The footage. And you, clearly, have the same Britarded sentiment as the guy you claim not to be, claiming that the mere presence of a knife justifies strangling little girls.
You're the same kind of sick pervert as the mud slime.
You neutralize the threat.
She did. She fended off the subhuman advancing on her and her sister. Pity she didn't do it in the permanent sense. Every less mohammadan(or atheist) makes the sun shine just a little bit brighter.
The footage. And you, clearly, have the same Britarded sentiment as the guy you claim not to be, claiming that the mere presence of a knife justifies strangling little girls.
You're the same kind of sick pervert as the mud slime.
She did. She fended off the subhuman advancing on her and her sister. Pity she didn't do it in the permanent sense. Every less mohammadan(or atheist) makes the sun shine just a little bit brighter.
So, you have nothing. As expected.
You have no basis to claim the man is guilty. Just another #BelieveWomen type?
And the fact that there have been multiple killings of innocent men by young girls that year is irrelevant?
Your entire problem is that I do.
What evidence do you have of an "attack" other than her word?
Women's word is worth nothing to any sane person.
Atheists and trying to play internet courtroom. Name a more iconic combination.
Attacking little girls is not "existing".
Although if your argument is that arabs literally exist to rape, I'd agree. The average arab male has committed 2.6 rapes before the age of 30.