Is It Blue Beamy?
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (5)
sorted by:
There would need to be testing, that's my theory.
Instead of it all being lights, what if they can also rearrange molecules..
All implies light (singular)...others suggest lights (plural) to rearrange the perspective of each being.
Mole (mass) cule (diminutive)...ones consent to what another rearranges implies aug-MENT-ative aka within ones mind. It's your consent to the suggested word "molecule" which augments whatever you're looking at, hence putting an artificial label on a moving nature.
a) Rearranging implies putting into (life) a line (inception towards death) aka ones response within the range of nature.
b) Ones consent to the suggested word "rearrange" binds one to a range/hring (circle)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange aka circular thinking (logic) turning into a conflict (reason).
What's a beam? A ray of light, which implies the internal separation of all light into each ray. Beam also implies baum (tree) aka the growth of each seeded ray within the soil of all light.
As for blue/bhel - "to shine"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*bhel- which implies each ray within all light being (life) send forth (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Pink-floyd-shine-on-you-crazy-diamond-lyrics
a) A ray within light cannot take anything into "my" possession without distorting self.
b) Theory implies ones oration (ory) of theism (the)...a giving away to tempt others to hold onto.
c) Only within praxis (natural) can theory (artifice) be shaped.
Yes, but do you think it's possible? What are the odds between manipulation and actual 'visitation'?
He always spams this stuff that goes nowhere. It's a dead end. It is a tunnel in the fashion of Wile E coyote.
Eh, he has his moments. Sometimes the run through expands what I wasn't thinking yet.