Be more open to discussion. Write a post with the rules and all the criteria used to apply them. Then let people give their input. Setting a reply limit of three or four paragraphs would be prudent to exclude spammers looking to derail the discussion.
Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
Maybe you should put up a post so people can discuss these changes.
These aren't so much changes as they are going back to the basics of this forum's moderation style. It may seem shocking because it's been awhile.
Meybe you forgot. But here's a suggestion I've made months ago.
https://scored.co/c/CommunitiesConflict/p/19Bsxo2WOt/
I'm sure most sane people here will appreciate a discussion on the matter which will only improve your standing with this community.
Conspiracies become so due to lack of transparency after all.
I haven't forgotten. I appreciate transparency and am not sure how I am being opaque.
Be more open to discussion. Write a post with the rules and all the criteria used to apply them. Then let people give their input. Setting a reply limit of three or four paragraphs would be prudent to exclude spammers looking to derail the discussion.
The reports and conversations. I lurk well.
So let's create a post and show our cards. Otherwise c/conspiracies will become c/MetaConspiracies.
I'm not publicizing reports.
I don't see how this will become metaconspiracies now, perhaps I don't understand what you mean?
Even though you're not publicizing reports everything is public anyway.
Due to apparent lack of transparency conspiracies will become a conspiracy itself this becoming a meta conspiracies.