TL;DR: Ruppelt and J. Allen Hynek (to be covered later) were put in place as the spokespeople for two opposite positions: “flying saucers are real” and “you did not see what you thought you saw”. Who knows what’s going on in the sky, but if either of these two positions was correct, “They” would never have needed to set up these characters to sell us. When do “They” ever sell us the truth?

<high-pitched annoying class valedictorian voice>:

Merriam-Webster defines “dialectic” as “discussion and reasoning by dialogue as a method of intellectual investigation”.

Sounds good, bro, but the problem is that we are under constant psychological warfare, and one of the main techniques is that while everyone is busily engaging in spirited and informed dialectic with one another, we have covertly been handed a “false dialectic”. As I like to say it, you may choose freely among all the available conclusions, because all of them are wrong.

That’s what we’ve had concerning the UFO phenomenon for nearly eight decades. You are free to believe flying saucers from Mars have little green men in them, or you can believe it’s drunk hillbillies who do not recognize the Planet Venus when they see it. We have since been handed some variations and elaboration on those. So it’s not little green men, it’s time-traveling humans sent to warn us away from nuking ourselves. Does that really make a difference, fundamentally?

Well fundamentally, neither of those choices is correct, and that’s what serves to keep us away from the truth. What we’ll see is that “They” set up the false dialectic of this manufactured polarity using two spokesholes. Ruppelt, our case in point, coined the term “Unidentified Flying Object” to add some sort of scientific legitimacy to saucers. We just got through seeing the exact same thing with this “UAP” BS injected into popular culture, did we not?

So, do I know what’s going on with all this? I do not. What I do know is what anyone needs to know before they could possibly imagine they know what’s going on with all this: the entire “phenomenon” is absolutely riven with characters who are more sus than they could possibly imagine. You’ll have to take my word for it, but Ruppelt and Hynek are just the beginning of what I sometimes feel I may never get to the end of. But let’s take that first step….

I wrote briefly about Edward J. Ruppelt (1923-1960), Captain USAF, in my last post:

The (False) Dawn of the Flying Saucer Age was launched out of the US Army Air Forces in 1947, fake investigated by the US Air Force until 1969, and run by “Them” all along (conspiracies.win 4/7/2025)

The preeminent point about Ruppelt is that all along he was working for the head of Air Force Intelligence, General Charles P. Cabell. You can link outward from that post to even more about Cabell and his family. They have been at it for literally centuries. I cannot understate how damning this single association is.

Going from a bloodline to a technical line, I mentioned in the post that there were “problems in his timeline”. We’ll take a look at that now to demonstrate that he was an asset who was in on this psyop from the jump. His wiki tells us:

After the war, Ruppelt was released into the Army reserves. He attended Iowa State College, where in 1951 he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in aeronautical engineering. Shortly after finishing his education, Ruppelt was called back to active military duty after the Korean War began. He was assigned to the Air Technical Intelligence Center headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

Sounds fine on its own but—as mentioned in that last post—you very often must look around what you’re told to get at the truth. Think it through for yourself: WW2 ended in 1945, Ed is discharged and goes to college, and he gets recalled to active service in 1951. Well then, how did this take place just two paragraphs before?

Ruppelt was the director of Project Grudge in 1949….

I think someone is fibbing about where he was and what he was up to. And up to what might he have been? In that last post, I complained bitterly about how the USAF suddenly somehow started collecting reports on the flying saucers they had just said were bullshit after Roswell:

During 1947 the Air Force collected 147 flying saucer reports at its Technical Intelligence Division of the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio….

Did you notice where Ed was reassigned when he was recalled to service? Exact same place! Everyone is free to disagree, but it just to me seems simpler to conclude that Ed was at Wright-Patt all along, and that he was the one collecting those reports in the second half of 1947.

So it is not historically acknowledged that Ruppelt was there at the beginning, nor is it acknowledged that he was there right after the beginning, with Project Sign. However—surprise!—it was from Ruppelt that we learned about Sign:

Project Sign was first asserted in the 1956 book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by retired Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt who later directed Project Blue Book. In this he also claimed that Sign had produced an "Estimate of the Situation" which endorsed an interplanetary explanation for UFOs, but General Hoyt Vandenberg, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, shut down Project Sign for lack of proof. No copy of this document or any other corroboration of Ruppelt's claim has been produced, and Popular Mechanics called the report "probably more mythological than real".

To properly deconstruct and understand this, you have to take a step back and realize that Vandenberg, Cabell, and Ruppelt were all in on it together and, really, that’s about all the was necessary. As you can see, that group could arrange to feed you any narrative they pleased. As we’ll see in the next post, Ruppelt was Hynek’s handler so you can count that as a fourth, if you like. Did not take much to boot the whole thing up, did it?

Ruppelt goes on to direct Project Grudge and Project Blue Book, both created by Cabell. Again, see how small the group is? He leaves Blue Book fairly quickly and do you know what I think the real problem was? Too much legitimate evidence was being uncovered:

Ruppelt started the trend, largely followed by later Blue Book investigations, of not giving serious consideration to numerous reports of UFO landings and/or interaction with purported UFO occupants.

At this point, “They” wanted to shut down any investigation that might lead to… well, we’re still trying to figure out what it leads to, what lies beyond the hurricane of hoaxes and liars which I will cover in future posts. Remember, this was all designed to be a false dialectic, not a real dialectic. More on this in the Hynek writeup.

To finish, Ruppelt dropped dead from what we are told was a heart attack at the age of 37. Just seems sus, don’t it?

Bonus: Let me mention Ed’s association with prominent Ufologist Donald Keyhoe and prominent Ufological organization, the National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena (NICAP). Much more to say about both of those, but the fun factoid I’ll leave you with is that NICAP was founded by inventor T. Townsend Brown. Sure, I get that it’s relatively common, but Brown is a name from the Salem Witch Trials. What are the chances?