Which is right? Use all arguments that you know of!
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
So is being single free? No, because it costs humanity a would-be new kid.
That's the most retarded, entitled take I've ever heard.
A child is not just a number on a chart, natalist.
Is or is not being single "free"?
Who? To what?
Didn't say they were. In fact, children are gifts! And precious in the sight of God!
It is free. Nobody is losing anything tangible from people who don't want children not having them. That's a good thing, you don't want to make people parents who don't want to be.
You feel entitled to make other people's life decisions for them. There's no greater embodiment of freedom than the ability to not have children, hence the young people's revolution against natalism in Romania in 1989.
You certainly treat it like it is just about numbers. Kids born to parents who didn't want them don't turn out well. We know this. It's how society ended up with Josephine's idol.