Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

2
But of course both sides blame the other w/o reasoning which makes more sense. This is posted on TheZionald as if blaming Liberals who want to create riots that provoke ~(o.o)~ what exactly? Anarchy? Anarchy is not profitable -- but what is /for both sides/ is provoking surveillance legislation (media.scored.co)
posted 182 days ago by pkvi_chan 182 days ago by pkvi_chan +5 / -3
3 comments share
3 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (3)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 182 days ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 2 points 182 days ago +3 / -1

w/o reasoning

Reasoning implies conflicting sides. Reason tempts one to choose one or the other side, while ignoring ones "sight".

more sense

More vs less implies reasoning about "sense", while ignoring...being (life) send (inception towards death), which gives sentience to being, while sentencing life from inception towards point of death.

liberal

Aka free (liber) within all (al)...which one ignores when binding self to suggested liberal-ism.

anarchy is not profitable

Profitable implies "able to set (fit) forth (pro)", hence perception within perceivable being able to set forth suggested.

Anarchy aka "absence of government" implies ones mind controlled by suggestions sets forth by others, which puts ones mind absentia aka away (ab) from sentience; being (sentia).

for both sides is provoking surveillance legislation

a) Nature doesn't VEIL anything...it offers everything (perceivable) to each thing (perception). Ones consent to suggested puts the veil over self.

b) Surveillance implies "oversight", which is based on ones "understanding" of what others are suggesting. If one consents to suggested, then others are permitted to surveil one through the suggested.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 0 points 181 days ago +1 / -1

eigty eigt antifa members

You cannot make this stuff up.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy