Nature divides each being from one another...buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) tempts beings together, hence making differences alike.
euphoria
Euphoria implies eu/es (to be; essence of being) + phoria/bher (to carry)...nature releases each being as free will of choice; while choosing to carry suggested burdens represents sin.
A jew furthermore utilizes euphemism to tempt gentiles into euphoria, hence corrupting phori (to carry) with phēmē (speech; voice; utterance)...nature moves sound through each being; suggested words tempt each being to hold onto definitions, hence becoming DEAF PHONETICIANS.
The jews hinder the Gentiles from salvation
a) Suggested pluralism (jews; gentiles) tempts one to ignore singularity, hence gentiles collectively permitting each chosen one power (sovereign) over the collective (commonwealth).
b) Action (tion) cannot be saved (salva)...reactions can be tricked to ignore perceivable, while holding onto suggested.
A jew tempts gentiles to "save" suggested information within mind/memory, while ignoring that all perceivable moves each ones perception apart from one another.
c) Holding onto suggested HINDERS ones perception to draw from perceivable.
jews have a lot of money, a lot of wealth, a lot of power
a) Gentiles represent the lot (share) a jew casts together with suggested money.
b) The lot of gentiles ignore wealth when choosing suggested currency over perceivable current.
c) Gentiles supplying a lot of power to each jew implies democracy aka dēmos (common people) + kratos (strength).
They use all of this to poison the world
Gentiles willingly ignore what ALL perceivable was, when consenting to what a chosen one suggests ALL is.
One of the reasons I'm anti...
Reasoning implies one against one another, hence pro vs anti....an artificial conflict; permitting each jew control over both sides of every war gentiles are fighting each other over.
I'm not a Nazi.
Within all...each one implies foreign to one another and native/nati/nazi to origin.
I distance myself from Nazism.
a) Ignoring perceivable for suggested...distances native from origin, while permitting foreigners access to one.
b) MY contradicts distance, since it implies a taking into possession and holding onto "myself", which establishes a conflict with "yourself".
A jew suggests -isms to tempt gentiles into taking possession; as to establish conflicts among gentiles called "reason".
Devil implies division (de) buying/selling (vile/wes)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vile#etymonline_v_7787
Nature divides each being from one another...buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) tempts beings together, hence making differences alike.
Euphoria implies eu/es (to be; essence of being) + phoria/bher (to carry)...nature releases each being as free will of choice; while choosing to carry suggested burdens represents sin.
A jew furthermore utilizes euphemism to tempt gentiles into euphoria, hence corrupting phori (to carry) with phēmē (speech; voice; utterance)...nature moves sound through each being; suggested words tempt each being to hold onto definitions, hence becoming DEAF PHONETICIANS.
a) Suggested pluralism (jews; gentiles) tempts one to ignore singularity, hence gentiles collectively permitting each chosen one power (sovereign) over the collective (commonwealth).
b) Action (tion) cannot be saved (salva)...reactions can be tricked to ignore perceivable, while holding onto suggested.
A jew tempts gentiles to "save" suggested information within mind/memory, while ignoring that all perceivable moves each ones perception apart from one another.
c) Holding onto suggested HINDERS ones perception to draw from perceivable.
a) Gentiles represent the lot (share) a jew casts together with suggested money.
b) The lot of gentiles ignore wealth when choosing suggested currency over perceivable current.
c) Gentiles supplying a lot of power to each jew implies democracy aka dēmos (common people) + kratos (strength).
Gentiles willingly ignore what ALL perceivable was, when consenting to what a chosen one suggests ALL is.
Reasoning implies one against one another, hence pro vs anti....an artificial conflict; permitting each jew control over both sides of every war gentiles are fighting each other over.
Within all...each one implies foreign to one another and native/nati/nazi to origin.
a) Ignoring perceivable for suggested...distances native from origin, while permitting foreigners access to one.
b) MY contradicts distance, since it implies a taking into possession and holding onto "myself", which establishes a conflict with "yourself".
A jew suggests -isms to tempt gentiles into taking possession; as to establish conflicts among gentiles called "reason".