TL;DR: We confront one of two massacres which were practically the same, taking place a few miles from one another and only a week-and-a-half apart. They have been handled very differently by history. Discussion of that other (real) massacre will have to wait for another post. Those differences give us key insights into how “They” operate, and you can use those insights to efficiently unravel and understand other events both past and future.
Because the event has now become Conspiracy 201, it’s important in and of itself to know that one of the high-profile outrages of the Rockefellers known as the Ludlow Massacre was staged. We’re only going to review a fraction of the evidence. As to the rest, I’m going to recommend a documentary that does not declare it was staged, but I think you’ll be able to see that for yourself when you watch with a certain mindset.
It was a few years back when I researched the Ludlow Massacre and realized it was fake, or at least that it was supposed to be. Right after that, in what was probably an authentic coincidence, the talented and well-known (in conspiracy circles) filmmakers Aaron and Melissa Dykes published a short documentary on it:
Forgotten History: The Ludlow Massacre and the PR Machine (Truthstream Media 5/31/2022 42:21)
I thought it was very well done, except that it completely missed the underlying nature of the event. Not an ironic joke—I mean exactly that.
You see, at several points during the film, the narrator Melissa is perplexed at how and why certain things have happened. One example is that staged photographs were taken. There are pictures of the strikebreakers’ machine gun emplacement. Who would so document their upcoming massacre? Others show the militia behind cover during a firefight with the strikers, but taken from in front of them. She just cannot understand why they did these things.
Well, yes, that’s the crucial point: she thinks the events actually took place as we’ve been told. When you switch paradigms and understand that They will lie and deceive even about things which are apparently negative for Them, those baffling “facts” suddenly turn into evidence of the staging.
Near the end, Melissa is at a loss, perplexed that the fallout of it leaves the public seeing “Rocky” (John D. Rockefeller Jr.) as a hero. Outrageous! The paradigm shift, where you can put a black box around the internal machinery and look at what went in and what came out, helps us understand what was really going on.
A couple of important things went in. One was that the miners worked in terrible conditions, with very low pay, and in settlements completely controlled by the companies. Because of that and the rest of the plutocratic antics, the Rockefellers and their ilk were absolutely despised by the public. Something was bound to break against Them.
I have not yet had a chance to write it up, but the Salem Witches were behind the whole Progressive movement. When you consider all the Progressive insanity today, it should come as no surprise that They started it all Themselves well over a century ago. Maybe you’re slapping your forehead now.
The basic plan for these miners who might be “getting ideas”: precipitate a strike, run a psyop to shut it down apparently violently, then have Their controlled opposition come in and save the day with “organized labor”. Their assets were doing the organizing, of course, and I think anyone who has worked in an organized labor job can testify as to how little—even today—the organizers care about the membership.
It’ll take us a while to get there, but this false flag looks like it got out of control and the Rockefellers ended up looking terrible. Might as well turn lemons into lemonade: they brought in PR to make Junior look like the big savior of the big mess. Huge success!
Now look, I wasn’t there and I do not know who actually got killed, but what I would argue is that what actually happened was something other than “indiscriminate killing of striking miners”, which is exactly what we are sold. Might they have wasted some inconvenient people along the way and tossed them on the big “massacre” pile? Sure, but we’ll never know.
What we’ll do is look at the best documented murder of the Ludlow Massacre and find that it’s nonsense. Thus, you have little chance of firmly showing who else got killed, by who, and why. That case concerns a certain hero miner named Louis Tikas. He’s the literally iconic martyr of the event, brutally murdered in cold blood by pitiless Rockefeller goons, an idea which lasts right up until you actually begin to put his story together for yourself. There’s a monument to Ludlow featuring Tikas, enough to tell you the story we’re handed is phony.
Tikas was an immigrant from Crete and by 1910, after 24 years in the US, he was part owner of a Greek coffeehouse in (the very Spooky city of) Denver. By the end of 1912, just before all this Coalfield War shit started popping off, he was an organizer for the United Mine Workers of America and the main labor union organizer at the Ludlow camp during the strike.
No reason is given for the profound change in career, nor record of him being a miner. In between, he was—get this—a strikebreaker. In his wiki profile photo, you can see he’s wearing a suit and some kind of badge. I don’t think it’s because he was a fancy Jew, I think he was repping The Man. I mean, how loudly can you say “plant”?
Now, I used the word “staged” because that was what Ludlow was supposed to be, but a longer and more accurate term would have been, “a staged event that got out of control and we don’t know exactly what happened”. Pretty clumsy.
Various details of the massacre are scattered among different accounts, but let’s focus on a certain passage from the wiki of the on-scene commander of the Colorado National Guard, Major Patrick J. Hamrock. Because Tikas was a plant, he was meeting with his counterpart when the miners he had left unattended started acting on their own and shit came unglued:
At 8:50 AM, Hamrock met Tikas at the agreed location, whereupon Tikas informed the troops and distraught woman that the man in question was not in the Ludlow Colony. Greek miners moving in a flanking fashion towards an arroyo were seen by National Guardsmen who were emplacing the second machine gun. Tikas rushed back to the camp, reportedly carrying a white handkerchief in an attempt to prevent a fight. Hamrock also failed to reach his own lines before the gunfire began. Who fired the first shot is unclear…. Hamrock would testify that he was among the first to man a machine gun, stating he had fired at points near the colony, rather than directly into it.
You can believe whatever you like about the events, but that neatly sums up my scenario, does it not? Most of the victims (maybe all, who knows) were killed by smoke inhalation when the camp somehow caught fire that evening. There’s nothing as chaotic and uncontrollable as fire when you’re trying to run a simple psyop.
