Hitler in 1922:
"The Jews have shown real genius in profiting by politics. This capitalistic people, which was brought into existence by the unscrupulous exploitation of men, has understood how to get the leadership of the Fourth Estate into its own hands; and by acting both on the Right and on the Left it has its apostles in both camps. On the Right the Jew does his best to encourage all the evils there are to such an extent that the man of the people, poor devil, will be exasperated as much as possible— greed of money, unscrupulousness, hard- heartedness, abominable snobbishness. More and more Jews have wormed their way into our upper-class families; and the consequence has been that the ruling class has been alienated from its own people."
Hitler was a socialist (NOT a Marxist) and he despised capitalism. He despised the Jews and their wealth. When Joseph was in Egypt, what did he do? He exploited the poor, taking everything from them. This Jew became extremely rich but was merciless to the Egyptians. He enslaved the native Egyptians. And the Jew understood: exploitation is easiest in times of hardship and war! But when his Jewish family came to Egypt from Canaan, he wasn't harsh on them at all. He gave them sacks full of food and gold! That's how Jews are... they come to foreign countries and exploit them, become masters, and support each other against the Gentiles. Wake up!
I ask you: What would you have done? If the Jews came to your country and took everything from you and made you a slave, would you have started hating the Jews like the Egyptians did, turned the tables, and enslaved the Jews?
a) What if a jew suggests public affairs (politic) to tempt gentiles to take part in it willingly aka shirking response-ability onto representative government?
b) What if everything perceivable cannot be taken...only denied by ones perception when taking suggestions by another? What if denial aka nihilo (nothing) implies the inversion of everything?
Why was Joseph so merciless towards the Egyptians in their own land? How dare he, a foreigner, treat the locals this way? And how dare he treat his own brothers better by giving them free food and gold? This is Jewish capitalism.
Pretty sure Joseph was the helper that prevented the Egyptians from starving.. You have your facts twisted, again.
What if public affairs (politics) distract one from private (life) affair (inception towards death) aka being set apart within that one has to do?
What if profit implies "set forward"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/profit and only loss (inception towards death) can set forth profit (life)?
Capital implies capit (head) al (all) aka each ones head (perception) within all (perceivable)...what if consenting to suggestions by another permits the suggested into ones head?
Exploit implies "outcome of action"...being implies reaction (life) coming in (inception) and out (death) of action.
Why should one doubt (scruple) those who seek death over life?
By suggesting vessels to follow willingly.
A chosen one reacts to an enacting left/right balance...those who choose representative government bind themselves into a left vs right imbalance.
Within nature...left and right cannot turn against one another, yet each being within has the free will of choice to ignore natural for artificial, which shapes make-believe conflicts.
What if a jew offers gentiles money for free by simply suggesting artificial prices upon natural value? What if taking money by free will of choice becomes exponentially more expensive for oneself to hold onto...since all natural value moves?
What is more greedy? Offering currency in exchange for interest or taking currency including interest upon self?
What if being implies solid (life) struggling to sustain self within fluid (inception towards death)?
What if temptation softens even the hardest resistance?
a) What if nature separating each being from one another implies alienation? What if ignoring nature by artificially coming together implies an alien invasion?
What if each jew defense itself from an alien invasion by gentiles?
b) What if ignoring person (singular) for people (plural) permits each jew to own gentiles collectively?
Poor or rich implies a measurement aka ones mind TAKING measure, while ignoring all GIVEN. A jew simply exploits gentiles by taking advantage over whoever ignores given.