a) Nature implies the electing process; each being within the selecting potential....tempted by the attraction of one another.
b) Knowing implies process (perceivable) passing through potential (perception). Thinking implies shaping both what passes through (electric perception) and what attracted one to hold onto (magnetic suggestion). Which is where one selects what to think...
c) Holding onto magnetic (suggested information) attracts more, while burdening self with it. Resisting that temptation builds resistance; drawn from the electric (perceivable inspiration) passing through.
Ok and??
a) Nature implies the electing process; each being within the selecting potential....tempted by the attraction of one another.
b) Knowing implies process (perceivable) passing through potential (perception). Thinking implies shaping both what passes through (electric perception) and what attracted one to hold onto (magnetic suggestion). Which is where one selects what to think...
c) Holding onto magnetic (suggested information) attracts more, while burdening self with it. Resisting that temptation builds resistance; drawn from the electric (perceivable inspiration) passing through.
Nature generates; resisting temptation re-generates.
d) What's the opposite of attraction...repulsion aka repel (to drive away). That's nature driving each being (life) away (inception towards death).
e) Nature WAS electric; before a magnetic conflict aka IS vs ISN'T can be shaped among beings.
tl;dr: Why is it that one needs (electric) less, but always wants (magnetic) more?