It wasn't. The idea of using transgender ideology as a weapon came from Valerie Solanas' manifesto in the 60s.
Me, because we don't need another Manson.
You could argue women win through the promotion of marrying for muh birth rate. But right now I'm not having a gender debate.
But I do, that's why they are all turning against Trump now. Because he sold them out to cultists like Muskrat.
It's about denying the free market, denying men's ability to ignore marriage and having kids until the contract is fair. Everything else is just whining. The only way to "stop white genocide" is to force the unwilling to have kids.
It's not a slippery slope. They genuinely do not deserve rights and their existence is to the detriment of everyone in society.
They don't represent white people and never have. They wish they did.
"muh white genocide" is about controlling people.
Mhm, like how baking the cake for deviants wasn't a slippery slope. Oh wait....
Says who? And why?
So it's not women? Simply the MEN who contradict your beliefs are the baddies.
THANKS FOR ADMITTING YOU ARE ANTI-MALE IF THE MALES OPPOSE YOU, EVEN MORE SO THAN WOMEN.
By that logic you don't represent single men.
About controlling Whites, yeah.
It wasn't. The idea of using transgender ideology as a weapon came from Valerie Solanas' manifesto in the 60s.
Me, because we don't need another Manson.
You could argue women win through the promotion of marrying for muh birth rate. But right now I'm not having a gender debate.
But I do, that's why they are all turning against Trump now. Because he sold them out to cultists like Muskrat.
It's about denying the free market, denying men's ability to ignore marriage and having kids until the contract is fair. Everything else is just whining. The only way to "stop white genocide" is to force the unwilling to have kids.