Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies each chosen ones natural separation; US (united states) implies artificial unification in ignorance of natural separation.
Unification doesn't insert itself into separation...it permits those who separate to insert at the center of unification.
War implies units turning against each other, while ignoring separation from one another. It's consent to a suggestion aka following orders which self inserts one into a conflict of reason against others aka war.
Join/yeug/yoke - "collar or harness for fastening a pair of draft animals"...that's what happens to many when joining the suggestions by few...they become cattle, while being drafted as units into war against each other.
Being implies within and all (perceivable) moving through each one (perception) allows expression from within outwards..."but" inverts that, and many use it to "butt in" aka interrupt/interfere with one another.
Whatever ones writes after "but" is based on an inversion. Meanwhile...if all, then each one within...no buts.
From a christian perspective...how could one use "but" in response to God?
b) Having implies putting the yoke around self by taking possession within self...which is easy because it implies falling for the temptation of choosing want (to hold onto) over need (to let go of). Choosing to let go of what one has...that's hard.
I have no need to trade it for any thing the world provides.
a) Suggesting "I have no" implies taking possession over self (I), while denying (nihilo; nothing) that all provides each ones potential by separation from one another during procession.
b) Trading implies with one another aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion), which makes one a trader/traitor to all (perceivable) giving each one (perception) the FREE will of choice to evaluate moving value.
c) Thing implies everything separating into each thing, which trading within one another contradicts through a contract.
d) Being implies want (temporary growth) within need (ongoing loss)...hence the need to resist want at the moment(um) of being.
If one suggests "I have all I need", then one ignores being want, hence being tempted by one another within all need...it's the suggestion to one another which draws temptation closer to each other, while binding consenting choice into a contract (religion aka re-ligo aka response to bondage).
Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies each chosen ones natural separation; US (united states) implies artificial unification in ignorance of natural separation.
Unification doesn't insert itself into separation...it permits those who separate to insert at the center of unification.
War implies units turning against each other, while ignoring separation from one another. It's consent to a suggestion aka following orders which self inserts one into a conflict of reason against others aka war.
Join/yeug/yoke - "collar or harness for fastening a pair of draft animals"...that's what happens to many when joining the suggestions by few...they become cattle, while being drafted as units into war against each other.
But the yoke I have on is easy, I have no need to trade it for any thing the world provides.
a) But/butan - "from without"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/but
Being implies within and all (perceivable) moving through each one (perception) allows expression from within outwards..."but" inverts that, and many use it to "butt in" aka interrupt/interfere with one another.
Whatever ones writes after "but" is based on an inversion. Meanwhile...if all, then each one within...no buts.
From a christian perspective...how could one use "but" in response to God?
b) Having implies putting the yoke around self by taking possession within self...which is easy because it implies falling for the temptation of choosing want (to hold onto) over need (to let go of). Choosing to let go of what one has...that's hard.
a) Suggesting "I have no" implies taking possession over self (I), while denying (nihilo; nothing) that all provides each ones potential by separation from one another during procession.
b) Trading implies with one another aka buying (consent) and selling (suggestion), which makes one a trader/traitor to all (perceivable) giving each one (perception) the FREE will of choice to evaluate moving value.
c) Thing implies everything separating into each thing, which trading within one another contradicts through a contract.
d) Being implies want (temporary growth) within need (ongoing loss)...hence the need to resist want at the moment(um) of being.
If one suggests "I have all I need", then one ignores being want, hence being tempted by one another within all need...it's the suggestion to one another which draws temptation closer to each other, while binding consenting choice into a contract (religion aka re-ligo aka response to bondage).