Help me collect videos
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
I don't think you can label all the found skeletons under this, they have distinct features far from just mal-nourishment
I'm not sure about that, we have figures and small statues of reptilians from ancient civilizations
Explaining everything by "creation" is not what I'm looking for because it explains nothing: "God did it" and ultimately god also exist just like that, the most high being in this existence exist just like that without an explanation.
I've looked at quite a few skeleton schematics as a complete amateur, they all meet this criterion. Denisovans are interesting, like pygmies are interesting.
I'd love postings anywhere about ancient evidence of humanoid reptilians.
I've discovered that believing in divine creation means actually explaining nothing by divine creation. Rather, it means knowing that everything has an explanation, and receiving those explanations when needed, and knowing (unlike the scientists) that there is always more to the unexplained. Scientists who pretend to being close to explaining everything belie themselves about their theories always containing some unexplained element. So the theist who is frank about all science containing an unexplained element should not get heat for it. Especially when he is willing to say an explanation for anything can be found in time (which doesn't contradict there always being an unexplained remainder). Rather than guess which details you're referring to, I'll let you ask if there is something you think I'm leaving unexplained to you.
Looking forward to your thoughts, as I intended to supplement and not to oppose.
I don't mind opposing, as long as we share the same goal, looking for truth..
but the problem with folks like you is that you already found the truth, and i dont understand what are you doing here? teach us who are still lagging behind? at the end you will tell me the truth is jesus, come on..
with all due respect to your person but the idea of skeletons of other humanoids like neaderthals being mal-nutrioned is total bullshit, we have hundreds of skulls, they share destinct features, if you have a counter-argument then it better be well presented and researched.
Well said! Obviously I'm being nonspecific with evidence I've seen, and there are variations of explanation besides malnutrition, but if any humanoid skull had other than 46-chromosome DNA it'd be instant news.
I seek to be open-minded about Jesus. I'm pretty confident he's the Truth, but my knowledge is always growing and transforming, and if there is something more to Truth than my understanding of that man then I want and need to know it. I often agree with people who stop short of attributing the Truth they know to being Jesus, because Truth guides everyone to the same place eventually, and it's not up to me whether Truth hypothetically guides me away from Jesus. So if you prefer I don't lay Jesus on thick, I'm capable of doing that. I find that an anarchic situation like Conspiracies is one of the best places to challenge my views and refine those that are in fact mistaken.
Applying that to the subject, in the past month I've been exploring origin data that informs black holes and it actually connects to the idea of sentient cryptids in a way where I need to be more open to the subject. As I've said I've just entered the discovery phase of that idea and don't have significant thoughts about it, other than to shelve my prior reluctance to review the subject. So you've got me in a very receptive mood. Did you want to pick one or two primary lines of evidence of physical sentience beyond the 46-chromosome model, so that we could interact with them directly? Or did you want to focus on speciation within Homo that defies the genetic identity of interfertility?
Very well! i like your mindset, thats exactly the scientific way, im also open to everything and anything, i dont marry ideas nor i get attached to them, the moment i see they are faulty i throw them. thats how we advance.
so about chromosomes, neanderthals and others have 46 not 48, the fusion occured in way older times, neanderthals are very new and happened after the fusion
id like to hear your thoughts about both lines of evidence.