Okay, abort mission. Tikas’ cover might have been blown by that point—who knows—but he needed to exfil. I contend faking his own martyrdom was the chosen method. It is the only death documented with any substance, and purportedly came at the hands of militia commander Lieutenant Karl Linderfelt.
In hazy and conflicting circumstances, Tikas comes into contact with Linderfelt, who breaks his rifle butt bashing in Tikas’ skull. Tikas is then shot three times—including in the back—and bleeds to death. Phony, or just hard to kill?. There are a couple of contemporaneous accounts of the murder of Tikas, so this is the best you’re going to get:
Eyewitness to Murder: Recounting the Ludlow Massacre
Two Bits for a Tragic Tale: Walter Fink’s The Ludlow Massacre
If you can take those accounts along with what is written in the wikis of Tikas, Hamrock, and Linderfelt and come up with a sensible and coherent narrative to present as the opening argument in the trial for the murder of Louis Tikas, then… well, you’re not going to but you’re welcome to try.
Just as we saw on January 6 with Ray Epps, a hallmark of assets working a staged event is that they escape all punishment. So what happened with Hamrock and Linderfelt? At least this, which is way more than happens today:
Hamrock was court-martialed for his actions at Ludlow on 13 May 1914. He was charged with murder, larceny, and other crimes associated with the death of Tikas and other unarmed strikers, as well as the twelve children and two women killed during the battle and militia-set fire that followed.
Linderfelt was court-martialed too. Both of them and everybody else completely skated on all charges, of course. This gem seemed particularly insulting:
While Linderfelt was found responsible for the deaths of Tikas and other strikers that exhibited execution-style injuries, he and all others were acquitted. Linderfelt admitted to striking Tikas with his Springfield rifle. The military court found Linderfelt guilty of the assault on Tikas, "but attach[ed] no criminality" to his actions.
Oh, see? We’re all free to do that stuff too. Seriously, though, that “execution-style injuries” thing? What I surmise is that anyone who wasn’t “going along with the program” or was otherwise inconvenient in some way just got disposed of and became a statistic in the “massacre”. We’ll never sort it out at this point.
Anyway, from here what I would suggest is this: Go watch that very well-made documentary with all the foregoing in mind, and keep trying to convince yourself those things really happened as we are told. That in itself is the shift in paradigm, since no one watches such documentaries with such doubts in their mind.
If you’re like me, you will find it much more plausible to conclude that no, they did not, and thus the Ludlow Massacre was staged and that Melissa and every other conspiracy theorist is trapped in a paradigm. If you cannot see these things as I’ve described, well, typing more words into a social media post is not going to change that.
Assuming you’re still on board, you’re in a third stage of understanding the Ludlow Massacre. The first stage—the normie stage—was that you’d never heard of it. That’s because it was a psyop. As a rule, once a psyop is complete They quit talking about it because there is nothing to be gained, there is only downside for exposure.
The second stage was when you heard about this “outrage” somewhere in the conspir-o-sphere. “OMG,” you thought, “those Rockefellers are buttholes. I knew it.” And that’s where the hook was set. As a rule, you cannot let your emotional reactions impel you towards any conclusions. It’s all too easy for you to revel in how ”right” you were all along. “They” know this fault in reasoning and They use it all the time.
See, you hated the Rockefellers before and then you found another reason to hate them in the Ludlow Massacre. In reality, you swallowed yet another lie that distorted your worldview, and it cost them nothing extra at all.
We finally arrive at the question, “Were these the doings of the Salem Witches?” I find I’m always asking that question these days. First, are the Rockefellers—who were behind Ludlow—connected to the Salem Witches? Well, that’s a long story which will have to wait for another post, but now I also feel I’ve given away the answer. In the meantime, I’ll give you other tasty morsels to chew on, directly related to Ludlow.
I did some brief research into the National Guard commander, General John Chase. I couldn’t get anywhere. I’ve picked up clues along the way that the Chases (think JP Morgan Chase & Co., $4 trillion total assets) are one of the Salem Witch families. The writeup on them will have to wait. In the meantime, stick that claim in your back pocket as you read up on John’s role in the Colorado Coalfield War:
He came under extensive criticism for ordering mass arrests and detentions of strikers and others who spoke publicly in favor of the strikers or who criticized the National Guard…. When the judge ordered the prisoners released, Chase refused to follow the order from the civil court until the Governor of Colorado directed him to do so. Chase was court-martialed for his actions, but Colorado Governor James H. Peabody restored him to the command of the National Guard.
Who acts like that and then skates? Salem Witches do, right? Next, starting early in the documentary, Aaron and Melissa spend quite a long time castigating a guy that the Rockefellers kept on the payroll for nearly 50 years as the chief surgeon of Colorado Fuel & Iron:
Dr. Richard Corwin and Colorado’s Changing Racial Divide (History Colorado 3/18/2021)
As the doc and that article tell us, he was a vile eugenicist. His full name was Richard Warren Corwin. I didn’t do the genealogy and I’ve never written up the families, but you may reference Mary Warren, "an accuser and later confessed witch… a servant for John and Elizabeth Proctor", and Jonathan Corwin, "merchant, politician, and magistrate, best known as one of the judges involved in the Salem witch trials of 1692".
Late in the film, starting about the 30 minute mark, discussion begins on the “PR Machine” referenced in the title, which comes in the form of Ivy Ledbetter Lee (1877-1934). Even though it’s quite clear that Aaron and Melissa have done a tremendous amount of detailed research, they never mention that Ivy was working in the context of the firm he co-founded, Parker and Lee.
That was only the third ever public relations agency to be established in the United States. Now, maybe you’re thinking it was all on the up and up and his partner, George F. Parker, was just some guy. Maybe! But then again:
The firm came under fire during WWII because it had done consulting work for German industrial giant IG Farben.
Nuff said? We cover the other massacre next. Thanks for reading!