No. The translation of his username is Thus Always Tyrants. I've changed it to Thus Always Pederasts which is a specific kind of pedo and it is a correct statement.
Check out c/deviance for copious amounts of evidence.
I agree with you. When do you see me resorting to such tactics when talking to reasonable people? Spoiler alert: never. Now let's sing kumbaya and wish for peace on Earth.
Yeah when he talks to non White people or straight race traitors. The other reasonable guy is a satanist who larps as a Christian. Nice try trying to paint me as unreasonable. I've said to you a number of times, but costs nothing to repeat it once again: these tricks don't work on me.
I didn't say you aren't reasonable and I apologize my words were understood that way, I've always known you are reasonable, which is why we stay talking so well.
New thread:
Me: So what I'm hearing is we should (be) better than resorting to those low intelligence tactics, right?
RWR: Don't so-what-you-are-saying me. The problem isn't speech.it's trolling every single time we notice.
Also, please start another thread as this one literally reached rock bottom.
Me: I was summarizing to see if I understood what you are saying correctly, not sure why I shouldn't do that.
Noticing is fine, ad hominem is unnecessary.
Which word you didn't like?
You're calling the user a pedo not offending his argument, hence rule 1
No. The translation of his username is Thus Always Tyrants. I've changed it to Thus Always Pederasts which is a specific kind of pedo and it is a correct statement.
Check out c/deviance for copious amounts of evidence.
We have no evidence this user is a pedo and it's breaking rule 1.
You're right I need to be better. Thanks for your help.
I agree with you. When do you see me resorting to such tactics when talking to reasonable people? Spoiler alert: never. Now let's sing kumbaya and wish for peace on Earth.
Edit: fixing autojeetizer spells saar
Rules are for talking to unreasonable people too but there is actual public proof that the user you are talking to in this thread is reasonable.
Yeah when he talks to non White people or straight race traitors. The other reasonable guy is a satanist who larps as a Christian. Nice try trying to paint me as unreasonable. I've said to you a number of times, but costs nothing to repeat it once again: these tricks don't work on me.
I didn't say you aren't reasonable and I apologize my words were understood that way, I've always known you are reasonable, which is why we stay talking so well.