice which contaminates users. Refinement implies being within nature resisting the temptation of artifice.
without the need for external supervision
Being implies within nature. AI tempts being into mental confinement aka ignoring nature, while permitting artifice to supervise ignorance.
Since humans are not involved in this process, who or what is?
Nature implies process; being implies potential. AI tempts potential to take possession of artifice, while ignoring natural procession.
Questioning who or what implies ones lack of self discernment which another cannot give one. AI is being used to give artificial answers to ignorant questions as to maintain the lack of self discernment among users.
Ignoring self discernment implies self abuse...few trick many into a circle of use/abuse. Every user represents an abuser of self.
a) Recursive (returning) implies circular response...living implies linear response.
b) Autonomous (self law) aka self/sel/sol (soul; sole) aka natural law representing to sole soul self for each being within. It's choosing to hold onto anything which establishes dependency during autonomy.
c) Teach (to give instruction) implies giving structure (life) within action (inception towards death). Learn/lois/læst (sole of the foot) implies walking (life) within sole (inception towards death).
To teach self implies to learn self and vice versa. That's autonomy...student under teacher implies dependency. What's the Hebrew word for instruction? Talmud!
Few utilize AI to maintain the circle of dependency, which distracts many from natural autonomy.
Edit: recursive autonomous learning
So, AI systems engage in self-directed learning, refining their performance without the need for external supervision. Since humans are not involved in this process, who or what is? archons? daemons, non-human entities from a different dimension?
That, my dear Watson, is precisely the question.. 🔎👣
That's also precisely what Yuval Noah Harari, WEF and UN spokesman, suggests, AI should be seen as "Alien Intelligence" because its decision-making processes are fundamentally different from human thinking, despite being originally designed by humans. During an interview Harari said it all "The idea of a Soul, Free Will -- these are Over!".
I've seen a few others relate it to 'alien intelligence' too, me, I don't believe in neutrality or coincidence.
a) Believing in "I" + "YOU" neutralizes "ONE". Neuter (neither of two) implies singularity. Life being moved from inception towards death cannot hold onto either side without neutralizing self.
b) Coincidence aka co (together) incidere (to fall). The rise of being implies falling (inception towards death) apart (life) from one another. Choosing to hold onto a side (i or you; do or don't; belief or disbelief) inverts apartheid into coincidence.
Writing: "I don't believe" coincides with "You do disbelieve"...either of which neutralizes the state of being if held onto.
Sys (together) stem (to stand)...it's the users of AI who stand together while engaging (binding) themselves. Few adapt to nature while tricking many to bind themselves to artifice.
AI regurgitates artifice which contaminates users. Refinement implies being within nature resisting the temptation of artifice.
Being implies within nature. AI tempts being into mental confinement aka ignoring nature, while permitting artifice to supervise ignorance.
Nature implies process; being implies potential. AI tempts potential to take possession of artifice, while ignoring natural procession.
Questioning who or what implies ones lack of self discernment which another cannot give one. AI is being used to give artificial answers to ignorant questions as to maintain the lack of self discernment among users.
Ignoring self discernment implies self abuse...few trick many into a circle of use/abuse. Every user represents an abuser of self.
a) Recursive (returning) implies circular response...living implies linear response.
b) Autonomous (self law) aka self/sel/sol (soul; sole) aka natural law representing to sole soul self for each being within. It's choosing to hold onto anything which establishes dependency during autonomy.
c) Teach (to give instruction) implies giving structure (life) within action (inception towards death). Learn/lois/læst (sole of the foot) implies walking (life) within sole (inception towards death).
To teach self implies to learn self and vice versa. That's autonomy...student under teacher implies dependency. What's the Hebrew word for instruction? Talmud!
Few utilize AI to maintain the circle of dependency, which distracts many from natural autonomy.