Is this true?
(twitter.com)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
She's happy because thousands of people turned out to support Charlie. is she supposed to be sobbing while thanking people for supporting him? Diligent Denizen is fucking retarded.
Florence Nightingale was right about women.
"Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream out at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving any in return, for they cannot state a fact accurately to another, nor can that other woman attend to it accurately enough for it to become information. Now is not all this the result of want of sympathy?
"I am sick with indignation at what wives and mothers will do of the most shocking selfishness. And people call it all maternal or conjugal affection, and think it pretty to say so. No, no, let each person tell the truth from their own experience.
"They really don’t have sympathy or the ability to empathize, because they are always judging everyone and every thing as a product on a social value scale that relates to their own egos and bounces off of themselves. There is no capability for genuine feeling.
"This is what I have experienced with women, there is no capability for genuine feeling for other humans, or really in general, except when those feelings are for themselves and the other people are just proxies to bounce ideas off of."
You stole this take from me.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARwig7eyW/x/c/4eZDCM4O0jB?d=2
What's weird is that there's no way you should have seen it.
Wrong, I stole it from a /pol/ thread years ago.
Of course you did. It's just a coincidence that I said it five days ago.
Get your own ideas, you clown.
Five whole days, huh? I was posting it here four months ago.
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1AR0eFkkhG/-----/c/4eWcifJQMhn?d=50
https://communities.win/c/Funny/p/1AR0iyizWY/its-time-we-have-a-conversation-/c/4eWd2AkEfcn?d=50
And look, one time was in reply to your alt. What shameless chutzpah, stealing my line and then accusing me of stealing it from you.
Candace's purpose is to poison the well of actual discussion on the fake assassination.
Nice projection.
Fake? So Kirk is alive?
Kirk was a court jester who spilled wine all over his motley like the fool he was.
Jingle jangle goes the fool.
Why do people care whenever some political cultist dies anyway?
They either cry like crocodiles or celebrate like retards.
Personally, i do neither, for the same reason I doth not cry nor celebrate when washing bacteria off my talons with soap.
Of course an atheist would be glad that the logical threat (Kirk) to his belief set's grip on his mind is dead. No surprise there. The rifle wielder is glad when the opposing tank gets destroyed.
Kirk was never a good debater, he was a Christian Ben Shapiro who dunked on college kids and cut out the times he lost.
He was. You haven't watched his stuff then.
Why do you imply he is bad?
Do you have any evidence of this?
"He never lost so I have to cope by saying he cut them out!!!1! angry.jpg"
I have. He picks people with stupid logic to make himself look smarter. Just like Shapiro. Both of them would be dumpstered by someone actually prepared to debate.
Because he's just another Kirk. Marriage shill with a big mouth, who isn't as smart as he thinks he is.
There are people who claim to have won debates against Kirk and never got included in the footage. I'm inclined to believe it because nobody ever challenged him well in his videos.