a) Others wrote the words ones mind/memory holds onto, which in return permits others to also read from without what can be shaped within.
b) Words represent a controlled en-viro-ment aka mind (ment) within (in) circle (viro/viron) aka circular logic.
c) Ask yourself about the nature of reading and writing without words suggested by others...
Read implies "put in order"; write implies "set forth as an author"...so what if nature puts authors (life) into order (inception towards death)? Could there be such a process without words to describe it?
Leading researchers join Brian Greene to explore how AI is pushing mind reading technologies rapidly forward.
This program is part of the Big Ideas series, supported by the John Templeton Foundation.
Participants: Jean-Rémi King, Michael Blumenstein, Lizzie O'Shea, & Toby Walsh
Moderator: Brian Greene
A lead sets itself apart...followers join together.
If AI pushes, then why does it require input? What if only nature pushes (inception towards death) to shove (life)?
Ones consent to suggested ideal-ism positions one under another, hence into a smaller position than those "big" ideas.
Only within whole can there be participants, and being a part within whole implies a separation from one another.
Moderate/moderatus - "within bounds" implies a moderator binding the free will of choice of participants...if consent is given.
a) Others wrote the words ones mind/memory holds onto, which in return permits others to also read from without what can be shaped within.
b) Words represent a controlled en-viro-ment aka mind (ment) within (in) circle (viro/viron) aka circular logic.
c) Ask yourself about the nature of reading and writing without words suggested by others...
Read implies "put in order"; write implies "set forth as an author"...so what if nature puts authors (life) into order (inception towards death)? Could there be such a process without words to describe it?