TL;DR: We’ll discuss the identical twin to the Ludlow Massacre and figure out why you’ve never seen it mentioned. This post is the second part of:

A tale of (one of) two massacres: the Ludlow Massacre was staged which is why you’re allowed to talk about it (also, the Salem Witches and yes, I found the Parker) (conspiracies.win 9/4/2025)

The first thing to realize is that this massacre is so low-profile it doesn’t even have an “official” name. We’re going to call it the “Forbes Massacre”. This is all wiki has to say about it on the Ludlow Massacre page:

On March 10, 1914, a replacement worker's body was found on the railroad tracks near Forbes, Colorado. The National Guard said the strikers had murdered the man. In retaliation, [Colorado National Guard General John] Chase ordered the Forbes tent colony destroyed.

“That’s not a massacre,” you say. Correct, it isn’t. That Wiki page does not even reference the other massacre at all. Probably the most important thing to understand about how history is written is that it is always shaped by leaving out context. Since Ludlow is always discussed—even by conspiracy theorists—as an isolated incident where the “pot boiled over”, the mind automatically and reasonably and incorrectly assumes that was the only notable event that occurred.

The larger context was the Colorado Coalfield War of 1913-1914. On that page, wiki at least gives us two paragraphs on the “Battle of Forbes, 30 April”, only ten days after Ludlow and about five miles south. Wiki summarizes it thusly:

Strikers were initially repulsed by machine gun fire, but the weapon quickly became jammed, encouraging the attackers to charge into the camp and set most of the structures alight…. In total, nine of the Forbes camp were killed, including four Japanese strikebreakers. At least three strikers were killed by returning fire, including two by the machine gun.

It’s like they found a writer who does the exact opposite of someone hyping a shitty movie. This article paints the scene a bit more vividly for us:

Regional History – We remembered Ludlow but forgot Forbes (World Journal Newspaper 2/7/2019)

The estimated 300 strikers kept up a relentless barrage on the camp, then ran through camp throwing oil on the tipple and buildings, all the while shouting “Remember Ludlow!”. Even the mule barn was set ablaze, killing 37 mules and horses…. The entire camp, tipple, company buildings, homes, boardinghouses, barns, even the post office, were leveled by flames. The county coroner later revealed he had received a dozen bodies from this conflict.

That’s the movie you want to see, isn’t it? Has a lot more of a “rampage-y” feel. For the closest first-hand source, the local paper covered it in this brief article:

15 MEN KILLED IN BATTLE AT FORBES | Denver Weekly Post, Volume 11, Number 647, May 9, 1914 (Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection)

You really need to go look at the newspaper layout, though, because the article about this massacre is adjacent to an advertisement for “Book of Personal Advice Free to Any Man” which is twice the column-inches. Imagine all we would have to hear today if fifteen trannies got killed.

Let’s summarize the numbers. For Ludlow using “modern estimates”, we get 19 strikers (5 men, 2 women, 12 children) and 1 strikebreaker. For Forbes, we get 4 strikers (no bystanders) and 11 strikebreakers, with the entire mining camp destroyed. Starting to see why “They” don’t want you to know about Forbes?

“They” got their asses handed to them. The mine superintendent didn’t even bother calling the sheriff. The local militia was already tied up at the nearby Battle of Walsenberg. The governor and the National Guard stood down. They weren’t going to tangle with 300 armed and angry working men. The Weekly Post article mentions this near the end:

Nine of the mine guards who escaped from the camp were taken prisoners by the strikers, who threatened to put them to death on the spot.

Forbes could have been way worse. “They” took a gigantic “L” and that’s why you’ve never heard of it. As a rule, any time “They” take a big loss, it gets Memory Holed as quickly as possible. As part of learned helplessness, you don’t ever get to know that you’re not helpless. They don’t deny what happened or try very hard to rewrite history, it just gets swept away, filed under “Things We Don’t Talk About”.

Another perfect example: the Georgia Guidestones. Did you wonder exactly what happened? There was never even a rumor of who did it but I can tell you for a fact “They” took another big “L” on that one. The earth was literally scraped clean within a couple of days. The local sheriff didn’t try looking for the perps or even announce, “Hey, just so everyone knows: you can’t go around blowing up shit that doesn’t belong to you.” How could that be so, here in Gitmo Nation? The Salem Witches, that’s how.

Exact same thing with Forbes. Eleven manslaughters and a whole mine destroyed, and there is no evidence whatsoever that any authority anywhere at any time tried to hold anyone responsible for any of it. They lost and so They slammed the door shut on it. They came back at it another time in another way, but that’s a story for another day.

