Stretching a bit. Technology who's time has come will be made.
Oppenheimer ran a large team. He was chosen for his communication skills, which were not a hallmark for typical research scientists.
There are at least three people that all claim to have invented the USB thumb drive, all within a span of mere months, and IBM was trying to beat everyone to getting parents on it, during that same short period in 1999. It was ready to be made.
John McCarthy was an academic that knew good ideas when he saw them. He gets called the father of AI because of being at the right place and time to deal with people, and their papers, working on it's beginnings. But, he deserves car less real credit than many others in that, and related, fields. Not to say he wasn't influential, but even the most cursory looking into things will show is not deserving of his need pop culture status.
John von Neuman is one of many. The standard instruction-level memory architecture of most computers is based of his work, and he was legit. He did a lot of pure math work that was out there, but genuinely useful, and did a good bit of theory crafting to help bridge computability with early physical computers. But, he didn't even come up with 95% of what we call Von Neuman architecture, even. He took the idea from others, and worked a few remaining details out, and championed it as the best way to make a general purpose computer. AFAIK, he never tried to take all the credit, either.
The microprocessor had numerous inventors. The first complete one was made by a team of three people, only one of whom Jewish.
Those are just the ones I already know enough about to see red flags when reading the list.
Do you really want the Jew to torture and exterminate you?
Based on history, that's a dumb question. The better question in how much work are you are willing to do, and how far can you suppress your conscience, to go along and get along? I'm sure millions of starved Russians, everyone tortured in their gulags, and all those touched by the CIA, Mossad, et al, really wanted they got.
Stretching a bit. Technology who's time has come will be made.
Oppenheimer ran a large team. He was chosen for his communication skills, which were not a hallmark for typical research scientists.
There are at least three people that all claim to have invented the USB thumb drive, all within a span of mere months, and IBM was trying to beat everyone to getting parents on it, during that same short period in 1999. It was ready to be made.
John McCarthy was an academic that knew good ideas when he saw them. He gets called the father of AI because of being at the right place and time to deal with people, and their papers, working on it's beginnings. But, he deserves car less real credit than many others in that, and related, fields. Not to say he wasn't influential, but even the most cursory looking into things will show is not deserving of his need pop culture status.
John von Neuman is one of many. The standard instruction-level memory architecture of most computers is based of his work, and he was legit. He did a lot of pure math work that was out there, but genuinely useful, and did a good bit of theory crafting to help bridge computability with early physical computers. But, he didn't even come up with 95% of what we call Von Neuman architecture, even. He took the idea from others, and worked a few remaining details out, and championed it as the best way to make a general purpose computer. AFAIK, he never tried to take all the credit, either.
The microprocessor had numerous inventors. The first complete one was made by a team of three people, only one of whom Jewish.
Those are just the ones I already know enough about to see red flags when reading the list.
Based on history, that's a dumb question. The better question in how much work are you are willing to do, and how far can you suppress your conscience, to go along and get along? I'm sure millions of starved Russians, everyone tortured in their gulags, and all those touched by the CIA, Mossad, et al, really wanted they got.