Pranaitis, Talmud Unmasked, is relatively balanced but not perfect. But your quote doesn't come from your link of him. Page 62 of your version has his propositions "V. A Jew who Kills a Christian Commits No Sin, but Offers an Acceptable Sacrifice to God"; "VI. After the Destruction of the Temple at Jerusalem, the only Sacrifice Nexessary is the Extermination of Christians"; "VII. Those Who Kill Christians shall have a High Place in Heaven". However, the passages used are not Talmud but come from medieval sources, and none of them refer directly to Christians as such but only to "kliphoth" (husks or empty souls), impious, unclean, "the non-Jew [who] refuses to be redeemed", idolatrous, people who worship idols. The Talmud (and Mosaic) position is that if someone worships idols or is polytheistic (including tritheistic), that is worthy of death by execution; but there is no place in the Talmud that rules on Christianity, or on developing trinitarianism, or on Jesus (other than the ruling that the Sanhedrin gave Jesus all his legal rights). Therefore the Talmud leaves individual Jews to judge Christians for themselves.

Your quote comes from Wikipedia, claiming to cite Richard Levy in Antisemitism vol. 1, 2005. (However, WP's actual quote from Levy comes from vol. 2, pp. 564-565.) The actual quote of Levy is, 564: Pranaitis "sought to demonstrate that the Talmud obliged Jews to injure Christians in multifarious ways and to work for their elimination." Note above, though, Pranaitis did not actually successfully demonstrate this because he took it as assumed that idolater automatically includes Christian, when this is (cagily) never actually stated in the Talmud.

Your quote comes from a paraphrase of Robert Michael, Dictionary of Antisemitism 2007, quoted later in the article: "According to Pranaitis, the Talmud urged Jews to murder Christians, as each death of a Christian, serving as a substitute for the Temple sacrifices, would hasten the arrival of the Jewish messiah." I do not find anything about murder hastening the Messiah in Pranaitis; this appears a hasty generalization by Michael.

TLDR: So when Wikipedia mistakenly says what Levy says that Michael instead says when Michael mistakenly says what Pranaitis says when Pranaitis mistakenly says what the Zohar says that the Talmud instead doesn't say, it is not said "according to the Talmud".