Asking AI a question implies by ones choice, which in return permits others to utilize artifice to shape choices. Realizing this makes it irrelevant what "gronk" says in response.
In this example...ones choice asking about vaccination implies ones willing consent to suggested vaccination. Consent implies both agreement and disagreement, because the resulting conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) holds both sides together.
Since consent in nature was already given; AI can then be used to artificially supply more choices to those who ignore natural choice.
Did you click it to see what gronk say?
Asking AI a question implies by ones choice, which in return permits others to utilize artifice to shape choices. Realizing this makes it irrelevant what "gronk" says in response.
In this example...ones choice asking about vaccination implies ones willing consent to suggested vaccination. Consent implies both agreement and disagreement, because the resulting conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) holds both sides together.
Since consent in nature was already given; AI can then be used to artificially supply more choices to those who ignore natural choice.