Shamelessly linking this users post.

https://np.reddit.com/r/UFOB/comments/1jigc3u/the_pyramid_team_has_released_the_video_of_their/

Tried to watch the video myself but I dont understand french and the auto translator is super annoying. But I definitely got "crystals give you wings" vibes.

Event Details: • Location: Artemide Congress Center, Italy • Attendance: Over 900 participants, with potential for 2,000 if pre-sales had continued • Moderator: Nicole Ciccolo • Main Speakers: Corrado Malanga, Armando Mei, Filippo Biondi • Topic: Exploration of the Pyramid of Khafre using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to uncover hidden internal structures and their historical significance • Date of Project Initiation: September 1, 2022, following a meeting in Pescara, Italy Introduction by Nicole Ciccolo: Nicole Ciccolo opened the conference, expressing excitement and gratitude for the massive turnout, which exceeded expectations. She highlighted the historical significance of the event, describing it as a moment never seen before, made possible by the collaborative efforts of Malanga, Mei, and Biondi. Ciccolo emphasized the innovative use of aerospace technologies to reveal secrets of the Giza Plateau, building on prior work on the Pyramid of Khufu (Cheops).

Background and Research Context

The research team—Filippo Biondi, Armando Mei, and Corrado Malanga—combined their expertise to investigate the Giza pyramids, focusing on the Pyramid of Khafre. Their previous studies on the Pyramid of Khufu utilized SAR to uncover hidden structures, published in scientific journals and books. This success inspired the “Kefren Project,” aimed at understanding the internal architecture of Khafre and recontextualizing the Giza complex within a broader historical framework of Ancient Egypt. The conference builds on the premise that conventional Egyptology has overlooked significant aspects of the pyramids’ purpose and construction, which the team addresses through advanced non-invasive technologies.

Armando Mei’s Presentation

Introduction and Project Origins Armando Mei began by thanking the audience for their overwhelming support, noting it as unprecedented in his 30-year career. He described the conference as the start of a “new Zep Tepi” (First Time), a term from Egyptian mythology, signaling a rewriting of ancient history through scientific and experimental archaeology. • Project Start: September 1, 2022, in Pescara, Italy, facilitated by Pino Morelli, where Mei met Malanga and Biondi. • Collaboration: Mei was researching the northern shaft of the Queen’s Chamber in the Pyramid of Khufu, while Malanga and Biondi had advanced SAR-based studies on the same pyramid. Their findings aligned, particularly regarding a hidden chamber marked in green in their reconstructions. Historical Context and Zep Tepi Theory Mei presented his theory on the dating of the Giza Plateau: • Conventional Dating: Egyptologists date the pyramids to around 2500 BCE. • Mei’s Hypothesis: Based on astronomical alignments and structural analysis, he dates the complex to 36,400 BCE, far earlier than accepted timelines. This extends Robert Bauval’s Orion Correlation Theory (10,500 BCE), incorporating additional monuments like the Sphinx, mastabas, and temples. Mei argued that understanding the builders’ mindset—using a universal language of numbers and astronomy—is key to interpreting the pyramids. He linked this to Thoth (Tot), the Egyptian god of wisdom and science, as a central figure in the Giza design. On-Site Observations Mei detailed findings from the “Egypt Unveiled” tour, where the team examined the pyramids of Khufu and Khafre: Pyramid of Khufu • Northern Facade: Blocks show water erosion, suggesting submersion around 10,500 BCE, supporting an older timeline. • Grand Gallery: A granite block obstructs a passage, potentially leading to undiscovered areas, corroborated by SAR reconstructions. • King’s Chamber: Conversations with custodians revealed a hidden corridor behind a modern wall, descending to a well, possibly linked to the Queen’s Chamber shaft. Pyramid of Khafre • Descending Corridor: A niche contains ScanPyramids muon detectors, which Mei critiques as less effective than SAR. • Belzoni Chamber: ◦ Visited on March 2, 2025, exactly 207 years after Belzoni’s discovery (March 2, 1818). ◦ Features two pairs of shafts and a granite block niche, hinting at hidden passages. ◦ Floor blocks near the “sarcophagus” (interpreted as a basin) have holes, possibly for sliding a lid, suggesting a functional purpose beyond burial. Temple of the Valley • Construction: Massive granite and sandstone blocks (up to 70-80 tons) with precise cuts, inconsistent with Fourth Dynasty tools (wooden mallets, copper chisels). • Symbolic Design: The layout yields numbers 3, 7, and 1 (forming 137), linked to physics and Egyptian symbolism (e.g., Shin, Tau, Zain), suggesting a coded message about immortality and Amenti, the underworld city. The Emerald Tablets Mei explored the controversial Emerald Tablets, attributed to Thoth: • Authenticity: Acknowledged as dubious by academics due to no original text, but Mei sees potential truth in its descriptions. • Analysis with Biondi: Decoded phrases using Sumerian and Proto-Semitic languages, revealing meanings like “the temple of Thoth as a tool for the spirit” and “forging the divine spirit,” aligning with their hypothesis of the pyramids as spiritual instruments.

Corrado Malanga’s Presentation

Technical Approach: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Malanga focused on the technical backbone of the research: • SAR Mechanism: Like bat echolocation, SAR uses electromagnetic waves to create high-resolution tomographic images of the pyramid’s interior, processed via Fourier transforms. • Advantages Over Muon Radiography: Unlike muon detectors (used by ScanPyramids), SAR requires no internal access, offers higher resolution, and avoids long wait times for cosmic ray detection. Findings: Internal Structures of Khafre Malanga presented SAR-generated tomographies and 3D models: • Chambers and Tunnels: Images reveal a network of vertical and horizontal voids, including five “Z-shaped” structures (tunnels or supports) and two large chambers at 648 meters below ground zero. • Underground Complex: A vast system, potentially the mythical Amenti, extends beneath Khafre and possibly connects to other Giza structures. Depth reaches over 1,200 meters in some areas. Artificial Intelligence Validation • AI Analysis: Fed SAR data into AI, which confirmed voids and structures, generating a 3D model matching the tomographies. • Strategic Use: Malanga used AI to counter skepticism, as it independently corroborated their findings, challenging official narratives. Comparative Analysis • 1968 Muon Study: Led by Luis Alvarez, it scanned only 18% of Khafre, finding nothing due to poor positioning (camera in Belzoni Chamber missed key areas). • ScanPyramids Critique: Malanga dismissed their “Big Void” findings in Khufu as inconclusive (based on five muons), contrasting SAR’s comprehensive imaging. Structural Engineering Insights • Foundation System: The pyramid sits on a massive limestone platform (piastra), extending beyond its base, supported by vertical structures (piles) to prevent sinking into the sand. • Calculations: AI estimated a minimum platform thickness of 4.5 meters, with piles reducing subsidence from 10 meters to 6 meters, explaining the deep structures’ purpose. Broader Giza Implications • Khufu and Menkaure: Similar deep structures appear in tomographies of these pyramids, suggesting a plateau-wide underground network. • Osiris Shaft: Near the Sphinx, this shaft descends 35 meters to a granite structure in water, with SAR showing further depths (100-200 meters), possibly a chamber.

Broader Implications and Future Directions The speakers proposed that the pyramids were not mere tombs but complex instruments—possibly for spiritual transformation or technological purposes—built by an advanced civilization predating the Fourth Dynasty. Key points: • Historical Revision: The 36,400 BCE dating and underground city challenge Egyptological orthodoxy. • Technological Legacy: The precision of construction and encoded numbers (e.g., 137, 432) suggest advanced knowledge. • Future Research: Plans include wider SAR scans of the Giza Plateau, tracing water channels, and revisiting Khufu and Menkaure data. They acknowledged resistance from academics and Egyptian authorities, citing denied access and bureaucratic hurdles, yet urged continued exploration using SAR and AI.

Conclusion The conference concluded with a call to action, emphasizing the need to rethink ancient history through modern technology. The team’s SAR findings—validated by AI—reveal a hidden world beneath Khafre, potentially Amenti, with implications for understanding human civilization’s past. Malanga offered autographs, signaling openness to public engagement.

Summary This conference showcased a revolutionary study of the Pyramid of Khafre using Synthetic Aperture Radar, uncovering a complex of chambers, tunnels, and a possible underground city. Armando Mei provided historical and on-site context, dating the Giza complex to 36,400 BCE and linking it to Thoth and Amenti. Corrado Malanga detailed the SAR technology, presenting tomographic evidence of deep structures, supported by AI and structural analysis. Challenging traditional views, the team posits the pyramids as multifunctional instruments, calling for further research to unlock the Giza Plateau’s secrets.

It definitely seems sensationalized but ill point out this comment in that thread.

‘Verified with AI’? Are you fucking kidding me? How would AI verify data from what they say is a new analysis method, when there isn’t any comparative data to train on? Backed up with AI doesn’t give me much hope if that’s what they are relying on.

Skipping through the video they have a segment where they are using this lidar technology on ancient works, and newer ones. My guess is thats how they are training the AI. So that part does seem legit to me.

They didnt really show the pillars though, they showed something that looked like a screw more than a pillar, and it sounds like the biggest feature is a limestone base that was built to support the pyramids. Its not entirely hollow under there like these influencers keep making it look like. Those "gaps" are filled with sand.

Again, I dont think its insane to think there could be something to this since legends have talked about some kind of labyrinth down there before.

https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-africa/lost-labyrinth-ancient-egypt-part-1-002033

Accounts of the Ancient Egyptian Labyrinth Herodotus was not the only historian to describe the labyrinth of ancient Egypt. The massive temple complex was described by many classic authors, including Manetho Aegyptiaca (3rd century BC), Diodorus Siculus (1st century BC), Strabo (64 BC – 19 AD), Pliny (23 – 79 AD), and Pomponius Mela (c 43 AD), and at least two of whom claimed to have seen the labyrinth first-hand.

It has twelve courts covered in, with gates facing one another, six upon the North side and six upon the South, joining on one to another, and the same wall surrounds them all outside; and there are in it two kinds of chambers, the one kind below the ground and the other above upon these, three thousand in number, of each kind fifteen hundred. The upper set of chambers we ourselves saw;… but the chambers underground we heard about only… For the passages through the chambers, and the goings this way and that way through the courts, which were admirably adorned, afforded endless matter for marvel, as we went through from a court to the chambers beyond it, and from the chambers to colonnades, and from the colonnades to other rooms, and then from the chambers again to other courts. Over the whole of these is a roof made of stone like the walls; and the walls are covered with figures carved upon them, each court being surrounded with pillars of white stone fitted together most perfectly; and at the end of the labyrinth, by the corner of it, there is a pyramid of forty fathoms, upon which large figures are carved, and to this there is a way made under ground. Such is this labyrinth.

From what I gather from the beginning of their conference, they seem to believe thats what they have discovered.

Even if somehow legit, the powers that be would never allow such a thing to be made mainstream, doubly so if the records of humanitys true origins lay down there.

This is a shit test just like the mrna clot shots and chemtrails.

Believing any of it means you have failed the test.

Who funded the scientists?

It's as interesting as the theory of the pyramids being giant batteries, leaving me with same question: what's it used for?

No explanations as usual, just new Hollywood script material or a possible avenue to divert funds for (fuck) NASA.