Had this as a link post but it was saying, "Watch video on YouTube, Error 153, Video player configuration error". Deleted it and doing a text discussion instead.
Trying to clear out some of the bookmarks bar. Resuming this one from the other week.
"CALLING EARTH (Afterlife communication via modern electronics)"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwNNdutCP00
I'm up to 40 minutes and they were talking about EVP, then ITC. Now they're getting into voice phone calls.
Earlier this evening was looking into some of this. Never really heard about ITC. You'd hear about EVP's though. But they're pretty bad. It seems like it's hard for them to get through for very long. They're not "talking". They use things like white noise or something to form sound transmission.
I was talking to Gemini about this but deleted the conersation. About like, what's going on here, where they have a narrow window and most EVP's are only like less than a few seconds. Seems like it's hard for them to get energy to transmit.
Then this ITC, they mentioned a site.. but it was down. Wayback, you could see some of these images. They looked like double exposure. Let me check my browser history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_voice_phenomenon
In there they talk about ITC.
This was an interesting one, where a lady on a computer before the internet.. all of a sudden had a screen with text.
https://macyafterlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/arthurbeckwithletter.jpg
They looked into what this guy was trying to transmit and these people from the 1800's checked out. What's up with the mis-spellings though and wrong caps. You'd think it would figure that out. Like his name, he did the inverse with lower case start letters and caps rest.
ok this was that site.. worlditc.org but the guy probably died, so doesn't connect any more.
Oh wait, maybe it's not down.. it's that it's not using https, but http
"This site can’t provide a secure connection worlditc.org uses an unsupported protocol. ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH"
Checking the wayback and still loads up from this year, so maybe who runs it isn't dead. It's like a 2000's html type pages.
https://web.archive.org/web/20250124133305/https://worlditc.org/
Let's get the visual images where they seem like the faces are double exposure, for whatever reason.
See.. this is old html.. bottom says "rodiehr Dec 17, 2002 - updated Dec 18, 2007"
This stuff is interesting though, man.
It's not good though.. cause just for EVP's, they're saying, oh you gotta try to talk to them. Then I'm there.. hey have they tried using Ouija boards to get things going. That's like how you talk to them too, verbally as you're trying to do this. You're attracting negative entities.. and they could be lying about who they claim. Same shit with this. You don't want to try to open communication with the other side by asking them stuff and inviting them in. You'll lose and get negative entity attachment. Yet they're trying to make it look like, oh it's my "loved one" who's trying to say hey. I don't think so.. this 'll totally be "demonic entities" who are "lying". So.. it's probably the same thing with the ITC, visual aspect, where they're faking that too, I bet.
What exactly is going on here, how the EVP's "close window", very shortly after they transmit. What is going on with the earth field, or something, where they can't keep holding it for very long.
[part 2]
What kind of prices are we looking at here, to buy this equipment?
VLF (Very Low Frequency) Receiving Converter: Raudive told Macy to get a VLF converter [45:42]. VLF waves are much longer than standard radio waves and are often used for things like submarine communication because they can penetrate deeply through obstacles.
HF (High Frequency) Radio: Macy was instructed to connect the VLF converter to the antenna input of his High Frequency radio [45:50].
VLF Antenna: He also specified that a "suitable VLF antenna" was required for the setup to work correctly [45:56].
Building a station like the one Constantine Raudive described is actually much more affordable today than it was in the early 90s, thanks to the rise of Software Defined Radio (SDR).
Here is a breakdown of the equipment costs based on current market prices. You can go the "vintage/hardware" route (which mimics Macy’s actual setup) or the modern "SDR" route (which is cheaper and more powerful).
DIY Kit: $12 – $20. Companies like Jackson Harbor Press sell small kits. You’ll need a soldering iron.
Assembled Units: $45 – $140. You can find "Ham It Up" converters or vintage Palomar VLF converters on eBay.
Modern SDR (Alternative): $30 – $150. If you buy an SDR (like an RTL-SDR Blog V3), it often has a "Direct Sampling" mode that lets you listen to VLF without needing a separate converter at all.
Portable Shortwave Radio: $50 – $150. Look for models like the Tecsun PL-660 or PL-880. They are sensitive enough to pick up the signal from your converter.
Desktop Ham Radio (The "Pro" Way): $600 – $1,200+. Brands like Icom or Yaesu are what the serious researchers use. These are much more stable and "clear as a bell," as Macy described.
Computer SDR (The Modern Way): $30. Plugging a USB stick into your PC lets your computer screen act as the radio tuner.
Mini-Whip / Active Antenna: $15 – $40. These are small (about the size of a pill bottle) and very popular for VLF research.
Wire Loop: $5 – $20. Literally just a long spool of copper wire wrapped around a frame. This is likely what a DIY researcher would have used in the 90s.
Stormwise VLF Antennas: $180 – $250. High-end, pre-tuned antennas used for lightning detection and specialized VLF work.
Total Estimated Cost, Setup Type,Estimated Cost, Pros/Cons,
The "Budget" Route~$70 - $100 Uses a cheap SDR and a DIY antenna. Great for starting out.
The "Macy Replica"~$250 - $400 Uses a physical shortwave radio, a dedicated converter, and a loop antenna.
The "Pro Station"$1,000+ High-end Ham Radio and amplified VLF probes. Maximum clarity.
A Warning from the Research: If you do decide to set this up, remember your own point about "inviting things in." ITC researchers often suggest that the equipment is only 50% of the circuit—the other 50% is the "medium" or the operator's own intent. If you're worried about negative entities, many suggest strictly using these for "listening only" rather than attempting to call out.
Would you like me to look for the specific wiring diagrams or "blueprints" that these researchers published for setting up a VLF-to-HF bridge?
=============================
See.. this is what I was thinking as I got to the end part.. see.. it even mentioned it. You fuck around with this shit, you'd get negative entity attachment. lol. No thanks. lol