All wars are jewish wars
(media.scored.co)
Comments (5)
sorted by:
"If my son's didn't want wars, there wouldn't be any" - Gutle Rothschild, (1753–1849)
According to the Talmud Gutle is correct: "the Talmud urges Jews to do a variety of harms to Christians, such as murder and theft, and teaches that each death of a Christian serves as a substitute for the Temple sacrifices, which would then hasten the arrival of the Jewish messiah." - The Talmud Unmasked
Pranaitis, Talmud Unmasked, is relatively balanced but not perfect. But your quote doesn't come from your link of him. Page 62 of your version has his propositions "V. A Jew who Kills a Christian Commits No Sin, but Offers an Acceptable Sacrifice to God"; "VI. After the Destruction of the Temple at Jerusalem, the only Sacrifice Nexessary is the Extermination of Christians"; "VII. Those Who Kill Christians shall have a High Place in Heaven". However, the passages used are not Talmud but come from medieval sources, and none of them refer directly to Christians as such but only to "kliphoth" (husks or empty souls), impious, unclean, "the non-Jew [who] refuses to be redeemed", idolatrous, people who worship idols. The Talmud (and Mosaic) position is that if someone worships idols or is polytheistic (including tritheistic), that is worthy of death by execution; but there is no place in the Talmud that rules on Christianity, or on developing trinitarianism, or on Jesus (other than the ruling that the Sanhedrin gave Jesus all his legal rights). Therefore the Talmud leaves individual Jews to judge Christians for themselves.
Your quote comes from Wikipedia, claiming to cite Richard Levy in Antisemitism vol. 1, 2005. (However, WP's actual quote from Levy comes from vol. 2, pp. 564-565.) The actual quote of Levy is, 564: Pranaitis "sought to demonstrate that the Talmud obliged Jews to injure Christians in multifarious ways and to work for their elimination." Note above, though, Pranaitis did not actually successfully demonstrate this because he took it as assumed that idolater automatically includes Christian, when this is (cagily) never actually stated in the Talmud.
Your quote comes from a paraphrase of Robert Michael, Dictionary of Antisemitism 2007, quoted later in the article: "According to Pranaitis, the Talmud urged Jews to murder Christians, as each death of a Christian, serving as a substitute for the Temple sacrifices, would hasten the arrival of the Jewish messiah." I do not find anything about murder hastening the Messiah in Pranaitis; this appears a hasty generalization by Michael.
TLDR: So when Wikipedia mistakenly says what Levy says that Michael instead says when Michael mistakenly says what Pranaitis says when Pranaitis mistakenly says what the Zohar says that the Talmud instead doesn't say, it is not said "according to the Talmud".
Where's u/swampranger to defend the words written by his talmud
It's as if he wants to be illogical and make nazis look illogical. I just posted that there is no such person as Reichorn or Reichhorn, that that name is not in the list of chief rabbis of (or "in") France, and that the original source of these words was a fictional novel, Biarritz by Hermann Goedsche (pen name John Retcliffe), 1868. The passage was modified and expanded by anti-Semitic articles in French periodicals later, showing that it cannot possibly be a real person or event.
Expecting Nazis to tell the truth is like expecting a hooker to make a good housewife.