He was a man with daddy issues who took women's side on everything and thought sex for anything other than procreation was evil.
Was he even born with a penis or was he the true predecessor to David Reimer?
He was a natalist with no kids, it's fucking hilarious when you think about it. Not even he himself, despite pouring his entire political legacy into it, wanted to have children.
I guess the modern equivalent of that is perennially absent father Musk, friend of Epstein, whining about birth rates.
thought sex for anything other than procreation was evil
I understand you are $omehow motivated to keep tying everything directly to ending reproduction among the class of contributors here without providing any ideas for how the human race should be reproducing, but this statement goes against 99% of reporting on Hitler's sex life.
He had no kids because he personally acted like sexual stimulation was in fact for everything other than procreation.
The fact that he preached large families to the Catholic populace doesn't speak about his own behavior.
Anti-natalists don't need to be paid, our ideology is self-evident. The idea of "providing an alternative" is asinine, we simply advise that a group of child rapists are trying to influence society using taxpayer money to push terrible contracts on you.
Would someone need to "provide an alternative" when calling out any other kind of fraud? Does he need to offer alternative investments if he tells you AppLovin is the next stock to crash 90%?
Yes, he was a massive hypocrite, I'm well aware. He would preach how meaningless sex was Jewish corruption and then proceed to do exactly that.
Yes, you need to provide an alternative when your theory is basically don't have kids. The only thing I've heard is that having kids will happen naturally anyway, which is true, which makes it crazy to say you're against people speaking well of having kids when you know there's no other way to retain a human race.
It's self-evident that all human society has spoken well of having kids for this reason and not because of some plot. It's more likely that the plot is not to have kids and there are massive evidences that such a plot exists.
Society has never conferred special financial benefits to parents except in autocratic states. The entire idea of birth incentives came from the fucking Soviet Union.
I don't have much to add to what JosephMalta said, but I might as well add this.
The entire foundation of Nazism was a retarded natalist set of beliefs. Right down to handing medals to women for having kids - it was all about creating an environment for women to be worshipped for their wombs.
Ironically, Project 2025 reportedly suggested medals for mothers before being told it would evoke Nazism.
Their own words are meaningless. Their entire bit about Jews changing position to subvert was projection of themselves. Just look at how they totally didn't work with the communists to suppress the SPD.
The accurate statement of what retarded Nazis believe is what passed after the Enabling Act.
You said foundation. The Enabling Act was the consolidation of power after the foundation and superstructure was long built. I'm working on filling in these gaps in people's education.
My point is that what they were before that is irrelevant. Hitler was like any other politician - he lied to gain power from the specific demographics that he needed to win.
With a majority female electorate, he practically had the win guaranteed if he offered them enough free shit, but he also pretended to support working men to peel away votes from the SPD, just in case the active suppression of SPD voters by him and his commie buddies the KPD wasn't enough.
The NSDAP was a pro-female, natalist party, backed by open feminists to the point that the UK introduced laws allowing locking feminists up for their Nazi sympathizing after the colossal failure that was the British Union of Fascists election campaign.
He was a man with daddy issues who took women's side on everything and thought sex for anything other than procreation was evil.
Was he even born with a penis or was he the true predecessor to David Reimer?
He was a natalist with no kids, it's fucking hilarious when you think about it. Not even he himself, despite pouring his entire political legacy into it, wanted to have children.
I guess the modern equivalent of that is perennially absent father Musk, friend of Epstein, whining about birth rates.
I understand you are $omehow motivated to keep tying everything directly to ending reproduction among the class of contributors here without providing any ideas for how the human race should be reproducing, but this statement goes against 99% of reporting on Hitler's sex life.
He had no kids because he personally acted like sexual stimulation was in fact for everything other than procreation.
The fact that he preached large families to the Catholic populace doesn't speak about his own behavior.
Anti-natalists don't need to be paid, our ideology is self-evident. The idea of "providing an alternative" is asinine, we simply advise that a group of child rapists are trying to influence society using taxpayer money to push terrible contracts on you.
Would someone need to "provide an alternative" when calling out any other kind of fraud? Does he need to offer alternative investments if he tells you AppLovin is the next stock to crash 90%?
Yes, he was a massive hypocrite, I'm well aware. He would preach how meaningless sex was Jewish corruption and then proceed to do exactly that.
Then why do you have to spam your retarded viewpoints everywhere?
Because it makes you cry, Josephine.
Yes, you need to provide an alternative when your theory is basically don't have kids. The only thing I've heard is that having kids will happen naturally anyway, which is true, which makes it crazy to say you're against people speaking well of having kids when you know there's no other way to retain a human race.
It's self-evident that all human society has spoken well of having kids for this reason and not because of some plot. It's more likely that the plot is not to have kids and there are massive evidences that such a plot exists.
Society has never conferred special financial benefits to parents except in autocratic states. The entire idea of birth incentives came from the fucking Soviet Union.
I don't have much to add to what JosephMalta said, but I might as well add this.
The entire foundation of Nazism was a retarded natalist set of beliefs. Right down to handing medals to women for having kids - it was all about creating an environment for women to be worshipped for their wombs.
Ironically, Project 2025 reportedly suggested medals for mothers before being told it would evoke Nazism.
Did you even read the founding documents of the (NS)DAP? All that came later to cater to the Catholics and Lutherans.
Their own words are meaningless. Their entire bit about Jews changing position to subvert was projection of themselves. Just look at how they totally didn't work with the communists to suppress the SPD.
The accurate statement of what retarded Nazis believe is what passed after the Enabling Act.
You said foundation. The Enabling Act was the consolidation of power after the foundation and superstructure was long built. I'm working on filling in these gaps in people's education.
My point is that what they were before that is irrelevant. Hitler was like any other politician - he lied to gain power from the specific demographics that he needed to win.
With a majority female electorate, he practically had the win guaranteed if he offered them enough free shit, but he also pretended to support working men to peel away votes from the SPD, just in case the active suppression of SPD voters by him and his commie buddies the KPD wasn't enough.
The NSDAP was a pro-female, natalist party, backed by open feminists to the point that the UK introduced laws allowing locking feminists up for their Nazi sympathizing after the colossal failure that was the British Union of Fascists election campaign.