This is where you look not so discerning. You're running away despite saying you intended to be transparent. I linked a Scored image link that proved your argument was fallacious, and you pretend it doesn't exist.
How benevolent of you...
Me:
I didn't even check where it was from that is how little I care.
Apparently you don't understand the duck test. On the internet, if it quacks like a duck it can be treated like a duck. If a handshake evinces knowledge of community tropes in username and first comment, it's clear it's somebody regular who is abusing an alt. If not actually an alt, he could complain via modmail and be apprised of the situation and perhaps even be given a provisional credit of some kind. But judgment about platform manipulation does take situational factors into account. The fact of several repetitions of the same behavior kinda confirms the first judgment.
Y'know, maybe I shouldn't feed a disruptor, but I wrote it so there it is.
You've both violated site ToS.
Constantly creating new usernames just to pester moderation and you could stop insulting my intelligence but ya know, free will.
Dresden is on his first double for lashing out and breaking the rules, I would prefer you didn't do the same but ya know, free will.
You have no access to the IP logs of this site so that's a baseless accusation.
Since you're helding everyone to higher standards so everyone should do the same to you. Eye for an eye.
New short thread:
JG5:
How benevolent of you...
Me:
I didn't even check where it was from that is how little I care.
I have no desire to have to check your links to see if they are safe and then see what you're talking about, so they will go unanswered by me.
Apparently you don't understand the duck test. On the internet, if it quacks like a duck it can be treated like a duck. If a handshake evinces knowledge of community tropes in username and first comment, it's clear it's somebody regular who is abusing an alt. If not actually an alt, he could complain via modmail and be apprised of the situation and perhaps even be given a provisional credit of some kind. But judgment about platform manipulation does take situational factors into account. The fact of several repetitions of the same behavior kinda confirms the first judgment.
Y'know, maybe I shouldn't feed a disruptor, but I wrote it so there it is.
If it walks like a duck. If it quacks like a duck. It's a satanist.