You don't say!
(media.scored.co)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
I generally agree with what you're getting at, but you can't take a chat with a language model as proof or even evidence, of something like this. The fact that so many people do is concerning... AI governance will be celebrated
The chat only proves definetly that AI has a bias and that it lacks the ability to discuss abstract subjects that involve logic as it was trained using data from users that are unable to reach such levels of cognition.
It's just trained as a word predictor, there is no logic happening
If logic implies circular thinking, then predicting the course of a circle implies waiting for what comes around again, and again, and again...
What if few tempt many into logic to establish a predicament (predictable mind)?
https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ai/what-is-large-language-model/
I don't understand if that's supposed to be a refutation, but LLMs do not use logic
That was a refutation of your oversimplification. LMMs can process logical statements as proven by the above chat.
LLMs can process logical statements but are not engaging in a logical process
Never claimed that.
Taking and giving statements within any court of law is based on an artificial language model as proof or evidence...not on nature.
AI can only feed back what those using it have freely given, hence giving artificial authority is based on shirking ones response-ability (free will of choice) within nature.
a) Leo > leon > lion > lyin'...
b) Being implies analysis (perception) during solution (perceivable)...one ignores this by consenting to the suggestion of another, which implies a synthesis.
c) Evolve/evolvere/wel - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/evolve
Nature implies linear procession (inception towards death)...few within trick many with suggested information into circular thinking (logic); which turns into a conflict of reason against one another.
Suggested information implies "theory"; reasoning about it implies "evolution".
Creationism also happens to be weakly supported. All there is for Creation theory is belief. Lack of evidence.
Better theories can be spouted off after you realize this isn't a planet in space. Then you start guess what the place is and where all these races really came from
I can just as easily apply statistical analysis to that and conclude it's just us in the universe or in this dimension thus declaring aliens are a government and Malthusians psyop.
You probably just need to try to prove the world is a globe first. Then fail. It will open up more questions, but at least you won't believe in distant planets and aliens anymore
LOL
It's actually really obvious. You don't need to believe anything. Just your own logic and reasoning once you know how to look. , I know how programming won't let you respect this topic. It takes more than half assed thought to break it.
Quiet down! I don't want our turtle overlords to start noticing my rebellious behavior!
I'm not even careful anymore. That's what this place is about. One outlet to just speak out the wild shit you can't say irl. It's ok, the AI has been telling them all about is for many, many years