Throughout history, the countries with the smartest people has shifted from one ethnic group to another. Egyptian, Persian, greek, roman and chinese empires were all the most powerful empires in the world over the past 2000 years. They were mostly of different ethnicities and weren't white. Also the romans being white is just complete nonsense, the ancient roman historians described the romans having Mediterranean features in comparison to germans having western european features in contrast.
My point is that what determines the smartest ethnic groups are just circumstantial luck which allows the populace to take over neighboring countries, trade routes, and to acquire knowledge and advancements. Whites aren't just better than everybody else, contrary to what white supremacists would want you to believe.
See, it's the subhumanizing you're doing that is getting your comments removed. This one too, now
I guess. I prefer to say what i see plainly and get removed rather than being fake.
The person you are attacking is not subhuman, I know subhumanity and it is an extreme offense that ought to be used carefully.
This is an interesting point you raise. Being a 5’3, dark-skinned Indian with slight asd/adhd in the west has often made me feel subhuman compared to those around me.
The thing is, I’m also considered smart, attractive, and from a rich family with lots of connections. Im simply a walking contradiction and it makes me wonder why God would give me such a mixed bag of traits that are polar opposites. Why would God give me so many strengths that don’t mean anything because my weaknesses completely cancel them out.
Simply put, unless you can convince me otherwise. I am fine being called subhuman and understand why someone would call me that. Accepting it and working on what I’m good at is what I think is best for me.
He's literally generalizing a whole population through a smear definition without even caring to offer a rationale for what he means through that so he can keep doing that. But what do i know, ikr.