Hello newcomer who is asking the same questions as accounts banned as probable sockpuppets. The answer is that it's not contradictory for a post to stay active beyond when it says it will stay active for. Plus the OP has now changed and states the reason straightforwardly so that even a newcomer can understand it.

You seem to imply there is some injustice going on. As I've said, the fact that a vote is sparsely attended should be taken as indicating it's not a strong consensus, rather than that legalistic rules should be imposed by newcomers upon moderators entrusted by the community whom the community has found no consensus fault in.