As for this Forbes Mine, you can forget about digging up any background info on it. The articles I linked are about all we have to go on. Starting with the name “Forbes”, though, we found out how dark and suspicious they are:

Meet the Forbes: Opium Wars, hidden aristocracy, Beverly Hills, Salem Witches, Parkers and more (conspiracies.win 8/21/2025)

Is the name of the mine mere coincidence? Sure, maybe. But we also found some Salem names in this writeup:

From Dr. Joseph P. Farrell to Linda Moulton-Howe to John Cusack: the wacky and hidden genealogy of the Nichols family of Salem Witches (conspiracies.win 8/27/2025)

Namely the names were Nichols and Martin. And what did we find at the massacres? The Forbes Mine superintendent was Robert Nichols and the local undersheriff was Zeke Martin. As to the sole acknowledged strikebreaker fatality at Ludlow:

However, modern historians assert that only one of the militia's number, a private named Martin of the National Guard, was killed. Martin was fatally shot in the neck, presumably by strikers.

That’s too weird a coincidence, and I get the feeling one of Their plants got smoked during whatever shenanigans they were trying to pull off. Maybe his cover got blown and the miners took care of business. It was worse at Forbes, though. In a lesser, previous ass-kicking on October 17, 1913:

What with one thing and another, the camp was pockmarked with machine gun bullets, partially razed by fire, and Under sheriff Zeke Martin and Deputy C.W. Kennedy were dead, along with a mine guard and possibly others.

During the rampage, Superintendent Nichols hid in his house with his wife and children. Along with a couple of dead Martins and “possibly others”, this was all hitting too close to home for the Salem Witches, know what I mean?

Now, it’s a bit too much to sort out all these various corporate entities floating around, but the Ludlow wiki states that the strike was organized by workers for the Rocky Mountain Fuel Company. Recall that the Coalfield War began in the fall of 1913, then check this out:

Company President E.E. Shumway died in 1914 from injuries sustained while investigating the aftermath of the disastrous 1913 explosion that killed 37 miners at the Coryell Vulcan mine in Garfield County. David W. Brown (1860-1922), who joined RM Fuel in about 1900, succeeded Shumway.

I can’t find any genealogy for that guy and I understand that’s a common name, but Brown is indeed one of the Salem Witch families. There was Dave right outside the spotlight when Shumway “died suddenly and conveniently”. I feel like I’ve almost given up believing in coincidences.

Speaking of moles, looks like there was an even more obvious one in the Baldwin–Felts Detective Agency. I never had specific occasion to bring them up, but if you’ve looked through the links of this post and the preceding one, you will have seen that agency come up over and over. They were the primary armed thugs used by the capitalists, the Blackwater of the day.

We actually have a “mole+mole” situation, in that Baldwin-Felts employed a spy named Charles Everett Lively (1887-1962):

… who infiltrated the UMWA in West Virginia and other states, was tasked with spying on the miners in Colorado and killed a man, for which he pleaded self-defense.

It gets worse when you read this from his wiki:

His participation in three killings, with scant consequences, cemented his reputation as one of the most violent opponents of efforts to unionize the coal fields. He has been called "the deadliest man in the West Virginia-Colorado coal mine wars".

Wait—what Spooky group always seems to skate? I guess that brings up the question: was Lively a spy for an early 20th Century PMC who was actually a Salem Witch operative, monitoring and shaping events from the inside?

If you examine the genealogy for Charles Everett Lively, you will find that his mother was born Ameretta Ann Parsons and his wife was born Ollie Mae Hale. Their genealogies dry up real quick, but you may wish to refer to Mary Bliss Parsons (1628-1712), “The Witch of Northampton” who also ultimately traces to Jack Parsons, and John Hale (1636-1700), "one of the most prominent and influential ministers associated with the witch trials".

Bonus regarding a certain family herein mentioned: Do you remember the name of the guy flogging the “true story” of MH370, which was that UFO orbs had teleported the airplane out of our dimension or something? Imagine how unexpected this was:

Professor Dave Explains | Ashton Forbes Is a Grifting Fraud (YouTube 6/12/2025 1:02:15)

Professor Dave Explains | The Very Expected Meltdown of Ashton Forbes (YouTube 6/24/2025 54:51)

Not that I’m suggesting you waste your time on anything to do with any of this but if you insist, pay special attention to the parts where Forbes is on cam, or just look up a video of one of his presentations.

Not to put ideas in your head, but this guy 100% believes what he’s saying. In this sense, he’s not lying as one would conventionally conceptualize. You will find no stress and no “tells”. That’s a psychopath for you.

It turns out that these generational Satanists use SRA functionally to prevent children from ever progressing beyond the state where young children have “an unclear sense of difference between fact and fiction”. That’s what mainstream scientists would say. They argue about the age but it’s about seven.

I would put a finer point on it which would apply to both young children and these psychopathic generational Satanists: it’s not that they cannot discern fact from fiction, it’s that they place no abstract value on it and therefore may simply refrain from doing so if that is to their advantage.

Then again, maybe it’s just complete coincidence that we find Ashton Forbes heavily promoted while spewing this utter horseshit for no discernable benefit and with no discernable compunction.

Well, the elephant in the room is a singularly prominent American family associated with Ludlow among many other things. That’s coming next. Thanks for reading this one!