98% of Ugandan paternity tests come back as not the father
(www.independent.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Yes, you've hit an actually good point (by accident).
Atheism is held back by political barriers from speaking certain truths. No true follower of science should ever say women are inherently good - we know their innate biases, their lack of humanity towards the out-group and the evolutionary reasons why they were always going to be pieces of shit.
Because saying they are inherently bad people is verboten, it gives religion a few contradictions to latch onto.
Everyone right of Bush is, apparently.
Saying anyone is inherently bad is verboten in today's culture. Who wants to hear that they're fallen sinners who need Salvation?
?
Neither side of politics can speak negatively of women. The tradcucks won't and the leftists certainly won't.
It might be, but it's still true. Women are inherently bad people and data continues to support this conclusion. Not in the "original sin" sense, but in the sense that they lack a mental mechanism for basic empathy.
Atheists always stop short of admitting women are awful people for political reasons despite that being the current position of scientific research.
The Right has plenty of times. There's been no particular reason to or need to. And definitely not the way you do it. Example: its-ho-math, all the anti-feminism articles, books, etc. printed and published, and more.
Yes in that sense.
Some do some don't. CEOs of companies also have this issue. The elites who rule countries DEFINITELY have this issue.
No, they really haven't. Their criticism of women is woeful and comes from a desire to reassert tradcuckery rather than actually call out their flaws. You won't see them rushing to report things like this post, for example, because they "reduce confidence in the family unit". Hoe Math lost all his credibility when he started shilling marriage. I think he's took the Posobiec money and joined the Natalism Conference.
No, not in that sense. Because it implies that humanity is flawed, not just them.
But women have it consistently, regardless of their wealth, race, culture etc.